Manuel González Noriega wrote:
El mié, 03-03-2004 a las 16:54, Tonico Strasser escribió:
Version a) may look better from a semantic point of view, and version b) is probably better for textbrowsers, screenreaders etc? Version b) is also easier for styling with CSS IMO.
I can see no problems with version a) at all.
I want a horizontal graphical navigation like at amazon.com. I find it very hard for styling with CSS.
front (never heard screenreaders et al have any problem with nested lists) neither for styling,
Ok, version a has no problems with accessibility but what about version b?
with well known references such 'Taming
Lists' at ALA or Listtutorial at css.maxdesign.au (too lazy to check the
URLs now :)
I know them, but no one has a submenu. Maybe beacause it is too difficult?
Tonico
-- Tonico Strasser ?:-) http://Tonico.FreeZope.org
Contact_Tonico at Yahoo dot de Check out http://www.WebProducer.at ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *****************************************************
