Hi Felix,
Here's a screenshot of a typical moderately high resolution
environment:
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/SS/SC/sc-alaclib1.jpg
and the setup source:
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/tmp/sc-alaclib1.html
Just a thought, but a moderately high resolution environment to me is
a setup of over 3mpx.
On 2008/02/25 10:31 (GMT-0500) Andrew Maben apparently typed:
> I'm almost done with a site redesign, and the time is right to ask
> for your opinions: http://beta.www.aclib.us
> for comparison, the current site is: http://www.aclib.us
...
> Of course accessibility is important, and this is wher
Does anyone have a preferred way to view and validate generated source
code? By
generated source I mean after Ajax, JavaScript, and so on have done their
magic.
I like the "view generated source" in the Web Developer Firefox plugin,
Firebug is very handy too
btw does anyone know how
Hi Chris
Thought I'd let you know - I looked at your web page and the first two
examples, when I clicked on the link, didn't work for me at all! No extra
paragraph appearing (or disappearing!) and no time change. I'm on a Mac
using Firefox 2.0.0.12 ...
It sounds good - I'd like to access a versio
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:44:13 -0800, jody tate wrote:
> Does anyone have a preferred way to view and validate generated source code?
> By
> generated source I mean after Ajax, JavaScript, and so on have done their
> magic.
>
>
[...]
>
>
> Yet viewing generated source in Firebug, that same meta t
Members of this list should be interested that the WCAG Samurai errata for
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 has been released.
http://wcagsamurai.org/
For those not familiar with the Samurai errata, it is alternative to the
FUBARed WCAG 2.0
For more information on what happened to WCAG
Hi Steven,
On Feb 26, 2008, at 6:49 AM, Steven Faulkner wrote:
don't know if this has been pointed out yet, but as far as screen
readers like JAWS and Window Eyes are concerned the strong element
does not convey any meaning. It is not recognised by them.
bottom line is that for users thes
There are a few plugins for firefox that does validation for you. Can't
remember the names of them offhand though. Sorry.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:44 AM, jody tate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have a preferred way to view and validate generated source
> code? By generated source I me
Thanks, Paul, for the suggestion.
Doctype, I don't think, is the issue. The doctype is set in the static
XHTML that the Ajax builds on as XHTML strict. However, most generated
source views remove the doctype, a phenomenon I asked about here: http://ask.metafilter.com/84314/Where-does-the-DTD-
Also a thank you for informing everyone that it is completed.
This tends not to happen a lot and people (like myself) see the message
a few days later and find that the site is taken down.
thanks,
William
Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote:
Hello all,
Thank you to all who volunteered. I owe you
Hi Jody,
I recall having a similar problem. The issue came down (from memory) to the
doctype I was using. I was closing elements in xhtml style, while the doctype I
was using was html.
Firefox was happily removing the extraneous closing elements in the rendered
source to fit the doctype.
:)
Does anyone have a preferred way to view and validate generated source
code? By generated source I mean after Ajax, JavaScript, and so on
have done their magic.
I'm asking because I'm working on a web application for browsing
network devices (close to 9000 routers, switches, WAPs, etc.) tha
Hello all,
Thank you to all who volunteered. I owe you one :)
I did actually extend the invitation to three people -- more the merrier,
right?
Cheers.
Mike
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
It might be worth testing on different platforms. Firefox 2.0 on Windows, OSX
and Linux. I belive there some times are some quirks that creeps up. All though
rare.
- Original Message -
From: Andrew WC Brown
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 3:28 PM
Hello all,
I am looking for a volunteer to check out a web site for me. I need another
set of eyes. This volunteer needs the following:
1) Access to an extra wide viewport (beyond 1024).
2) A solid knowledge of CSS so if a bug is found, together we might be able
to find a fix (you will be pro
Something quick I just thought of was that you could use some small icon
to indicate required fields, and specify the alt for that to say
"required". That way, sighted users don't have to look at the word
"required" repeated 50 times, while unsighted users will be able to hear
that the field is
This kind of testing is our core business, and I have to say that these days
there is very little difference when running a particular browser version on
different Windows versions.
One difference that comes to mind is that Windows 2000 has native 56-bit
encryption, and this is not increased even
don't know if this has been pointed out yet, but as far as screen readers
like JAWS and Window Eyes are concerned the strong element does not convey
any meaning. It is not recognised by them.
They do not change the way text within strong elements are announced, but
neither do they do it for or o
Good ideas Ben, thanks. I did think about that but went for the option which
means the least amount of work for the developer. I don't pretend that
Performer is suitable for really advanced stuff, just the basics. The reason I
hook the events into the a element is because it gives the developer
Hi WSG,
I'm testing a custom application to see if it works in different OS's and
Web Browsers.
My question is there any practical reason to test different OS when you can
download them on your current OS.
eg. W2K Internet Explorer 5.5 vs WXP Internet Explorer 5.5
I have multiple IE but is there r
Hi Matt,
I guess I would prefer verbose and have them fill the
form out once than have them have them misinterpret
and have to fix errors, [...]
I agree.
[...] which I imagine can be tedious
using a screen reader. Is this the case?
Can be a horror show. My understanding is that client side
Hi,
Although I'm a jQuery man myself, it's good to see someone actively
encouraging the use of unobtrusive javascript although I would make one or
two tweaks. Wouldn't it be better to add your class hooks to the p rather
than to an a as at present, if the user had javascript disabled then they
wo
Hi,
I've written a small set of helper functions that will allow you to
unobtrusively add JavaScript to a web page. It's built on the back off the
prototype library so you'll need that as well. See the details here:
http://www.stillbreathing.co.uk/projects/performer/performer.html
A couple of
Hi,
I'm out of the office Wed 27th - Fri 29th February. I'll be back on Monday 3rd
March.
Contact Joi Champion or Amelia Brennan for whereis.com questions.
Otherwise I will respond to your email upon my return.
Karen
Sensis. Australia's leading information resource.
Making complex liv
24 matches
Mail list logo
