Hello Patrick,
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 21:55 +, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
> David Lane wrote:
> > Given the increased number of threats and the availability of slick
> > script blocker extensions for Firefox like NoScript
> > (http://noscript.net/) it's only going to get
gt;
> >
> > *******
> > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> > Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
> > *
king in web site compatibility anyway.
>
> Can someone please send them http://www.opera.com/wsc ?
>
> David
>
> On 18 Jan 2009, at 00:07, David Lane wrote:
>
> > Ouch - yes, I'm a bit embarrassed for the EducationalNetworks crowd -
> > their own website, presumably
t's from the Chicago Public
> >>> Schools, http://www.cps.k12.il.us/, with a company, Educational Networks,
> >>> http://www.educationalnetworks.net/, behind it.
> >>>
> >>> Is it too slick? I'm of two minds. It's great that it&#
Oops - should've been "Disclosure" rather than "Disclaimer" :)
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 15:21 +1300, David Lane wrote:
> Disclaimer: I've had occasional association with the work being done at
> Hagley, and have been a guest speaker to the computing students o
**
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
> ***
>
--
David Lane = Egressive Ltd = d...@e
s?
Cheers,
Dave
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 09:32 +1300, David Lane wrote:
> snip...
>
> Until Adobe does with Flash what it did with PDF and make it an open,
> unencumbered standard (making it possible to build a true market
> around
> the concept), I'll look for every opportun
l. It's amazing. It's like having sunshine flowing through
> your vains. So, do you blame HTML for every poorly coded website? Do
> you blame Flash for every bad use of Flash?
>
> Anyway, it seems like this entire argument would be better stated as
> "People who hate Flash because it doesn't behave in a manner identi
ack on a site they've built, but then require that
a) people compromise their freedom by signing an NDA to even view the
site, and then add insult to injury by
b) making the terms of the NDA available only in a non-standard,
proprietary MS Word DOC format.
Frankly, I'm amazed that
> Comments below.
>
> Alan C. Whiteman
> Visualis Web Design
> http://visualis.us
> (562) 305-2862
> ___
>
>
--
David Lane = Egressive Ltd = d...@egressive.com = m:+64 21 229 8147
p:+64 3 963 3733 = Linux: it just tastes better = nosoftwarepatents
http:
teacher that in their own time is actively involved in his
> > or her field will be more likely to teach his students about the
> > latest relevant and exciting bleeding edge technologies.
> >
> > On a side note, my personal opinion on web media courses focusing on
> > rich w
*
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
> ***
--
David Lane = Egressi
12 matches
Mail list logo
