Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

2008-06-18 Thread Maarten Stolte
definitely a mac thing, not sharing libraries like windows dll hell...

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 2:47 PM, russ - maxdesign [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Maybe a mac thing but I have have a variety of FF versions (as well as Moz,
 Opera, Safari, IE and Netscape versions) going back in time on one laptop
 and can open any as needed. The only limitation I've noticed with Moz
 related browsers is that you can only open one at a time.


 on 18/6/08 10:17 PM, Paul Collins at wrote:

 Does anyone know if it will replace your version of Firefox 2, or will
 it run side by side?!

 Cheers




 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] JS Image Slider

2008-04-29 Thread Maarten Stolte
Hi,

I  recently found this site for that;
http://billwscott.com/carousel/ , which btw is build upon Yahoo's YUI.

Let me know how it fares, as I still have to implement it myself for
my site as well.

regards,

Maarten

On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 3:21 PM, James Jeffery
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Im looking on creating an image slider. Basically a 400px x 200px box that
 you can slide along and reveal more images. They will hold the 'latest'
 image uploads. Each slide will have about 4-5 images, you scoll accross and
 you view more.

  I want to do this so that users without Javascript enabled can still see
 the images. Would it be best to create the box and to start with display the
 first 4-5 images and if JS is disabled then they get the first few. The
 images are selected at random from the new galleries.

 If the user has JS enabled then they can view all the images. There will be
 a limit of 15 images in the slider box. I can load the images into an array
 using PHP and then use JS to extract the images that wouldn't get displayed
 if the user has JS disabled.

 Anyone got any views on it? I was looking at the Yahoo Design Pattern for a
 similar thing.



 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] PHI and YUI Grids

2007-11-02 Thread Maarten Stolte
Hi Paul,

thanks for the links, it's nice that they are also a bit different in
design, so we have different examples.

regards,

Maarten

On Nov 2, 2007 1:07 AM, Paul Minty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Maarten,

 We've done a few, often with a couple of mods.

 www.vssmarthomes.com.au
 www.nyp.com.au (I think)
 www.wwwatertrucks.com

 The smaller the job, the more likely we are to use the YUI Grids as they
 are.

 Cheers
 Paul


 Paul Minty Director

 mintleaf studio
 We design  create stylish websites

 Post: Box 6 108 Flinders Street Melbourne VIC 3000
 Level 2 108 Flinders Street Melbourne
 T. 03 9662 9344
 F. 03 9662 9255
 M. 0418 307 475
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.mintleafstudio.com.au


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Maarten Stolte
 Sent: Wednesday, 31 October 2007 7:00 PM
 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
 Subject: Re: [WSG] PHI and YUI Grids

 Hi,

  We've been using the YUI for a while. We wrote our own variant to
  support the proportions that our Art Director likes to use, which
  include the Golden Mean.

 Can you show any examples of sites using it? I'm wanting to show our
 front end designer some examples.

 thanks,

 Maarten


 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***





 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] PHI and YUI Grids

2007-10-31 Thread Maarten Stolte
Hi,

 We've been using the YUI for a while. We wrote our own variant to
 support the proportions that our Art Director likes to use, which
 include the Golden Mean.

Can you show any examples of sites using it? I'm wanting to show our
front end designer some examples.

thanks,

Maarten


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Jquery and/or Yahoo UI

2007-10-12 Thread Maarten stolte
 On 12/10/2007, Simon Cockayne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Anyone using jQuery (http://jquery.com/) or Yahoo UI (
 http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/) ?

 Do they, help to, build nice Standards based apps?

 Am I going to see green lights* in Firefox for standards compliance,
 error-free CSS and Javascript...oh...and will the HTML and CSS validate?


 JavaScript libraries do not by themselves put errors in your CSS or HTML,
 only you - the user - can do that. :)

Not true. YUI is much more then a Javascript library, and it outputting
alot of HTML and CSS could (possibly!) make it break your valid pages.
I am using YUI, its very nice, but i've only been using it for some small
things and I did not yet validate them, and even if I had, it would not be
a guarantee for other parts of the library.
It *is* tested in alot of browsers for compatibility, which is maybe even
more important then standards compliance (sorry...).

regards,

Maarten


 If you consider WCAG a web standard, then you need to make sure that
 your
 page is still accessible when scripts are turned off (or words to that
 effect). Read our article that Alfonso linked to for an example of how
 jQuery can be applied.

 --




 Matthew Pennell //
 m: 07904 432123 //
 www.thewatchmakerproject.com


 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



[WSG] prettier forms

2007-09-14 Thread Maarten stolte
Hello,

I'm looking for pointers towards tutorials on how to make a form look
prettier; especially the selectbox/pulldown and checkboxes are of
interest.

Thanks for any help,

Maarten



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] prettier forms

2007-09-14 Thread Maarten stolte
Hello,

 As I recall those are controlled by the operating system so if you using
 MAC they will look nice shiny blue etc, hope that helped

yes they are normally by either OS or the browser, as are all form
elements, but most can be styled, using either CSS, a proprietary system
or by using tricks like drawing an image instead of the checkbox, and
hiding the checkbox.
I maybe didn't make myself clear, but I'm trying to find a good example of
these javascript/dom/css tricks to style those elements, and maybe others,
and by good example I mean available on as many browsers as possible,
standards based and with a good fallback to the normal elements if the
tricks don't work on a browser.

regards,

Maarten

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Maarten stolte
 Sent: 14 September 2007 14:29
 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
 Subject: [WSG] prettier forms

 Hello,

 I'm looking for pointers towards tutorials on how to make a form look
 prettier; especially the selectbox/pulldown and checkboxes are of
 interest.

 Thanks for any help,

 Maarten



 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***







***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] prettier forms

2007-09-14 Thread Maarten stolte
 Drop down lists I'm not so sure but check boxes and radio buttons
 definitely.

 They use JavaScript and CSS and it is a form of image replacement that is
 used.

 Here is one example:

 http://www.whatstyle.net/articles/18/pretty_form_controls_with_css

 But there are many out there and as long as your check boxes degrade to
 the
 default you will be fine.  So I suggest styling up your form using the
 defaults and use the example above to enhance the look of the form only.
 The example above uses CSS 3 pseudo classes but I believe he provides a
 suitable alternative if you don't want to use CSS 3.


thanks, it looks like a nice css exercise, but with IE support being
non-existant, and IE usage being everything but non-existant I think I
prefer using the image tricks with javascript.
As for the drop down boxes, I know that tricks exist for those, but I am
afraid that those might not be available with the limits I set earlier on.



 I hope this helps

 Jamie.



 On 14/09/2007, Mohamed Jama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 As I recall those are controlled by the operating system so if you using
 MAC they will look nice shiny blue etc, hope that helped

 M. Jama

 big:interactive
 91 Princedale Road
 Holland Park
 London W11 4NS
 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Direct: +44 (0)20 7313 2262
 www.biggroup.co.uk

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Maarten stolte
 Sent: 14 September 2007 14:29
 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
 Subject: [WSG] prettier forms

 Hello,

 I'm looking for pointers towards tutorials on how to make a form look
 prettier; especially the selectbox/pulldown and checkboxes are of
 interest.

 Thanks for any help,

 Maarten



 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] prettier forms

2007-09-14 Thread Maarten stolte
 Hi,

 Give this a go:
 http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=enq=css+for+forms+and+drop+down+menusmet
 a=

thanks,

but I'd like to style a form element select box, so would you suggest
adding a javascript event to these pulldowns instead of a link to trigger
a hidden value in the form, or..?

Maarten


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Maarten stolte
 Sent: 14 September 2007 14:29
 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
 Subject: [WSG] prettier forms

 Hello,

 I'm looking for pointers towards tutorials on how to make a form look
 prettier; especially the selectbox/pulldown and checkboxes are of
 interest.

 Thanks for any help,

 Maarten



 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***



 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***






***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] footer technique

2005-07-16 Thread Maarten Stolte




Hello,

Joshua Street wrote:

  I don't have a Mac either, but supposedly Konqueror and Safari use
similar rendering engines, so I tested in that instead.

It is indeed mildly broken, but certainly acceptable.  The footer will
render at the very bottom of the viewport on page load without any
problems, HOWEVER, if the user subsequently resizes the viewport (to
increase the vertical height), the footer will remain at the bottom most
point at which it last rendered.  This also occurs if the window is
resized upwards (e.g. vertical height is reduced) and then downwards
again (e.g. vertical height is increased/returned to "normal" size).

  

Why not just use the technique from Bobby van der Sluis, it works all
the time on dom enabled browsers;
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/footers/

Maarten Stolte 


  Nothing show-stopping.

Having said all that, no guarantees it's exactly the same as Safari...

On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 19:01 +0800, Kay Smoljak wrote:
  
  
Looks like someone has found a mostly-reliable CSS-only solution to
that common footer problem - getting a footer to stick to the bottom
of the viewport no matter how long or short the content is, which
doesn't overlap the content when the window is resized:

Explanation: http://solardreamstudios.com/learn/css/footerstick/
Example: http://solardreamstudios.com/_img/learn/css/footerstick/footerstick.html

Apparently it doesn't work in IE5 Mac or Safari. IE5 Mac I can mostly
live without, but Safari is a bit of a bugger. I don't have a Mac here
so I can't test - I'm curious as to whether it can be made to degrade
acceptably. Could someone with a Mac please check the test page?

Thanks!


  
  





[WSG] AJAX and accesibility

2005-06-29 Thread Maarten Stolte
Hello,

I'm trying to find out if there are any resources on AJAX and accesibility.
It seems to me that if I would employ AJAX technologies on my site to enable a 
richer application experience, I would still need to code for non-JavaScript 
useragents . I also think that with screenreaders, lots of AJAX tricks would be 
hard to parse, even if such a reader would have JavaScript. 

Do these things hold true, and are there other things that I need to take into 
account?

regards,

Maarten Stolte


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: Re: [WSG] AJAX and accesibility

2005-06-29 Thread Maarten Stolte
Hi,

thanks for the replies, I'm reading the three articles now, and they seem very 
useful.

regards,

Maarten

-Original Message-
From: James Denholm-Price [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 09:21:01 +0100
Subject: Re: [WSG] AJAX and accesibility

Check out Derek Featherstone's follow-up to his talk at @media for
some interesting viewpoints:
http://www.boxofchocolates.ca/archives/2005/06/12/javascript-and-accessibility#more-72

1. You probably always have to do the back end stuff anyway, even if
you can process lots of stuff that used to be back end on the client
using AJAX -- what if your most important visitor has JS disabled or
something (his firewall  mabe?) breaks AJAX?

2. Some screenreaders DO detect JS-driven changes to the DOM (e.g.
JAWS using IE) but I don't think it's definite what they see and what
they don't and as far as AJAX is concerned it's early days :-)

Just my 2p ... James

On 6/29/05, Maarten Stolte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I'm trying to find out if there are any resources on AJAX and accesibility.
 It seems to me that if I would employ AJAX technologies on my site to enable 
 a richer application experience, I would still need to code for 
 non-JavaScript useragents . I also think that with screenreaders, lots of 
 AJAX tricks would be hard to parse, even if such a reader would have 
 JavaScript.
 
 Do these things hold true, and are there other things that I need to take 
 into account?
 
 regards,
 
 Maarten Stolte
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**




**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Hi there!

2005-06-21 Thread Maarten Stolte




Hi,

also note that when using XHTML, say with help from Designing with
Webstandards from Jeffrey Zeldman, you can make a site that looks great
in newer browsers, and also works in older browsers...

Maarten

Erica Jean wrote:

  
  
  

  

Thanks to both of you for the links :) 

I really appreciate it ^^

---Original
Message---


From: Brian Cummiskey
Date:
06/21/05 15:31:52
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject:
Re: [WSG] Hi there!


Erica Jean wrote:


 Is there somewhere I could download older browsers
for testing by chance?


http://www.oldversion.com/program.php?n=msie
http://wp.netscape.com/download/archive/


**
The discussion list forhttp://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**