lucky it's a promo :p
From: Sean M. Hall (Dante) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] IE 7 Promo Images
Date: 8 Jun 2004 03:39:27 +
Hey guys. Yerba Buena Web Design (my own small design agency, which hasn't
even officially opened yet) has created
Phillips, Wendy wrote:
The page that opens in the new window has a number of anchor links -
this is just one of them. I've tried changing to different anchors and
the same problem occurs, unless it is the last anchor on the page and
there is no where else for the window to shift to. I can only
You can get clever and offer abbreviations and such - I believe the
attribute is 'abbr'? - but I don't have an URL handy.
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/tables.html#h-11.2.6
Patrick
Patrick H. Lauke
Webmaster / University of Salford
Im having trouble understanding how you think IE7 would be broken?!
you're obviously missing the point. this refers to the .htc/behaviour
based hack stylesheet to get the current IE to behave in a more
standards-compliant way http://dean.edwards.name/IE7/
(but see, that's what happens when
On 5 Jun 2004, at 12:44, Roger Johansson wrote:
No. Styling form elements the same across platforms and browsers is
not possible, since several browsers use the operating system's native
widgets, and ignore most attempts at styling them.
That's right. A particular example is the file upload box,
It seems to me that the web developer/designer community spends a huge
amount of time whinging about the browser developers and their product's
non-compliance, when the answer to the problem lies in their own hands.
Our apparent willingness to jump through testing/bug-fix hoops because of
the
Hi !
Hope you can help with my latest site at
http://www.smartpage.dk/HBW/underwear.php?
The submenu under SPAR 10% og KONTAKT, is placed behind the images, and
this is only occuring in Internet Explorer... - and this is obviously not
what it is menat to be!
I think it has some to do with the
Am 08.06.2004 um 05:39 schrieb Sean M. Hall (Dante):
http://www.geocities.com/seanmhall2003/ie7.html
I'd like your opinion on these two images (please remember that I'm a
beginner at design).
it crashes my safari for some reason?
regards, michael
PS: it would be nice if you'd use plain text
It seems to me that the web developer/designer community spends a huge
amount of time whinging about the browser developers and
their product's
non-compliance, when the answer to the problem lies in their
own hands.
The onus is shared between content developers, browser developers, users
Hi all,
Sorry for the basic question but I am new to making DIVs behave. I am
converting my old site from tables to DIVs and trying to get a similar
look.
The page troubling me is: http://www.blackwork.com/test/sample.html
The CSS is at: http://www.blackwork.com/test/stitches.css - the rules
Hi Rosie,
The div's not misbehaving, it's the floated image ... but that's how
floats are meant to work.
Clearing the float by adding dl { clear:both; } to your stylesheet will
give you what you want.
Cheers,
Mike
On Tuesday, June 8, 2004, at 11:46 PM, Rosie Norwood wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry for
Subject: Re: [WSG] Help with making DIVs behave
Hi Rosie,
The div's not misbehaving, it's the floated image ... but that's how
floats are meant to work.
Clearing the float by adding dl { clear:both; } to your stylesheet will
give you what you want.
Cheers,
Mike
On Tuesday, June 8, 2004,
On Tuesday, June 8, 2004, at 08:11 PM, Giles Clark wrote:
snip
Isn't it about time we took a more active role in shaping the future of
browsers. We could clearly state that as a community we write/develop
for a
list of acceptable browsers which comply to standards (we're just
going to
have to
Title: RE: [WSG] Action to force browser developers to clean up their act
Had to reply to this one because I hear it repeated a lot and it's just not true.
People would change browsers if they kept on getting jumbled,
unreadable
pages.
I have worked in both large corporate and
If we are going to make sites that only work in certain browsers why not just
code to IE's standards and not bother with the obscure browsers like firefox
and opera. That way we don't need standards at all! I can have my marquee
tag back and my ActiveX controls - Ill be able to do all kinds of
Hello.
http://www.seoed.com/
Please take a look at my site and tell me what you think. :)
I would like some more opinions regarding usability and accessibility.
I look forward for your feedback. Site in 90% finished.
*
The discussion list for
On Wednesday, June 9, 2004, at 01:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we are going to make sites that only work in certain browsers why
not just
code to IE's standards and not bother with the obscure browsers like
firefox
and opera. That way we don't need standards at all! I can have my
hi ther Razvan
I'll talk about the visual design
your navigation bar hmm need to rethink about it
i
On Sun, 08 Jun 2003 18:47:36 +0300, Razvan Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
http://www.seoed.com/
Please take a look at my site and tell me what you think. :)
I would like some
Title: RE: [WSG] www.seoed.com - Please review
Hey,
This is really great, well done man! It looks all there to me usability and accessibility wise, I'll leave it to the bigger guns to find the nitty grittys with it.
I'm happy with it though! Take care.
Jamie Mason: Design
-Original
Title: RE: [WSG] Action to force browser developers to clean up their act
Hi,
I'd be happiest if an IE7.x came that was completely standards compliant and auto updated itself (without a facility to disable this) and if MS wanted to add any exclusive extras then they did, but that everything
Rarvan,
Two quick points:
1. Please use % or ems for stating font-size.
2. Please separate adjacent links with a printable character. Or recode them as a
list.
Nice site keep it up.
mike 2k:)2
-Original Message-
From: Razvan Pop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 June 2003 16:48
Mike Foskett wrote:
Rarvan,
Two quick points:
1. Please use % or ems for stating font-size.
2. Please separate adjacent links with a printable character. Or recode them as a
list.
You are talking about the bottom navigation?
Nice site keep it up.
mike 2k:)2
-Original Message-
From:
My comments are mainly about the interface:
Can I suggest you use a list for the navigation bar at top? You have
for the one at bottom...
Maybe a bit more contrast in that navbar? even a bit more padding
around the words themselves?
You might like to look at the way the word 'SEOed' is
hmm
well its bad idea to use table in my case.
I'll try to find a better way to list my hosting plans
maybe boxes module
ah its hard to build a good site heh
Thank you folks
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 09:34:58 +0100, Patrick Lauke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can get clever and offer
Title: RE: [WSG] Action to force browser developers to clean up their act
If we are talking IE: Isnt the
problem is that Microsoft is going to integrate its next version of IE directly
into its operating system, which maybe an issue unto itself? Right or
wrong they dont want to spend the
On 6/8/04 2:21 PM, Nancy Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we are talking IE: Isn¹t the problem is that Microsoft is going to
integrate its next version of IE directly into its operating system, which
maybe an issue unto itself? Right or wrong they don¹t want to spend the money
to patch or
Hi,
I just registered webstandardsgroup.se, a potential Swedish
sister-site to webstandardsgroup.org. Got some ideas for it already,
would be glad to recieve others too (preferably off-list). I'll keep
you posted later on when ideas start to take more shape.
cheers,
/Anton
--
What your body
Any more thoughts on this one please ?
-Original Message-
From: Bert Doorn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 8 June 2004 11:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] Ordered list mark-up
G'day
Well, the specs appear to have provision for it. Unfortunately the vast majority
Nick,
No, no - I'm not suggesting for a second we should *only* develop for
IE, or any other certain browsers! Just the opposite - I make a point
of delivering my clients' message to the maximum number of visitors.
And I'm not bitter; just realistic. That's why I say 'IE is here to
stay'.
Nancy Johnson wrote:
their users use. It would take a special interest group, maybe one for
some disability, to publicize that using IE is inaccessible to them, and
since IE is fairly accessible to most groups, I dont see that happening.
At Sydney's April WSG meeting Checking for Web Access
The first step should be a clear and unequivocal statement that we
will not
write fixes for new non-compliant browsers. Design a new Browser by all
means, but make it compliant.
By non-compliant you mean that they do not adhere to the standards
put down by the W3C whose role is the development
On Wednesday, June 9, 2004, at 10:26 AM, Peter Firminger wrote:
Could it be that your site is broken, not the browser? We don't have
any
trouble accommodating IE with standards compliant code. I think your
taking
the argument too far and blaming the tool.
There are very few issues remaining if
I think the design is great, very clean and easy to read. My only thought as far as
standards go is that for the title 'SEOed.com' you could use:
h1span class=oneSeo/spanspan class=oneed/spanspan
class=one.com/span/h1
instead of an image and format the text with CSS, using some spans to
Any more thoughts on this one please ?
My only comment is that the CSS solution
provided isn't widely supported across commonly used browsers (like IE
and Moz). This was highlighted in the original post of the solution.
There is no other automatic way I can
see of doing what you want (other
I think you should take out sitemap button from main navigation.
Also this page http://www.seoed.com/glossary is pretty long and you don't
have back to top button.
It's clean and simple and I'll give you my $0.02..
regards,
jazz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
On Wednesday, June 9, 2004, at 01:51 PM, Michael Donnermeyer wrote:
The Chapters are in an unordered list that's displayed inline and
floated to the left. Of course the more proper browsers (Safari,
Mozillas, Opera, IE-Mac) are handling everything correctly...IE Win
however has decided to be
This thread is now closed. Please put up your editors on the WSG website
in the category provided. I've provided instructions on how to do this
in a previous post.
regards
James
Michael Donnermeyer wrote:
On the Macs I usually use either Dreamweaver MX 2004 (code view) or
BBEdit 7.1 for all my
37 matches
Mail list logo
