As you have sizes set for the containers it is easy to centre the text
vertically:
to #column2-header h2 add line-height: 50px;
to #column2-footer h2 add line-height: 30px;
my previous comments where about horiziontally aligning the text (late friday
afternoon brain fade)
Nick
This email is
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 12:37:40AM -0400, Anthony Timberlake wrote:
I was just blogging about why I think IE is a lost cause and
Where to?
Ángel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Martin,
On 10/7/05, Martin Jopson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could anyone please clarify the situation for Meta Keywords and also Meta
Description. If possible also a web resource that states clearly these
issues.
Others have already given a range of good responses. To add to the
discussion
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 17:30:16 +0800, Kay Smoljak wrote:
Others have already given a range of good responses. To add to the
discussion I believe that the search engine Sensis uses the meta
keywords tag, although I cannot remember where I picked up that idea.
Yep, it seems they do - googling shows
Well, I just had it pointed out to me (You're an evil man, Bert ;))
that we really haven't managed to bring this one on-topic, so I think
the thread should be closed.
Lea
~ oops
--
WSG Core member
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 20:52:35 +1000, Lea de Groot wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 17:30:16 +0800, Kay
Hi folks:
I'm trying to test out a template and I'm not sure if I'm executing
this properly. It's a standard template basically but I've had to do
some things that make me wonder if there is a better way. The
content rectangle (everything inside of the very light gray shadow
effect) is
Hi everyone,
OK, the extreme tracker is now working.
Last time I posted, the xhtml valid tracker was
working on some pages and not others. What I
discovered was that the pages with older trackers
wouldn't track with the valid code. I hadn't realized
initially that there were different versions
Hi,
I've observed an inconsistent problem on my site with
Internet Explorer. Basically, in the upper left area
of the main (white) section a gray box that varies in
size will appear occassionally. The box disappears
when scrolling down then up again. Slight variations
of this problem appear on
Andrew Krespanis wrote:
On 10/8/05, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry, but this doesn't make sense at all. Or is there an
important detail I'm missing? ;)
Yes, you're missing the part where this was written over 12 months ago
That's totally irrelevant. If 2 days ago you
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
I have yet to see a good browser with solid CSS support, so
solid doesn't mean flawless. I am not that naive ;)
I don't think we can say completely no to CSS hacks anytime soon. But
of course; this depends on how we define hacks, so it's well worth
trying.
That
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
That sentance leaves too many doors opened so I won't go there, but
FWIW, I don't agree with you ;)
Should there be a 'dis' in that sentence? Or? :-)
;)
I like the chaotic mess we get when all doors are opened. Leaves me
with a lot more options.
I know. That's
Hello all.
I just finished a site and it looks ok in IE 6 / FF / Opera. I'm not
too concerned about compatibility with older browsers, just wondering
if it works ok in Mac and Linux. The site is here:
http://color.rdpdesign.com
Any advice is also welcome.
Thanks!-- - C Montoyardpdesign.com ...
Hi Christian,
I checked out your site in Safari 1.3.1,
Firefox (Mac) 1.0.6, IE 5.2 Camino 0.8.2 on 1024 x 768.
The page renders nicely in all browser
except for IE 5.2. The layout is shot in this browser. I wouldnt be too
concerned about this, as IE 5.2 is a real pig to design for,
Christian Montoya wrote:
I just finished a site and it looks ok in IE 6 / FF / Opera. I'm not too
concerned about compatibility with older browsers, just wondering if it
works ok in Mac and Linux. The site is here: http://color.rdpdesign.com
The ads are overlaying the content on FF 1.0.5 and
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
IMO, hasLayout is a tough concept to grab. I think experiencing the
result of the implementation of this fix is enough feedback for most
people. It works or it doesn't.
You sure got that wrong. Please, don't repeat it to others - they may
believe you.
AFAIK,
Hey all, Thanks for the checks. The problems come from the page being sized in em's, and the ads being absolutely positioned with ems... I've decided that's too difficult. I'll probably put the ads back in, but in a more robust way, so they don't risk covering content.
-- - C Montoyardpdesign.com
Not strictly DC, but along a similar vein... don't suppose anyone knows
if any/many search engines take ICBM meta data or geo.position meta data
into account when determining local content?
I ask because, whilst Google is generally pretty good with localised
versions (my personal site[1] is a
Just wanted to clarify this area with some references.
Meta keywords - no - no search engine publically acknowdges that they refer to them.
Meta descriptions - yes - see below - but DMoz is often a factor as well
Meta robots - yes - see below
1. you can use robots.txt OR meta robots:
[quote]Use
Good morning all,
I just launched my site's redesign (www.webnetdesignstudios.com), and although
I'm pleased with the
initial results I'm still addressing a few bugs. The one that bothers me the
most is the fact that
the main menu (i.e. our company, services, portfolio, etc.) collapses and
19 matches
Mail list logo
