gt;
> -Original Message-
>
> On Behalf Of Chad Kelly
> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 12:40 PM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org <mailto:wsg@webstandardsgroup.org>
> Subject: Re: [WSG] Accessibility Testing
>
> Hi
> Your best bet would be to look at the tools prov
s for passing it along
> > it's
> > a great resource...
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Doug Burt
> >
> > -Original Message-----
> >
> > On Behalf Of Chad Kelly
> > Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 12:40 PM
> > To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> >
> a great resource...
>
> Cheers,
> Doug Burt
>
> -Original Message-
>
> On Behalf Of Chad Kelly
> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 12:40 PM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: Re: [WSG] Accessibility Testing
>
> Hi
> Your best bet would be to look
Hi,
It's worth looking at what W3C has to say - see
http://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/Overview.html - but it depends what your goals are.
Do you want to pick up as many code-level issues as possible or undertake a
conformance check in accordance with the WCAG 2.0 standard?
Cheers, Andrew
Andrew Boyd
ginal Message-
On Behalf Of Chad Kelly
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 12:40 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Accessibility Testing
Hi
Your best bet would be to look at the tools provided by Vision Australia
visionaustralia.org under accessible solutions.
They have a free toolbar yo
2011 1:04 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Accessibility Testing
We are currently negotiating with one of the major automated
accessibility tool vendors to resell their tool in the UK. We cannot
sell into the US so I have forwarded your message and they should
contact you.
1 17:16
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Accessibility Testing
Hi WSG Friends!
The company I work for is considering dropping WatchFire for testing
because of the price. I'm really concerned about not being able to test
code against specific accessibility guidelines like WCAG 1.0 or 2.0. D
.
Regards,
Spell
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of Chad Kelly
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 12:40 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Accessibility Testing
Hi
Your best bet would be to look at the tools
Hi
Your best bet would be to look at the tools provided by Vision Australia
visionaustralia.org under accessible solutions.
They have a free toolbar you can download.
I am also looking at providing web accessibility testing services as a
part of the services offered by CPK Web Services. Would a
Hi WSG Friends!
The company I work for is considering dropping WatchFire for testing
because of the price. I'm really concerned about not being able to test
code against specific accessibility guidelines like WCAG 1.0 or 2.0. Do
any of you know of any cheaper (or free) applications that do just as
p.org<mailto:wsg@webstandardsgroup.org>"
mailto:wsg@webstandardsgroup.org>>
Subject: RE: [WSG] Accessibility Testing
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org<mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org>
[mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Lesley Lutomski
Sent: 22 Octobe
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Lesley Lutomski
Sent: 22 October 2010 14:49
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Accessibility Testing
On 20/10/10 21:13, Nick Stone wrote:
> Does anyone have suggestions
On 20/10/10 21:13, Nick Stone wrote:
> Does anyone have suggestions on how to obtain website usability feedback
> from various members of the disabled community?
Kevin Ireson replied with some helpful comments, but I think Nick's main
point was that there is no substitute for testing by real p
February 2009 12:03
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Accessibility testing
http://faetest.dres.uiuc.edu
I'm totally shocked, that tool is actually quite good.
If I get time later I'll run it through a few problematic sites and
compare against manual reviewed reports.
Mi
**VACATION NOTICE ***
Hi,
This is an automatic message just to let you know that your e-mail has been
forwarded to me but I am on vacation, I'll get back to you as soon as possible
and at the very latest the 03 March 2009.
For any urgent matters you can cal
**VACATION NOTICE ***
Hi,
This is an automatic message just to let you know that your e-mail has been
forwarded to me but I am on vacation, I'll get back to you as soon as possible
and at the very latest the 03 March 2009.
For any urgent matters you can cal
**VACATION NOTICE ***
Hi,
This is an automatic message just to let you know that your e-mail has been
forwarded to me but I am on vacation, I'll get back to you as soon as possible
and at the very latest the 03 March 2009.
For any urgent matters you can cal
David Dorward wrote:
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
2: according to specs (and browsers) a character encoding stated in
an xml declaration is good, and further stating unnecessary. No
warning should be given in such a case.
An declaration (or anything else before the Doctype) will
trigger Quirks mo
**VACATION NOTICE ***
Hi,
This is an automatic message just to let you know that your e-mail has been
forwarded to me but I am on vacation, I'll get back to you as soon as possible
and at the very latest the 03 March 2009.
For any urgent matters you can cal
**VACATION NOTICE ***
Hi,
This is an automatic message just to let you know that your e-mail has been
forwarded to me but I am on vacation, I'll get back to you as soon as possible
and at the very latest the 03 March 2009.
For any urgent matters you can cal
**VACATION NOTICE ***
Hi,
This is an automatic message just to let you know that your e-mail has been
forwarded to me but I am on vacation, I'll get back to you as soon as possible
and at the very latest the 03 March 2009.
For any urgent matters you can cal
**VACATION NOTICE ***
Hi,
This is an automatic message just to let you know that your e-mail has been
forwarded to me but I am on vacation, I'll get back to you as soon as possible
and at the very latest the 03 March 2009.
For any urgent matters you can cal
**VACATION NOTICE ***
Hi,
This is an automatic message just to let you know that your e-mail has been
forwarded to me but I am on vacation, I'll get back to you as soon as possible
and at the very latest the 03 March 2009.
For any urgent matters you can cal
**VACATION NOTICE ***
Hi,
This is an automatic message just to let you know that your e-mail has been
forwarded to me but I am on vacation, I'll get back to you as soon as possible
and at the very latest the 03 March 2009.
For any urgent matters you can cal
**VACATION NOTICE ***
Hi,
This is an automatic message just to let you know that your e-mail has been
forwarded to me but I am on vacation, I'll get back to you as soon as possible
and at the very latest the 03 March 2009.
For any urgent matters you can cal
What similar software / online systems do people use [for web accessibility
testing]...
For an extensive list of Web accessibility evaluation software and online systems
("tools"), see:
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/Overview.html
It's a searchable database of over 100 tools.
And I'll
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
> 2: according to specs (and browsers) a character encoding stated in an
> xml declaration is good, and further stating unnecessary.
> No warning should be given in such a case.
An declaration (or anything else before the Doctype) will
trigger Quirks mode in IE6 so should be
Jon Gunderson wrote:
http://faetest.dres.uiuc.edu
Please let me know what you think of it.
First impression: good.
Informative page reports.
A few points...
1: i and b can in many cases not be replaced by h1..h6 or em and strong.
Both i and b are valid - span-like (no implied semantics) - e
sgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of Jon Gunderson
Sent: 16 February 2009 17:25
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Accessibility testing
You can try the Illinois Functional Web Accessibility Evaluator
service. It is a free service, no cost to create an acco
That is a very cool tool. Nice job.
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Jon Gunderson
Sent: Tuesday, 17 February 2009 4:25 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Accessibility testing
You can try the
That is a very cool tool. Nice job.
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Jon Gunderson
Sent: Tuesday, 17 February 2009 4:25 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Accessibility testing
You can try the
That is a very cool tool. Nice job.
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Jon Gunderson
Sent: Tuesday, 17 February 2009 4:25 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Accessibility testing
You can try the
That is a very cool tool. Nice job.
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Jon Gunderson
Sent: Tuesday, 17 February 2009 4:25 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Accessibility testing
You can try the
That is a very cool tool. Nice job.
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Jon Gunderson
Sent: Tuesday, 17 February 2009 4:25 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Accessibility testing
You can try the
On Firefox (fx) with web developer extension, add ATRC web
accessibility checker (testing; sometimes temporary down) against WCAG
2.0, WCAG 1.0, BITV, Stanca Act, Section 508.
Open the tools menu of its extension:
Edit tools
Add
choose (tool type) URL
add: http://checker.atrc.utoronto.ca/servlet/C
You can try the Illinois Functional Web Accessibility Evaluator
service. It is a free service, no cost to create an account.
http://faetest.dres.uiuc.edu
This is the Candidate release 1, that hopefully be our production
version available later this week.
Please let me know what you think of it.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Stuart Foulstone
wrote:
> Also take account of results in published surveys of actual users.
>
> For example, see screen-reader user survey:
>
> http://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey/
>
>
>
> On Sat, February 14, 2009 11:35 pm, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
You can also try Vision Australia's Toolbar
http://www.visionaustralia.org.au/info.aspx?page=1985
They have quite a few tools (that work with IE - I also have the firefox one
as well).
I never rely on one completely on a single tool and check using multiple as
they all give slightly different res
Also take account of results in published surveys of actual users.
For example, see screen-reader user survey:
http://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey/
On Sat, February 14, 2009 11:35 pm, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
> On 11/2/09 05:59, Henrik Madsen wrote:
>> What similar software / onl
On 11/2/09 05:59, Henrik Madsen wrote:
What similar software / online systems do people use and get reliable
results (if reliable results are indeed attainable)?
Define "reliable results". :)
Such systems are intrinsically limited in what they can test.
If your contract requires you to pass c
The Firefox Web Developer Toolbar (by Chris Pederick:
http://chrispederick.com/work/web-developer/) has an option under "Tools"
to validate Section 508. In the end, it ultimately just point to this
site:
http://www.cynthiasays.com/fulloptions.asp
There is an optional select menu to change from Sec
Hi Henrik Madsen,
I also work with Mac, if needed use sofwares 'windows only'I usually
use the VirtualBox, this software is Opensource.
This software has an incredible performance to emulate other operating
systems inside the windows, and more! is opensource (:
See this link:
http://www.v
> Now, here's the thing. This software is only for PC. I'm Mac. Not very
> accessible eh? :)
>
It appears to be based on eclipse ... (probably java based like other
eclipse-based stuff)
Might it be possible to build it from source on Mac or Linux?
Has anyone here tried this?
I never really
http://www.vmware.com/download/fusion/
http://www.soft32.com/Download/Free/Apple_Boot_Camp/4-200398-1.html
Problem solved? Otherwise,
Firefox has plugins that give nice reports, (HTML Validator plugin may have
had the Accessibility options, i can't remember, it's been a while since i
used it)
A
Henrik Madsen wrote:
Now, here's the thing. This software is only for PC. I'm Mac. Not very
accessible eh? :)
What similar software / online systems do people use and get reliable
results (if reliable results are indeed attainable)?
I use VirtualBox (www.virtualBox.org) to run virtual Win
Parallels
Henrik Madsen wrote:
Hi all,
I'm wrapping up a Government agency website.
They have reams of design and usability standards. Some pretty
pointless; others very valid - but no problem.
Re. accessibility, they use ACTF aDesigner.
http://www.eclipse.org/actf/downloads/tools/aDesign
Hi all,
I'm wrapping up a Government agency website.
They have reams of design and usability standards. Some pretty
pointless; others very valid - but no problem.
Re. accessibility, they use ACTF aDesigner.
http://www.eclipse.org/actf/downloads/tools/aDesigner/index.php
And "our scores ag
47 matches
Mail list logo
