El vie, 05-03-2004 a las 00:54, Hugh Todd escribió:
Tonico,
I need to support IE/Mac, so what would you recommend me to do?
Did you have a look at this one, posted by Manuel González Noriega? It
seems to work in IE 5 Mac, for whatever reason:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Tonico,
I guess they don't use lists for the top navigation because it is
horizontal and they want to keep it simple.
Well, why ever they did it, it's not an argument for or against lists, I think. (Also, they don't use subnavigations)
You're right it's not an
Manuel González Noriega wrote:
FWIW, yesterday we put kalsey's tabs to work at http://derallyes.com
(homepage,top box) The site's in spanish, but that shouldn't make
checking the tabs functionality any harder ;)
Great work.
Now, what we'd really like to have is to enhance the tabs for js enabled
El jue, 04-03-2004 a las 03:38, Jackie Reid escribió:
And don't get me started on dls ;)
this bit seems to have been swept under the carpet..
I'm really interested to hear what is wrong with dl's for navigation as,
to my pedantic and not so up there with css sort of a mind, it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Tonico, hello list,
Is it just fashionable to use uls for navigation? Which standard says
that a navigation should be a list?
Who benefits from more semantic /navigation/?
Well, some say: a navigation semantically is a list, others say: it's not. (I also think,
Tonico,
I need to support IE/Mac, so what would you recommend me to do?
Did you have a look at this one, posted by Manuel González Noriega? It
seems to work in IE 5 Mac, for whatever reason:
http://kalsey.com/tools/csstabs/index.php?section=2
-Hugh
Hugh Todd wrote:
Did you have a look at this one, posted by Manuel González Noriega?
Yes, but I can't use it because it has 'display: inline' on lis and
that would make it more difficult for me because I have rounded corners.
Tonico
--
Tonico Strasser ?:-)
http://Tonico.FreeZope.org
Manuel González Noriega wrote:
El mié, 03-03-2004 a las 16:54, Tonico Strasser escribió:
Version a) may look better from a semantic point of view, and version b)
is probably better for textbrowsers, screenreaders etc? Version b) is
also easier for styling with CSS IMO.
I can see no problems
El mié, 03-03-2004 a las 19:05, Tonico Strasser escribió:
Thanks Manuel,
I wonder if version b is less accessible or standards compliant than
version a. It would be much easier for me to use version b.
If it validates, it's not less standard compliant than anything. As for
Manuel González Noriega wrote:
Who benefits from more semantic /navigation/? Maybe a XSLT designer?
Call me a pervert but i get a kick from elegant html sources :D
Ok, me too.
Thanks to all for your replies.
Tonico
--
Tonico Strasser ?:-)
http://Tonico.FreeZope.org
Contact_Tonico at Yahoo
Tonico Strasser wrote:
Who benefits from more semantic /navigation/? Maybe a XSLT designer?
the only benefits are: you have the data in it's natural form and
semantic markup is automatically perfectly accessible (the only problem
would be a stupid (sorry) ua like jaws, but even that is easily
Michael Zeltner wrote:
Tonico Strasser wrote:
Who benefits from more semantic /navigation/? Maybe a XSLT designer?
the only benefits are: you have the data in it's natural form and
semantic markup is automatically perfectly accessible (the only problem
would be a stupid (sorry) ua like jaws,
Tonico Strasser wrote:
Please, can you tell me more about the problem with Jaws and how it can
be fixed?
floats instead of inline elements for navigation. jaws uses ie, and ie
renders it as inline element so jaws will read it as inline element.
floated blocks (btw, can one float list elements?)
Mock Orange Web Site Development
1st Floor
92 Victoria Street
MACKAY Q 4740
Ph: 07 4953 4035
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Martin Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 5:44 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Semantic vs Accessibile markup
14 matches
Mail list logo
