Well.. the standards are pretty clear on this subject:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/xhtml-media-types.html#media-types
http://www.w3.org/International/articles/serving-xhtml/
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xhtml1-20020801/#guidelines
among I can quote stuff like this:
XHTML documents
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:23:43 +1100,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't agree
with people encouraging content developers to deliver XHTML as text/html.
I wondered what other memebrs on the list thought about it and its
implications?
The problem from my point is the lack of
]
susan.rgrossman@cc:
gmail.com Subject: Re: [WSG] discussion
at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME
: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME
Well.. the standards are pretty clear on this subject:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/xhtml-media-types.html#media-types
http://www.w3.org/International/articles/serving-xhtml/
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xhtml1-20020801
I have been following this discussion (belatedly)
It's all in the MIME
http://www.juicystudio.com/all-in-the-mime.asp
first paragraph:
There have been a lot of articles recently about web
standards; in particular, using XHTML and serving it as
text/html. Personally, I'm not that
After reading this (http://www.juicystudio.com/all-in-the-mime.asp) my
beliefs in XHTML has been shaked.
What is this all about? Is it a bad practice to serve XHTML as
text/html? is it harmful? what are the disvantages?
The thuth is I cant understand what is this all about, and I didnt
really
: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME
Richard Czeiger wrote:
According to W3C, 'application/xhtml+xml' is the MIME type to use.
I've put it pages and seen it not only validate, but also display
correctly
in IE5.0 and IE6.
If IE displayed the page, rather than prompt you
Is anyone aware of a good reference on configuring Apache to serve the
files as the correct MIME type? Something in English would be good - a
system administrator I'm not! Does it need to be set up in a per-site
basis (as they're all set up as Virtual Hosts.) I'm assuming this can
be done with
]
Sent: Thu 11-Nov-04 11:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject:Re: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME
Aha! NOW i get it!
Thanks Patrick. I guess with people telling you to put inline scripts as
text/JavaScript and CSS as text/css I just assumed that the meta
Richard Czeiger wrote:
Thanks Patrick. I guess with people telling you to put inline scripts as
text/JavaScript and CSS as text/css I just assumed that the meta would
take care of it
A similar problem can be seen when CSS is erroneously sent as text/plain
or text/html by some badly configured
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been following this discussion (belatedly)
It's all in the MIME
http://www.juicystudio.com/all-in-the-mime.asp
first paragraph:
There have been a lot of articles recently about web standards; in
particular, using XHTML and serving it as text/html. Personally, I'm
Jason Foss wrote:
Is anyone aware of a good reference on configuring Apache to serve the
files as the correct MIME type? Something in English would be good - a
system administrator I'm not! Does it need to be set up in a per-site
basis (as they're all set up as Virtual Hosts.) I'm assuming this
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME
You can use PHP to output header information, and also to do content
negotiation. I don't know code for it off the top of my head, but Google
probably would turn up something.
Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
On 11 nov 2004, at 01.40, Jason Foss wrote:
Is anyone aware of a good reference on configuring Apache to serve the
files as the correct MIME type? Something in English would be good - a
system administrator I'm not! Does it need to be set up in a per-site
basis (as they're all set up as Virtual
14 matches
Mail list logo
