or this might work even better:
.third + div {
page-break-before: always;
}
--
Rene Saarsoo
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
e little information was gathered
about
the doctypes, but thanks for pointing this out, I'll hope to improve...
And thanks for the feedback.
--
Rene Saarsoo
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://w
previous investigations (done
four years ago by Marko Karppinen) when only 2% of the
sites were valid, now 17% is.
http://triin.net/2006/03/05/Validating_sites_of_W3C_members
Hope, this information brings smile on your faces :)
--
Rene Saarsoo
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 11:04:07 -, Joshua Street <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Not very comprehensible... The solution would be to use instead:
That's what we have stylesheets for. It's trivial to change the text
alignment of TH elements :-) TH strikes me as being semantically more
sound, par
eenreader
users, but it surely adds clarity to all the other users.
Hopefully it doesn't make me look like someone who is very into
table-based solutions :)
Rene Saarsoo
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://w
Vegetables > Carrot Add Edit Delete
Well.. at least what I think.
Rene Saarsoo
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
alid pages. The increase
is marked with green and decrease with red (brighter then green). All
the other figures in this page use the same colors in exactly the same
meaning.
Rene Saarsoo
**
The discussion list for http://webstandard
chanism
has failed. Except the hacks -- there are no good reasons to
simulate some odd behaivior of browser X in browser Y. And also
it's not that simple too.
Rene Saarsoo
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See ht
d is better to read then
“entity
references”, not to mention all the other benefits...)
-----
Rene Saarsoo
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on pos
Why not use a definition list:
Heading
item1
item2
item3
Using some Hx for list heading when there actually doesn't exist a level
for that heading doesn't make much sense... just pollutes the site with
strange headings imho.
Re
meaningful. The strange extensions may give maybe some
"security through obscurity", but in longer term you will curse them.
Rene Saarsoo
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guideli
Hi,
I think there are two main possibilities, both quite equal:
[1] Information on the same page
In that case you have link to the helping paragraph on the same page.
The onclick and other event handlers are added to the links with
javascript and also the help section (probably at the bottom of the
Hi,
I just really have to say: don't ask for PC users if you
really mean Windows users. I always check that kind of
posts just to find out they are talking about IE, which
does not run on my system (which still is PC).
And usually you are interested from software anyway -
doesn't really matter if I
I found a page, I tried to validate it (like I always do 8-) )
and suddenly there appeared an error message I had never seen before,
but more interesting then the error message was the code that
had caused it:
OK, they don't want to follow standards, that's okay with me, but
blaiming Dreamweaver
Hi,
Interestingly I saw the FOUC for about a minute before the style appeared,
and it was a good thing, because the site was fully usable, so I read it
through
before any styles were applied :) I have mostly encountered this with
cssZenGarden (when the stylesheet is fetched from some far-far-away
but trieng to come up with one by yourself.
I think the right way to define your own tags is to use XML - which is
ment for it. And then using some XSL Transformations or some other
server-side technology to transform your custom markup to correct XHTML.
semantical
meanings inside one .
There's one thing bothering me - for some strange reason Opera
renders by default in almost invisible color (anyone
knows why?)
Rene Saarsoo
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Se
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:02:25 +0930, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
.pmi p:first-line {
font-size: 1.2em;
}
this should be:
p.pmi:first-line {
font-size: 1.2em;
}
But using the 'br' isn't any good too. Maybe this line with
the br should be instead a heading followed with a paragraph?
Rene
What if at the first place you write in the document:
Which should be OK for any klient.
And, if the browser happens to support DOM correctly,
you remove it with Javascript and replace with:
Search
**
The discussion list for http://webstandards
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 10:40:49 +1100, Lindsay Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Your two example pages look identical to me.
Running Firefox 1.0 on Windows XP
No difference in my Linux version of Firefox 1.0 too...
**
The discussion list for http
20 matches
Mail list logo
