Hi all, have come across something that I'm sure has come up before...
Have created a new site with the logo wrapped in a H1 tag.
The title of each page is also a H1.
Just got word back from an outsourced SEO expert who says it's
probably better if there was only one H1 on each page.
h1 tags are very important to the seo on each of your pages. If you
think about the theme of each page is your logo really one of the most
important elements on the page (according to the visitor and also to the
search engines). I personally advise not using h1 for logos. Each page
on your
I've heard that too and I always make sure I only have one H1 in my pages.
Are you able to change your code? Why did you choose to wrap your logo in a
H1 element? I normally do logos as either a background image on the H1 or
just as an IMG on it's own; no wrapper (except perhaps a #header or
Its not specified any where that a single H1 is the right approach. SEO guys
have found that google search engine tends to read the H1 as the main
subject and decided to punish any page with more then one. the punishment is
not severe so not every one of the major sites obey.
In HTML 5 there is a
Reported Spam
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Smith, Warwick
warwick.sm...@dbcde.gov.auwrote:
Hi,
I am currently out of the office. I will return to the office on Tuesday 14
July.
If your request is of urgent nature please email webreque...@dbcde.gov.auor
call Melynda Taylor on 6271
On 6/2/09, Helen Skewes helen.ske...@austmus.gov.au wrote:
Hello, I'm currently out of the office. Look forward to talking
tomorrow, 3rd June. Thanks, Helen.
Helen Skewes
Web Redevelopment Project Manager
Australian Museum
6 College Street Sydney NSW 2010 Australia
t 61 2 9320 6327
Hello and thanks for your kindness . my questions is not an urgent query and
i can wait i like to call you and speak with you but my English languag is
not so good to could speak without problem by phone and it is not nesesery i
can wait till you comeback , i hope you have a good time in your
I am on vacation until 5 January 2009.
If it's urgent, you can contact me on:
m. 0429 348 132
e. ge...@dhillon-pack.net
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and
may contain legally privileged or
I am on vacation until 5 January 2009.
If it's urgent, you can contact me on:
m. 0429 348 132
e. ge...@dhillon-pack.net
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and
may contain legally privileged or
I am on vacation until 5 January 2009.
If it's urgent, you can contact me on:
m. 0429 348 132
e. ge...@dhillon-pack.net
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and
may contain legally privileged or
I am on vacation until 5 January 2009.
If it's urgent, you can contact me on:
m. 0429 348 132
e. ge...@dhillon-pack.net
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and
may contain legally privileged or
I am on vacation until 5 January 2009.
If it's urgent, you can contact me on:
m. 0429 348 132
e. ge...@dhillon-pack.net
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and
may contain legally privileged or
Sent: 22 December 2008 13:55
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Out of Office AutoReply: WSG Digest
I am on vacation until 5 January 2009.
If it's urgent, you can contact me on:
m. 0429 348 132
e. ge...@dhillon-pack.net Please consider the environment before printing
this e-mail
anybody know when Geoff is coming back??
On Dec 22, 2008, at 9:01 AM, Geoff Pack wrote:
I am on vacation until 5 January 2009.
If it's urgent, you can contact me on:
m. 0429 348 132
e. ge...@dhillon-pack.net Please consider the environment before
printing this e-mail.
The information
: Re: [WSG] Out of Office AutoReply: WSG Digest
anybody know when Geoff is coming back??
On Dec 22, 2008, at 9:01 AM, Geoff Pack wrote:
I am on vacation until 5 January 2009.
If it's urgent, you can contact me on:
m. 0429 348 132
e. ge...@dhillon-pack.net Please consider
Moinmoin,
I’m not out of the office and will be here to read all the ‘out of the
office’ messages all over the festive season. :-)
—Pascal
On 13/12/2008, at 1:08 AM, Griffiths, Lynne wrote:
I am out of the office until Monday 12 January 2009. For any
communication and media issues
I will be out of the office until Monday 3rd September.
You can contact the web team directly on 5836 or via the email group
'web development'.
*** IMPORTANT NOTICE ***
*** NHSBSA DISCLAIMER ***
This e-mail and any attachments transmitted with it, including replies and
forwarded copies
You know, I belong to perhaps two dozen email lists, and this one and one
other are the only ones plagued with the oof (out of office) notice
problem. Yahoo groups, in particular seem to have this well under control.
I am on something like ten Yahoo groups, with thousands of members across
them,
On 8/16/07, Chris Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My point is, there must be a software solution to this in the mailing list
software. Yahoo must be filtering these messages, no? Isn't there a better
mousetrap here, rather than expecting thousands of members to remember to
edit their
Guys,
We have asked that meta discussion go directly to the admin group,
rather than bogging down the list.
That said - while I agree with the sentiment, it is a software based
problem.
At the moment we are receiving generous free service from webboy.
Webboy uses particular technologies and
ADMIN - THREAD CLOSED
Yes, it is annoying, and something we are looking into.
However, we have requested, MANY TIMES, that you make you
comments/complaints/issues known to memberhelp rather than to the entire
list - as all you do is aggravate the situation.
If issues - send to: [EMAIL
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of russ - maxdesign
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 8:20 AM
To: Web Standards Group
Subject: Re: [WSG] Out of Office AutoReply: WSG Digest - ADMIN - THREAD
CLOSED
ADMIN - THREAD CLOSED
Yes, it is annoying, and something we are looking into.
However, we have requested, MANY
22 matches
Mail list logo
