James Ellis wrote:
and remember that Wine is an emulation layer, it may not give the same
results as virtualising Windows (which is a standard Windows install). It
depends on how good the emulation is.
For instance, before using virtualisation to test IE in XP, I was using Wine
and
I just ordered a new iMac
I asked them to include Win XP OEM for £77 and Parallels Desktop for
£33. Of course this OEM price is only for when you buy the computer...
An iMac WITH a fully functioning, 100% legal Windows XP for ONLY an
additional £110 (AND you can run multiple instances of
note to anyone who wants to run ies4mac.
install wine verstion .51
the current version doesnt work.
-kevin
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
I found that out! darwine won't load them
On Feb 7 2008, at 13:07, kevin mcmonagle wrote:
note to anyone who wants to run ies4mac.
install wine verstion .51
the current version doesnt work.
-kevin
***
List Guidelines:
Can't seem to find a mac link to download wine...my impression was
that you needed darwine for this.
Am i missing something?
James De Angelis, Designer
reactive
www.reactive.com
Level 1, 490 Crown Street p: +61 2 9339 1001
Surry Hills NSW, 2010 f: +61 2 9380 4787
Australia e:
and remember that Wine is an emulation layer, it may not give the same
results as virtualising Windows (which is a standard Windows install). It
depends on how good the emulation is.
For instance, before using virtualisation to test IE in XP, I was using Wine
and ies4linux and not getting
I perfer fusion over parallels.
Cheapest option to run IE only has got to be
http://www.kronenberg.org/ies4osx/ which is free. I haven't tested it,
so I'm not sure how accurate the rendering is compared to running a
real version of windows.
On Fri , kevin mcmonagle sent:
Whats my cheapest
it renders the same but the gui is forked.
Terrence Wood wrote:
I perfer fusion over parallels.
Cheapest option to run IE only has got to be
http://www.kronenberg.org/ies4osx/ which is free. I haven't tested it,
so I'm not sure how accurate the rendering is compared to running a
real version
thanks for the good reply's guys. I think im gonna try this one first:
http://macapper.com/2007/11/29/ies4osx-run-internet-explorer-567-natively-in-os-x/
-best
kevin
Joe Ortenzi wrote:
horses for courses. Worked fine on three of my leopards,
two installed under tiger then updated to
hi,
just a quick follow up. After 20mins downloading and installing and no
cost im running ie6 and 7 natively in tiger with ies4osx. It aint pretty
but it works.
-best
kevin
kevin mcmonagle wrote:
thanks for the good reply's guys. I think im gonna try this one first:
Personally I reccommend paralells or vmware fusion, my setup.
Virtual PC does not work worth a damn after os 9.
I bought an OEM copy of XP when I bought the Mac, less than £100. Not
sure what currency you use. and parallels was cheap.
you can use bootcamp if you like but I prefer within os
That looks great Kevin.
How does it compare for speed (native versus virtual) and stability.
what do you mean written in Qt?
On Jan 25 2008, at 09:34, James Ellis wrote:
Hi Kevin
One option is to use VirtualBox (virtualbox.org) which is
virtualisation
software written in Qt. Looks to
horses for courses. Worked fine on three of my leopards, two
installed under tiger then updated to leopard, one afterwards. I
reccommend running it as reccommended and not tweaking very much. but
give it plenty of RAM!
but If vmware works for you, brill!
one of my developers compared and
Hi Kevin
One option is to use VirtualBox (virtualbox.org) which is virtualisation
software written in Qt. Looks to have Mac OSX host capabilities
(http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewforum.php?f=8)
I use the open source edition in KDE and run all the Windows browsers in an XP
guest for testing.
Had a terrible time on my Intel MacBook with Parallels Desktop; it refused to play nice with OS X Leopard. Wouldn't even install properly. Switched to VMware Fusion, and haven't had a problem since.
g.
On Fri , kevin mcmonagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
Hi,
Whats my cheapest option for
Hi,
Whats my cheapest option for getting ie7 to run on my intel based mac.
Is it basically an option between boot camp, parallels or virtual pc?
Very frustrated with discrepancies at the moment.
-best
kevin
***
List Guidelines:
On Jan 25, 2008 6:08 AM, kevin mcmonagle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whats my cheapest option for getting ie7 to run on my intel based mac.
Is it basically an option between boot camp, parallels or virtual pc?
Very frustrated with discrepancies at the moment.
Yes - Parallels, VMWare Fusion, or
17 matches
Mail list logo