> Tee G. Peng
> Hmmm, I didn't think about that. My clients asked me how to add
> *decorative* images by themselves, I asked are they any meaning/
> purpose of those images, are they echo to your content, they said no
> I just wanted my page looks nice in certain area. I told them sorry
> y
Quoting Matthew Pennell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 11/09/2007, Patrick H. Lauke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For hand-crafted pages, done by a web artisan...
Is that what we're calling ourselves now? ;)
Yup :)
Watch out for my opinion piece "the artisan and the mass producer" in
next month's
On Sep 11, 2007, at 2:16 AM, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Quoting "Tee G. Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
If it's decorative image, why not make it to background image?
This is
most appropriate way to handle it, and you don't need to worry about
blank alt tag.
Depending on the situation, it's not a
>> For hand-crafted pages, done by a web artisan...
>Is that what we're calling ourselves now? ;)
Funny you mentioned it , I instantly googled it and checked if the
domain was available too sounds cool.
M. Jama
big:interactive
91 Princedale Road
Holland Park
London W11 4NS
Email: [
> tag. But I've
> also been told that the tag should be alt=" ", NOT alt="",
> because with
> no spaces (or one) the screen reader will announce 'blank'
> whereas with
> two spaces it remains silent.
David Dorward has already posted the definitive answer to your questions, so
I won't repeat
On 11/09/2007, Patrick H. Lauke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For hand-crafted pages, done by a web artisan...
Is that what we're calling ourselves now? ;)
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsu
Quoting Designer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
What is the current wisdom about the syntax of alt tags? I believe
that if I have a decorative image I am supposed to put a blank tag. But
I've also been told that the tag should be alt=" ", NOT alt="",
because with no spaces (or one) the screen reader wi
Quoting "Tee G. Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
If it's decorative image, why not make it to background image? This is
most appropriate way to handle it, and you don't need to worry about
blank alt tag.
Depending on the situation, it's not always possible to add images as
non-repeating CSS. For i
On 11 Sep 2007, at 10:00, Mohamed Jama wrote:
First of all isn't ALT an attribute not a TAG?
Yes, it is.
(but see Part 5 of "NOT the comp.text.sgml FAQ" http://
www.flightlab.com/~joe/sgml/faq-not.txt :)
1. When should one use an empty tag?
I don't think you should empty attribute to st
Hi Bob,
Excellent question and I am sure you are going to receive many different
answers which may confuse the matter more!!
>From my point of view I would suggest any decorative images should be styled
as CSS background images, granted this brings with it the issue of losing
it's place within th
Thank you for your email. I shall be away from the office between September 8th
and September 17th. If your enquiry is urgent, then please call my assistant on
01749 676798 in my absence.
Kind regards,
Nick Roper
***
List Guide
Hi Bob,
On Sep 11, 2007, at 1:42 AM, Designer wrote:
What is the current wisdom about the syntax of alt tags? I believe
that if I have a decorative image I am supposed to put a blank tag.
If it's decorative image, why not make it to background image? This
is most appropriate way to handl
Hey all,
First of all isn't ALT an attribute not a TAG?
> 1. When should one use an empty tag?
I don't think you should empty attribute to start with, its all noted
down in your DTD if you open it up for example the strict.dtd and search
through you'll find this paragraph
> What is th
Thank you for your email. I shall be away from the office between September 8th
and September 17th. If your enquiry is urgent, then please call my assistant on
01749 676798 in my absence.
Kind regards,
Nick Roper
***
List Guide
14 matches
Mail list logo