Hi
Can you point me to a dashboard that is 508 compliant?
We like the user to be able to:
--move each individual dashboard within the webpage
--minimize and maximize each individual dashboard.
--choose which dashboards with the page the user would like.
Thanks,
Nancy Johnson
- Original
Late to the party, I know. Isn't that always the way?
* From: J Rodgers
Ontario (where I am) has the Ontarians with Disabilities Act (2001)
but it lacks any real teeth and doesn't suggest anything specifi
Provincial-government sites must be accessible; this is interpreted
as meaning
Have you looked at the other assistive technologies available?
Yes I work closely with our Office for Persons with Disabilities, even
presented at their Assistive Technology Fair last year. This year I will as
well and sounds like it will be even bigger than last year. There are some
very cool
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 5:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] 508??
Have you looked at the other assistive technologies available?
Yes I work closely with our Office for Persons with Disabilities, even
presented at their Assistive Technology Fair last year
Actually Canada has to accessibility requirements under any law. The
Canadian Government has the Common Look and Feel Guidelines and in there
they require WAI AA for all Federal Government sites (government workers in
Canada correct me please).
http://www.cio-dpi.gc.ca/clf-nsi/index_e.asp
That should probably read - 'does not have' - I am fine specimen of the new
and improved public education system in Canada ;) I apologize for the bad
grammar and typos and place the blame on my 5th grade teacher.
Jesse
On 6/30/04 9:19 AM, J Rodgers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually Canada has
,
Lee Roberts
http://www.applepiecart.com
http://www.roserockdesign.com
-Original Message-
From: J Rodgers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 7:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] 508??
Actually Canada has to accessibility requirements under any law
-
From: J Rodgers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 5:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] 508??
Have you looked at the other assistive technologies available?
Yes I work closely with our Office for Persons with Disabilities, even
presented at their Assistive
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 June 2004 15:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] 508??
Hi,
Lee would recommend a comprehensive accessibility text. I've scoured
Amazon to the point of red eye, and have found nothing but
how to pass
Bobby. This text should include captioning
Hi,
Thanks I wasn't aware my question had ominous tones. Nonetheless,
humble voice I appreciate your suggestion. /humble voice
On Wednesday, June 30, 2004, at 08:04 AM, Patrick Lauke wrote:
ominous voiceComprehensive Accessibility Text/ominous voice, as
the field is constantly evolving and
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] 508??
Hi,
Thanks I wasn't aware my question had ominous tones. Nonetheless, humble
voice I appreciate your suggestion. /humble voice On Wednesday, June 30,
2004, at 08:04 AM, Patrick Lauke wrote:
ominous voiceComprehensive Accessibility Text/ominous voice
YouSearched.com.
I hope this was of some help.
Sincerely,
Lee Roberts
http://www.roserockdesign.com
http://www.applepiecart.com
-Original Message-
From: ckimedia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 9:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] 508??
Hi,
Thanks
Would someone please explain why the WSG thinks Section 508 is what should
be used?
Thanks,
Lee Roberts
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to
Lee Roberts spoke the following wise words on 29/06/2004 11:43 PM EST:
Would someone please explain why the WSG thinks Section 508 is what should
be used?
Sure, if you explain what on earth you're talking about.
-- tim
*
The discussion list for
Sure, if you explain what on earth you're talking about.
-- tim
508 is this,
http://www.contentquality.com/mynewtester/cynthia.exe?rptmode=-1runcr=1url1=http://www.t94xr.net.nz/
Conformance to web accessability standards produced by the W3C.
Basically those ponts there tell you wats required for
Would someone please explain why the WSG thinks Section 508
is what should be used?
Don't know what you're talking about, but
http://www.google.com/search?q=section+508
gives:
http://www.section508.gov/
Might be what you're looking for.
--
Willemot Michaël
http://www.sotto.be
9:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] 508??
Tim knows that. What Tim was asking was: what on earth is the thread starter
asking when he says Would someone please explain why the WSG thinks Section
508 is what should be used?
I'd be interested in what on earth he's
Hi,
Are these expanded rules mentioned available to the public?
C
On Tuesday, June 29, 2004, at 09:49 AM, Lee Roberts wrote:
Even on the Oklahoma Electronic and Information Technology
Accessibility
Task Force, which I'm a member, we took Section 508 as our base rules
and
advanced beyond it.
Sure, if you explain what on earth you're talking about.
-- tim
508 is this,
http://www.contentquality.com/mynewtester/cynthia.exe?rptmode=-1runcr=1url1=http://www.t94xr.net.nz/
Conformance to web accessability standards produced by the W3C.
Basically those ponts there tell you wats required for
Perhaps one of the biggest problems with accessibility is the lack of
affordable assistive technologies (AT)? I think W3 complaint code mixed with
some decent features should be all that is required on the developers end.
The government would be better off spending more time and resources on
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] 508??
Sure, if you explain what on earth you're talking about.
-- tim
508 is this,
http://www.contentquality.com/mynewtester/cynthia.exe?rptmode=-1runcr=1url
1=http://www.t94xr.net.nz/
Conformance to web accessability standards produced by the W3C
29, 2004 3:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] 508??
Perhaps one of the biggest problems with accessibility is the lack of
affordable assistive technologies (AT)? I think W3 complaint code mixed with
some decent features should be all that is required on the developers end
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 12:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] 508??
Hi,
Are these expanded rules mentioned available to the public?
C
On Tuesday, June 29, 2004, at 09:49 AM, Lee Roberts wrote:
Even on the Oklahoma Electronic and Information Technology
Accessibility Task
/standards/iwasStandards.cfm
I hope this helps.
Sincerely,
Lee Roberts
-Original Message-
From: ckimedia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 12:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] 508??
Hi,
Are these expanded rules mentioned available to the public?
C
On Tuesday, June 29
~
508 Awareness Web Site
http://www.section508.gov/508Awareness/
The entire site can be downloaded as a pdf. Useful, and informative.
~
Kicking around for a while. New to me. Useful and informative.
Weaving a Secure Web around Education:
A Guide to Technology Standards and
25 matches
Mail list logo