tissues ready and waiting in case I cry.
Chris
(30 years old today, but feeling at least twice that age)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alastair Campbell
Sent: 13 June 2007 19:34
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Back
On 14 Jun 2007, at 10:01:43, Chris Taylor wrote:
Things are going to get even more interesting as I'm just about to
install
Windows 3.11 on a virtual machine to test this stuff *for real*. I
have
tissues ready and waiting in case I cry.
If you plan on using JavaScript then you'll be
Nope, it's genuine. This is an extranet system that financial services
companies will be connecting to. Did you know that Norwich Union has
thousands of users still in Win3.1 and NN4.03 (so I've been told)? And
some
of the other insurance and mortgage companies aren't much better. Then
there
Chris Taylor wrote:
Thanks for the input everyone, it looks like old-school tables with inline
styles is the way to go, unfortunately.
You may be right, if it were me, I'd install an old copy of Frontpage or
dreamweaver and use that... matching the era of the tool with the era of
the browser
Hi all,
I've been asked to write a website that MUST work in Netscape 4.03 and
IE 3 for Windows 3.1. When you've stopped laughing I'm afraid I have to
say I'm serious, and there's no chance at all that the people connecting
to the site will upgrade.
So, any tips to do this without reverting all
On 12 Jun 2007, at 17:04, Chris Taylor wrote:
I've been asked to write a website that MUST work in Netscape 4.03 and
IE 3 for Windows 3.1. When you've stopped laughing I'm afraid I
have to
say I'm serious, and there's no chance at all that the people
connecting
to the site will upgrade.
Chris
If this is Internet and not in intranet, I suggest that you design for the
real customers; that is people who visit the site and not those who own it.
If this user group are still for some strange reason, bound by running
windows 3.1 etc.. do it the old way, take the money and don't put it
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Dorward
Sent: 12 June 2007 17:09
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Back to the Future
On 12 Jun 2007, at 17:04, Chris Taylor wrote:
I've been asked to write a website that MUST work in Netscape 4.03 and
IE 3 for Windows 3.1. When you've
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Dorward
Sent: 12 June 2007 17:09
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Back to the Future
On 12 Jun 2007, at 17:04, Chris Taylor wrote:
I've been asked to write a website that MUST work in Netscape 4.03 and
IE 3
June 2007 17:09
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Back to the Future
On 12 Jun 2007, at 17:04, Chris Taylor wrote:
I've been asked to write a website that MUST work in Netscape 4.03 and
IE 3 for Windows 3.1. When you've stopped laughing I'm afraid I
have to
say I'm serious
Chris Taylor wrote:
[]
My initial tests show that NN4.03 handles some CSS (float,
background, border, font etc) but not some important things
(list-style, margin and padding on lists). Is there a source for
information about CSS support on old browsers?
Nick Roper wrote:
Info on CSS
Chris Taylor skrev:
Hi all,
I've been asked to write a website that MUST work in Netscape 4.03 and
Remember to put modern CSS in a separate, imported stylesheet file, as
NN4 can crash when encountering CSS that it does not know how to interpret.
/Anders
I've been asked to write a website that MUST work in Netscape 4.03 and
IE 3 for Windows 3.1. When you've stopped laughing I'm afraid I have to
say I'm serious, and there's no chance at all that the people connecting
to the site will upgrade.
I'm quite curious about this - do you genuinely have
My initial tests show that NN4.03 handles some CSS (float, background,
border, font etc) but not some important things (list-style, margin and
padding on lists). Is there a source for information about CSS support on
old browsers?
if you are going to use css with netscape 4 I suggest you do
14 matches
Mail list logo
