Marvin,
I see you fixed the paragraph before the body tag.
I'm re-validating your page and will send back some more tips.
Joseph R. B. Taylor
/Web Designer / Developer/
--
Sites by Joe, LLC
/Clean, Simple and Elegant Web Design/
Phone: (609) 335-3076
Web:
Marvin,
As I send over items I notice - for now forget about HTML 4.01 or HTML 5
and stay with XHTML for the moment.
Things to fix then get back to me:
Inside the div tag with the id of banner_new you have double break
tags surrounding both the first level heading and the image. I see the
as interesting as it is... how about you guys communicate off list.
On 22/01/2010 12:09 PM, Joseph Taylor wrote:
Marvin,
As I send over items I notice - for now forget about HTML 4.01 or HTML
5 and stay with XHTML for the moment.
Things to fix then get back to me:
Inside the div tag with
Hi Marvin,
I have highlighted the code below .. please avoid using br/ tags for the
line breaks please use some margin / padding to achieve the same in CSS
Avoid using the inline style with the markup tags itself..
Rest all looks fine buddy :) :)
Please download this validator to your FF
Hi.
looking to fix my site.
have not got around to it yet.
doing other projects and now iwll get to it tomorrow.
now how do i make all the images the same size.
Do i get rid of the banana images and the second menu.
only one set of links.
On the credits page, do i get rid of the p link from the
my site still errorshi.
take a look at http://startrekcafe.alacorncomputer.com
still errors.
and okay will go and download the vision australia color tester and see what
colors they say for the background.
okay will go and vallidate the hoem page.
did fix the table reading problem.
it was the
...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] En
nombre de Marvin Hunkin
Enviado el: miércoles, 07 de octubre de 2009 14:06
Para: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Asunto: [WSG] My Site
my site still errorshi.
take a look at http://startrekcafe.alacorncomputer.com
still errors.
and okay will go and download
That's great to learn more, Marvin. Good luck you then. And cheers too :)
2009/9/23 Marvin Hunkin startrekc...@gmail.com
hi.
well.
did this for a course a couple of years ago.
and got legal use to use all the images.
so want to put this up on a site.
as a port folio of my student web
hi.
well not going to change the site a whole great deal.
proud of this site i created for my course.
and only changing the mouse rollovers.
so if it looks great.
let me know.
it is at:
http://startrekcafe.alacorncomputer.com
cheers Marvin.
ps: might be a few hours before my friend uploads it.
as
Hi Marvin,
I am interested in your angle on regarding the repeating alt attribute
values in your menu, e.g. alt=Closed Banana.
This would appear to be against basic WCAGC accessibility guidelines, and
also totally unnecessary verbiage for the listener.
What is your reasoning for doing this?
Hi Marvin,
To follow on from what Dave Hurley said about colours, I find the green
Link text hard to read on the green background. No matter how great
your site is, if your users can't read it, it's not doing its job.
Visionaustralia have a really useful tool on their Web site here:
Hi Marvin,
To follow on from what Dave Hurley said about colours, I find the green
Link text hard to read on the green background. No matter how great
your site is, if your users can't read it, it's not doing its job.
Visionaustralia have a really useful tool on their Web site here:
Return Receipt
Your Re: [WSG] my site
document
hi.
did vallidate all the pages and fixed all the errors.
so what do you mean by excess tags.
that is the way i set it up and want it that way.
what do you mean by images not loading.
cheers Marvin.
***
List Guidelines:
Hi,
At the homepage source you have a /div too much on line 59.
Also, the mango image is not loading. It seems that the file is corrupt:
when trying to reach I get a message saying that the image has errors.
I think all the tables are loading correctly, both at the homepage and
produce. I
Return Receipt
Your Re: [WSG] my site
document
I'm very, very sorry for the receipt request! It was a long time since I
last participated in this list. I've already altered my settings.
Roberto
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
Return Receipt
Your Re: [WSG] my site
document
dlapcew...@fs.fed.us
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] my site
Return Receipt
Your Re: [WSG] my site
document:
wasdlapcew...@fs.fed.us
received
by:
at:09/15/2009 08:15:24
Return Receipt
Your Re: [WSG] my site
document
Return Receipt
Your Re: [WSG] my site
document
HI.
if you visit http://tracs.co.nz/marvin
and a sighted friend, helping me out.
but he says that i have a image with a layover background.
can any one take a look and help me out?
how to do this in css, as a blind web developer, and cannot edit graphics
using a screen reader like jaws for
Well,
You can start reading
http://thetaoofwebdesign.weblog.com.pt/arquivo/2004/10/
color_schemes_g.html and
http://thetaoofwebdesign.weblog.com.pt/arquivo/2004/08/
update_how_to_c.html to help you out with the colors.
Then pick a pencil and start drawing... them put that in CSS / XHTML
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Anthony Timberlake
Sent: Wednesday, 22 December 2004 12:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] My Site
I think that I have done a nice job with the new stylesheets.
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 01:58:20 +0100, JohnyB [EMAIL
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] My Site
Well, it's getting there the html now validates but the css still does not.
It has the same errors as before only now they are on all three stylesheets.
You cannot list sizes or dimensions without the unit in other words padding:
2; is not valid
Anthony,
Do not get discouraged. Designing semantically correct, accessible,
and valid sites is not easy. Transitioning to standards compliant
design is a long frustrating road, but it is well worth the pain.
There are many that can forget the journey that we all traveled to get
where we are
The url given has a valid html4 button, but the doctype of the page itself
is xhtml 1.0 transitional. The markup is nothing like xhtml, but the
validator keeps trying to validate it as xhtml because the doctype says
so. If you cant change your markup to xhtml, it would be easier to change
My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc. What can I do to improve my
site? Is there anything wrong with it? Thanks for your help.
--
Anthony Timberlake
Owner - StaticHost Internet Services
http://www.statichost.co.uk
**
The discussion list for
The color scheme is what I do not like. Can someone help me find a
better color scheme?
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 09:46:27 -0500, Anthony Timberlake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc. What can I do to improve my
site? Is there anything wrong with it? Thanks for your
Try http://colorschemer.com/
Great tool, I think there's a 15 day trial.
Regards,
Hanni
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:00:00 -0500, Anthony Timberlake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The color scheme is what I do not like. Can someone help me find a
better color scheme?
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 09:46:27
My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc. What can I do to improve my
site? Is there anything wrong with it? Thanks for your help.
--
Anthony Timberlake
Owner - StaticHost Internet Services
http://www.statichost.co.uk
hmmm... eg. you can validate it, esp. change the to / (XHTML)
G'day
My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc. What can I do to improve my
site? Is there anything wrong with it? Thanks for your help.
Validate, fix, validate, fix, validate, ...
You might start by changing the Doctype to HTML 4.01 Transitional and
fix the 19 errors (as opposed to 154 with
http://www.paletteman.com/
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
mlinc.com
On Dec 21, 2004, at 10:34 AM, Hanni Ross wrote:
Try http://colorschemer.com/
Great tool, I think there's a 15 day trial.
Regards,
Hanni
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:00:00 -0500, Anthony Timberlake
Anthony Timberlake wrote:
My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc. What can I do to improve my
site? Is there anything wrong with it?
I don't mean to be rude but a token attempt at validation is probably in
order before asking for suggestions.
You may want to start by limiting yourself to one
I do have one set of head, body and html tags.
I have validated my CSS and HTML.
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:51:36 -0500, Al Sessions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anthony Timberlake wrote:
My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc. What can I do to improve my
site? Is there anything wrong with it?
have validated my CSS and HTML.
This generally means you have fixed the errors the validator displays.
The page you linked to still has 130+ errors.
Johannes' suggestion
hmmm... eg. you can validate it, esp. change the to / (XHTML)
would fix quite a few.
Matt Hampel
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004
I went back and re-checked for CSS and HTML validation: You still have
some problems to fix. The CSS validator shows an error page. The HTML
validator clearly states your code is not valid XHTML 1.0 Strict, with
136 errors. You'll have to fix those first.
It looks to me like you'll have to
On 22 Dec 2004, at 8:10 AM, Anthony Timberlake wrote:
I do have one set of head, body and html tags.
I have validated my CSS and HTML.
Don't see how your HTML can validate. Adding a DOCTYPE of XHTML Strict
will not magically convert an HTML document to XHTML. The syntax of
your code is entirely
I am not new at this, just haven't done it for a while now. I thought
by being on this list, I could get the help I needed. I appologize if
I offended you.
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 08:53:26 +1100, Nick Gleitzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22 Dec 2004, at 8:10 AM, Anthony Timberlake wrote:
I
]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] My Site
I do have one set of head, body and html tags.
I have validated my CSS and HTML.
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:51:36 -0500, Al Sessions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Anthony Timberlake wrote:
My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc. What can I
with each
refresh so you must be working on it ... good for you ! ... :o)
HTH's ...
B.
William Haggerty
VWH Web Services
http://vwh.ca
- Original Message -
From: Anthony Timberlake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] My
On 22 Dec 2004, at 9:04 AM, Anthony Timberlake wrote:
I am not new at this, just haven't done it for a while now. I thought
by being on this list, I could get the help I needed. I appologize if
I offended you.
I'm not in the least offended. But if you'd like help from this list
(and this advice
CTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 2:47
PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] My Site
It is now validated with HTML and CSS. Does anyone have
anything else that I can do to improve my site? Sites to read and
gain more knowledge, scripts? On Tue, 21 Dec 2004
14:32:14 -0800, haggis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
Anthony Timberlake wrote:
My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc. What can I do to improve my
site? Is there anything wrong with it? Thanks for your help.
To me, the #3 stylesheet provides the least bothersome color
combination, but that produces a section of virtually invisible text at
the
Try http://colorschemer.com/
Have a look at http://wellstyled.com/tools/colorscheme2/index-en.html
--
Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz | janbrasna.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
I think that I have done a nice job with the new stylesheets.
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 01:58:20 +0100, JohnyB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try http://colorschemer.com/
Have a look at http://wellstyled.com/tools/colorscheme2/index-en.html
--
Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz |
I think that I have done a nice job with the new stylesheets.
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 01:58:20 +0100, JohnyB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try http://colorschemer.com/
Have a look at http://wellstyled.com/tools/colorscheme2/index-en.html
--
Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz |
dude that site bites !
Anthony Timberlake wrote:
I think that I have done a nice job with the new stylesheets.
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 01:58:20 +0100, JohnyB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try http://colorschemer.com/
Have a look at http://wellstyled.com/tools/colorscheme2/index-en.html
--
Jan
Excuse me?
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:19:31 +1000, simon dodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dude that site bites !
--
Anthony Timberlake
DJ on Dot Radio
http://www.dotradio.uni.cc
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] My Site
I think that I have done a nice job with the new stylesheets.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] My Site
I think that I have done a nice job with the new stylesheets.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
Anthony - you are validating the individual css files. Your inline
styles still leave a bit to be desired...
When you validate css using a site url it takes the css that page
accesses and runs . You are validating each file in isolation from
inline styles.
For example:
div
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:40:50 -0500, Anthony Timberlake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, see correction below--- sans-serif *not* serif
How are you getting errors?
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dotradio.uni.cc%2Fstyles%2F1.cssusermedium=all
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] My Site
How are you getting errors?
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dotradio.uni.cc%2Fstyles%2F1.cssusermedium=all
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F
Alan Trick wrote:
Hi,
I finished a nice update for my website, added a browser detection
script on my css because IE doensn't like web standards.
Now my site works in all the browsers I have exept for Opera, and I
don't know why, can anyone help me with this?
the url is
José López wrote:
Hi Alan, the problem is simple, you no use the tag class else id
1) I don't think this would do anything different and
2) id's are meant to be unique and I don't want to have a whole bunch of
id's all with the same css info, that's bad code and redundant.
I think I'll go
G'day
Incidentally, when I went to the site in MSIE, it asked me what program
I
wanted to open the page with, rather than displaying it. Probably
related
to your Content-Type: application/xhtml+xml
Really? What version of MSIE do you have? I've loaded it many times in
mine (6) and I've
://www.googlism.com/;googlism.com/a.
/p
Peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Trick
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 4:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] My site is broken in Opera
Hi,
I finished a nice update for my website, added
Will do Mike. Thanks for the constructive criticism. I'll delete the
full screen.
Good suggestion.
Shane Helm
On Oct 16, 2004, at 6:43 PM, Michael Allan wrote:
On Saturday, October 16, 2004, at 03:13 PM, Shane Helm wrote:
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
If others have solved
That worked! Sweet!
My last problem seems also to be only in IE on the PC. Between the top
button that says SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER and the 12px tan border
of the header bar there is a green space where those 2 graphics aren't
lining up. Got any reason why this is a problem?
Hi Shane,
It's and IE problem. Looks great on Firefox.
(I don't have linux :( Firefox 0.10.1)
--
Gmail invites - just ask nicely
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 15:45:50 +1000, Joshua Street
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Be nice to PC's. I've got a PC, and all that looks fine to me.
Mind you, I'm
On 16 Oct 2004, at 3:13 PM, Shane Helm wrote:
I'm not sure where I've gone wrong, but I must get a PC to check from
now on. Must go shopping. Oh no, will I actually own a PC.
Dreadful... Just teasing you PC folks. :)
I'm with you, Shane - I'd never use anything but a Mac as my main
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Joseph Lindsay
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Hi Shane,
It's and IE problem. Looks great on Firefox.
(I don't have linux :( Firefox 0.10.1)
Also very nice in Opera 7.51 -- definitely down to MSIE...
--
Chris Hughes
Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have
On Saturday, October 16, 2004, at 03:13 PM, Shane Helm wrote:
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
If others have solved your float problem Shane, can I suggest that you
don't insist that the window resize itself to full-screen? I'm lucky
enough to have a large screen (20 Apple Cinema
I was having a great week in my Mac world of coding my newest client's
website in CSS XHTML. All was well in my happy little MacLife. The
site was working just fine in Mac Safari, Firefox, Netscape, IE
5.2.3. Then I got curious as to what was going on in the PC world. So
I went to a
65 matches
Mail list logo
