Hello Nic,
It's what I thought ... but this is not what I implementend! Need to change
that: http://www.fastwrite.be/glossary.php?letter=a
Thanks again,
Pat
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Nic
Sent: jeudi 19 janvier 2006 22:16
To: wsg@
Thanks for the sample Juergen. ;-)
Cheers,
Pat
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Juergen Auer
Sent: jeudi 19 janvier 2006 22:31
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Glossary
Hello Pat,
On 19 Jan 2006 at 22:06, Pat Boens wrote
Thanks Joshua. It's what I thought ... But it's not what I have implementend
so far. Need to change that: http://www.fastwrite.be/glossary.php?letter=a
Thanks again,
Pat
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Joshua Street
Sent: jeudi 19 janvier
On 1/20/06, heretic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have just discovered the 'small screen rendering' tool in Firefox (web
> > developer toolbar). Am I right in thinking this is an attempt to show
> > what a site looks like on a mobile device or similar? Is it a good
> > guide? etc.
>
> That's t
On IIS you can use server side includes in a ".htm" file.Do this: Open IIS - website (righ button) - properties - home directory - configuration - Add. So, you will associate the .dll asp to .htm extension like this:
Executable: C:\WINDOWS\system32\inetsrv\asp.dll
> I have just discovered the 'small screen rendering' tool in Firefox (web
> developer toolbar). Am I right in thinking this is an attempt to show
> what a site looks like on a mobile device or similar? Is it a good
> guide? etc.
That's the theory, but with the vagaries of handheld/small screen
> Thankfully, Explorer isn't the only HH browser ;-)
Ya, but... If you want your visitors to see the site properly, considering
the majority of HH ship with IE, you can't expect them know how to change
browsers. They rarely do on their PC to start with, on the HH is even worse
;)
Cheers
Nic
*
On 20 Jan 2006, at 10:37 AM, Nic wrote:
For example, even if you declare a stylesheet for media=handheld,
Explorer
for the handheld will still use some of the screen stylesheet. This
makes
it near impossible designing a proper style for handhelds.
Thankfully, Explorer isn't the only HH br
> The impression I'm getting from the replies today are "title" as an
> attribute, has inconsistent interpretation by most UA's. However, as
> an element it is essential to the document. Is this interpretation
> correct?
Steve's article would back up your comment that the title attribute is
incons
Thanks,
The impression I'm getting from the replies today are "title" as an
attribute, has inconsistent interpretation by most UA's. However, as
an element it is essential to the document. Is this interpretation
correct?
Respectfully,
Christopher Kennon
Principal & Creative Director
The flexibility of the title attribute (as opposed to the title element) can
be seen in the ever-exciting W3 technical reports. Two places that are
always a great read, and full of surprises are the "List of attributes" [1]
and "List of elements" [2].
The list of attributes shows the title and has
> Am I right in thinking this is an attempt to show what a site looks like
on a mobile device or similar?
Ayup :)
> Is it a good guide? etc.
Well, yes and no. The problem is that so many of the browsers for
handhelds/mobiles aren't rendering content the same way (familiar story).
For exam
Hello Pat,
On 19 Jan 2006 at 22:06, Pat Boens wrote:
> What would be the best way to create a glossary: a table ? a
> definition list? something else?
I had created a glossary with a definition list.
(simple) sample:
http://www.sql-und-xml.de/regex/glossar.html
Regards,
Juergen Auer
---
Hello Pat,
You asked:
> What would be the best way to create a glossary: a table ?
> a definition list? something else?
Answers.com gives the following definition for glossary:
"A list of often difficult or specialized words with their definitions,
often placed at the back of a book."
I think t
Definition list. It's a list of definitions ;-)
On 1/20/06, Pat Boens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> What would be the best way to create a glossary: a table ? a definition
> list? something else?
>
> Thanks for your expert input.
> Pat
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0
Hi
All,
What would be the
best way to create a glossary: a table ? a definition list? something
else?
Thanks for your
expert input.
Pat
Hi all,
I have just discovered the 'small screen rendering' tool in Firefox (web
developer toolbar). Am I right in thinking this is an attempt to show
what a site looks like on a mobile device or similar? Is it a good
guide? etc.
Any info much appreciated - it looks as though it's a great
On 1/19/06, Chris Kennon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My understanding of the title element appears shallow. Usage of the
> title attribute within an Object , Frame and link is well documented.
> However, when I encountered it with Some Text p> my was took on a wide-eyed look of embarrassme
Hi,
My understanding of the title element appears shallow. Usage of the
title attribute within an Object , Frame and link is well documented.
However, when I encountered it with Some Textp> my was took on a wide-eyed look of embarrassment, as I was unaware
of its usage in this context. Woul
On 16 Jan 2006, at 12:15, Svip wrote:
I thought that per standard you inserted the favicon.ico file in the
parent directory to the site, and thus browsers would ask for it, and
get it as they requested! The HTML is just if you specific pages on a
site that needs their own favicons!
As far as I
Miika Mäkinen escribió:
[...]
Anyways, what I need to do is to add a "onclick" event handler to some
links, and make this return false. My goal is that users with javascript
turned on would go somewhere else than users without. Now, I need the click
event to return false, so that javascript users
Thanks a lot!That's not exactly a bug, it's how it's supposed to work:http://www.gerd-riesselmann.net/archives/2005/04/firefox-canceling-problem-solved
On 1/19/06, Richard Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fair enough. Being a bit hast there wasn't i. However the support ofthe DOM2 Event handle
Miika,
Today is my quirksmode day ;-)
http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2005/10/_and_the_winner_1.html
http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/coding_techniques/memory_leaks/index.html
I tend to use .onclick for attaching events to links, because it has
fewer cross browser issues than the
Fair enough. Being a bit hast there wasn't i. However the support of
the DOM2 Event handlers standards is still incomplete so as far i know
and Mozilla apperas to have a bug with the return value. That may be
your problem.
http://www.gerd-riesselmann.net/archives/2005/03/a-firefox-javascript-bug
.onclick works as I said before... I was just under impression that onclick is not a preferred way of setting event handlers.Also, I wrote this also as I think that AddEventHandler SHOULD work? Shoudln't it?
On 1/19/06, Joshua Street <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/19/06, Richard Stephenson <[EMAIL
On Jan 19, 2006, at 11:15, Justin Carter wrote:
If the response snippet of XHTML is valid once
inserted into the page (obviously it is never viewed by itself) then I
don't see where the argument is coming from. So am I missing
something?
Indeed, I always thought that having innerHTML not work f
On 1/19/06, Richard Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Use the onclick event;
>
> a.onclick = function() {
> alert('not going there!');return false;
> }
>
> Its not an issue of standards it's in the javascript not the html.
>
> Richard
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
# Imp
Use the onclick event;
a.onclick = function() {
alert('not going there!');return false;
}
Its not an issue of standards it's in the javascript not the html.
Richard
--
DonkeyMagic: Website design & development
http://www.donkeymagic.co.uk
**
Hi,I'm not sure if this is a right forum to ask this question, please tell me if it isn't...Anyways, what I need to do is to add a "onclick" event handler to some links, and make this return false. My goal is that users with _javascript_ turned on would go somewhere else than users without. Now, I
On 1/19/06, Joshua Street <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it? I'm using AHAH (H = HTML, as opposed to XML) to dynamically
> retrieve some content and innerHTML seems infinitely more sensible:
> ...
> innerHTML doesn't work with XHTML, etc,. I know... and it's not a DOM
> method... but do people con
Joshua,
on Wednesday, January 18, 2006 at 23:56 wsg@webstandardsgroup.org wrote:
> innerHTML doesn't work with XHTML, etc,. I know... and it's not a DOM
> method... but do people consider it okay to use when it seems
> otherwise impractical to use "standard" methods?
Do you know the discussions
31 matches
Mail list logo
