Hi,
I am thinking to change:
A Document Type Definition is an XML schema language and defines a
set of declarations that conform to a particular markup syntax.
to simply read:
A Document Type Definition defines a set of declarations that conform
to a particular markup syntax.
It removes any
Lynne,
on Tuesday, January 10, 2006 at 04:19 wsg@webstandardsgroup.org wrote:
On 1/10/06, Martin Heiden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Document Type Definitions were AFAIK first used by SGML and later
for defining XML and XHTML. Because of the limitations of the DTD
Language XML Schema has been
Karl,
on Tuesday, January 10, 2006 at 10:34 wsg@webstandardsgroup.org wrote:
A Document Type Definition defines a set of declarations that conform
to a particular markup syntax.
That's much better!
regards
Martin
**
The discussion
On Jan 9, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Seona Bellamy wrote:Can anyone who is running a larger resolution than 1024x768 please have a look and tell me if the layout is holding up? Sorry no time to peek, but I am using this on a current project...#sizer {width:_expression_(document.body.clientWidth 1554 ?
Title: Message
Can anyone who is running a
larger resolution than 1024x768 please have a look and tell me if the layout is
holding up?
Looks
good at 1600-1000px. Scrollbar appears at 999px.
-Nigel
Hello list,
For the college I am working for I am looking for new helpdesk
software for internal use on the college intranet. However I am unable
to find any solution that's based on webstandards, the code on all
software that we've come across is horribly and I would spent too much
time cleaning
Hi Sander
I had to develop my own in c# asp.net2.0 to ensure standards
compatability. This uses IIS, .net framwork 2.0 and sqlServer 2000.
It didn't take all that long as really it was a request tracking system
rather than a full blown intranet solution. But .net 2.0 is easy to
shape into valid
Maybe http://www.edgewall.com/trac/? It depends on the functionality
and features you need.
--
Jan Brasna :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com | www.wdnews.net
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
If it's for internal use then you must have a fairly standard platform
for it to run on (I'm guessing windows 2000 or XP machines with IE6) in
that case web standards would be a fairly low priority as you have such
a common interface to work with.
Samuel
http://www.seasonstravel.com.au
On 10/01/06, Samuel Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it's for internal use then you must have a fairly standard platform
for it to run on (I'm guessing windows 2000 or XP machines with IE6) in
that case web standards would be a fairly low priority as you have such
a common interface to
Your confusing web accessibility with web standards, a page can be valid
XHTML while not being accessible, likewise this works in reverse.
You are joking of course? What about *employees* present or future
with disabilities?
**
The
Samuel Richardson wrote:
Your confusing web accessibility with web standards, a page can be valid
XHTML while not being accessible, likewise this works in reverse.
I believe that Karl rightly meant web standards in the wider sense. It's
not just the syntax side (valid XHTML, CSS layout) but
Hi,
I'm having problem with background image for a:hover and IE
CSS
#header-image img{float:left;}
#header a:hover{position:absolute;width:410px; z-index:10;
background:transparent
url(http://www.jadmadi.net/blog/wp-content/themes/almost-spring/images/home.jpg)
no-repeat top left;
Forgive me, but that seems to be a complicated way of doing things...
Why not break the image up into 2 parts and make the entire left half
an a:href with css hover? The absolute positioning doesn't seem
necessary.
--Zachary On 1/10/06, Jad Madi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,I'm having problem
I am aware that #151; is an incorrect character entity for the em dash,
that the correct entity is #8212;.
But I was mucking about on the W3C Character entity references in HTML 4
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/sgml/entities.html
and noted that the named entity references are now linked to
On 11/01/06, Thomas Livingston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 9, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Seona Bellamy wrote:
Can anyone who is running a larger resolution than 1024x768 please have a look and tell me if the layout is holding up?
Sorry no time to peek, but I am using this on a current
On 11/01/06, Duckworth, Nigel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone who is running a
larger resolution than 1024x768 please have a look and tell me if the layout is
holding up?
Looks
good at 1600-1000px. Scrollbar appears at 999px.
-Nigel
Thanks Nigel. That's exactly where the
On 10/01/06, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the help Seona,I followed the advice in the URL you sent me andeverything works great. Well, sorta...Adjusting the height created another issue in Opera 8.It's no longer displaying the background image for
#sitewrapper. I'm not sure if it's a
Hi Kat,
On 11 Jan 2006 at 10:29, Kat wrote:
I am aware that #151; is an incorrect character entity for the em dash,
that the correct entity is #8212;.
#151 is definitivly wrong or very, very old.
http://www.sql-und-xml.de/unicode-database/latin-1-supplement.html
lists it as 'END OF
Seona Bellamy wrote:
#sizer {width:expression(document.body.clientWidth 1554 ? 402px :
75% );}
would it be possible for someone to translate that expression into plain
english for me
Hi Seona
Hope this clarifies.
The expression says:
If the body/viewport[1] width is greater than 1554px then
#sizer {width:_expression_(document.body.clientWidth
1554 ? 402px : 75% );}
I would prefer not to have to fiddle with the proportions of the
buttons just for IE, so would it be possible for someone to translate
that _expression_ into plain english for me so I can fiddle with the
numbers
On 11/01/06, Kat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it safe to use the named references that formerly refered to the control
characters?
Multi level answer here:
- text/html: Should be perfectly safe.
- application/xhtml+xml: Should be, but isn't, safe except for the
five named entities of XML. Use
liorean wrote:
On 11/01/06, Kat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it safe to use the named references that formerly refered to the control
characters?
Yes, it's safe to use the named entity references in HTML4, but it's
easier to just use UTF-8 and type the actual characters instead.
mdash; (or
On Jan 10, 2006, at 1:34 AM, Karl Dawson wrote:
Hi,
I am thinking to change:
A Document Type Definition is an XML schema language and defines a
set of declarations that conform to a particular markup syntax.
to simply read:
A Document Type Definition defines a set of declarations that
The company I work for is moving our hosting systems to Plesk. One of
the tasks that will probably fall to me is adding some of our branding
to the Control Panel interface itself. I've worked with the HSphere
control panel system in the past and customizing the look and feel has
been a nightmare -
Thanks Scott and Paulo, those were excellent definitions. I understand it a lot better now. So back to fiddling for a while.
Cheers,
Seona.
I am looking for some ideas on how to create a
_javascript_/CSS fly-out menu, the dreaded
day has come that a client finally insisted on using one!
I need to custom write it because it needs to be
integrated with a CMS.I started working on the structure (see below)I'd like to generate the
PS. it needs to be able to accommodate several sub
links.
Kind
regards,
Taco Fleur - CEOPacific Fox http://www.pacificfox.com.au an
industry leader with commercial IT experience since 1994
Web Design and
Development
SMS Solutions, including developer
API
Domain
Taco Fleur - Pacific Fox wrote:
I am looking for some ideas on how to create a JavaScript/CSS fly-out menu,
the dreaded day has come that a client finally insisted on using one!
...
var menu = new Object();
menu[ about_bdsrecruit ] = new Object();
Yikes! Don't generate a menu like that,
Hi Taco,If you will do everything in _javascript_, then your menu will lost its semantic. Take a look how it is done on http://www.optuszoo.com.auThere is _javascript_ for delay, CSS for drop-downs and ulli for semantic.
best regards,Dmitry
I had a look at Suckerfish Dropdowns but it seems to go only one level deep,
I need several levels deep.
Kind regards,
Taco Fleur - CEO
Pacific Fox http://www.pacificfox.com.au an industry leader with commercial
IT experience since 1994 .
*
Web Design and Development
*
31 matches
Mail list logo
