Thanks for your responses...
Why use more than one H1? Simple...2 areas of the page that are of
equal importance.
Why should it only be one? I understand the simplicity of focusing on
one area of each page and the impact that could have in search
resultsbut that that doesn't entirely
Speaking as both publications, graphic and web designer, the real problem has always been that the title resides in the head, not in a title tag inside the body.H1 is reserved for the title of the page.In a document, at least, there's only one title, while there may be many first level
I attempted this very topic before in a blog post:
http://www.flexewebs.com/semantix/semantic-uses-of-h1-h2-h6-html-tags/
http://www.flexewebs.com/semantix/semantic-uses-of-h1-h2-h6-html-tags/Hope
it makes sense.
Thanks,
Jason
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:08 AM, c...@fagandesign.com.au wrote:
While I agree that you can have several areas of equal importance on a
page. I still beg to differ that you would want to saturate the
effectiveness of a h1 tag by using it by wrapping it around the logo. It
seems to me to be a little like the infamous can you make my logo a
little bigger that
2009/10/16 Adam Martin ajmartin...@gmail.com:
Again the logo is usually only the most important thing to the owner - not
the customer - the customer will recognise if they are on the right site or
not.
I believe it”s appropriate to represent the logo as a h1 on a site’s
home page, unless you
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Marilyn Langfeld
m...@langfeldesigns.comwrote:
...
H1 is reserved for the title of the page. In a document, at least, there's
only one title, while there may be many first level headings.
...
So H1 is, IMHO, not the first level header, but the T1, or
Tim,
Well done for reading the spec - it's always a must.
However, Google came after the HTML4.01 spec and what Google wants we give
it - so the 'only one H1 per page' guideline comes from SEO best practices
as well as general semantics and IA best practices.
So the spec does not tell you to use
The issue with having more then 1 H! tag is not the validity of the page as
XHTML or HTML5 or any other specification, its not even affecting WCAG1/2.
the only case that is affected is the search engines relationship with H1
that entitled it as the Content's Title. it is not mandatory that it will
I am not sure that a page with multiple important subject does not exist. so
IA wise and semantic wise this is not a must. google wise it is.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Jason Grant ja...@flexewebs.com wrote:
Tim,
Well done for reading the spec - it's always a must.
However, Google
Yuval,
Everything exists on the Internet, but it doesn't mean it's good.
So pages with multiple subject do exist, they are just known as 'bad pages'
from IA perspective. ;-)
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Yuval Ararat yara...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not sure that a page with multiple important
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: More than one H1? (was [WSG] Out of Office AutoReply: WSG
Digest)
I am not sure that a page with multiple important subject does not exist. so
IA wise and semantic wise this is not a must. google wise it is.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Jason Grant
OK, straight from Google Webmaster Central:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIn5qJKU8VMfeature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIn5qJKU8VMfeature=channel(video from
March 2009)
Tim
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Jason Grant ja...@flexewebs.com wrote:
Tim,
Well done for reading the
Tim
To keep it really simple:
Spec + SEO + Good IA + Semantics + Accessibility + Common sense == One H1
per page
Hope this makes sense?
Thanks,
Jason
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Tim White tjameswh...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, straight from Google Webmaster Central:
13 matches
Mail list logo
