> What kind of mobile phone does the average person use?
<…>
> As for that figure, I'm not sure that includes browsers that don't
> actually support javascript at all!
<…>
The right question to ask would be "what kind of mobile phone does the
average person
use to browse the web?". My point is, th
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 13:07 +, James Leslie wrote:
> Another point to note is that many mobile phones have JavaScript enabled
> so this figure may increase with the expected rise in mobile popularity.
>
> *** Sorry - that should have said disabled not enabled **
not just many ... actually I w
Was about to say! Very true, but the iPhone is proving a popular
combination, especially with unlimited data on contract, and JS is
turned on by default. There is an option to turn it off, but I doubt
many would do so.
PS I'm using an iPhone all the time now, typing this message one one!
> Another point to note is that many mobile phones have JavaScript enabled
> so this figure may increase with the expected rise in mobile popularity.
> *** Sorry - that should have said disabled not enabled **
I actually see mobile browsing rising in popularity when browsers on gadgets
are full ca
Another point to note is that many mobile phones have JavaScript enabled
so this figure may increase with the expected rise in mobile popularity.
*** Sorry - that should have said disabled not enabled **
***
List Guidelines: ht
I recently got my hands on some statistics for a major UK bank who found
that 2.7% of their customers have JavaScript disabled. I think this may
be a slightly more realistic figure than the techy W3C site.
Another point to note is that many mobile phones have JavaScript enabled
so this figure may
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Rimantas Liubertas wrote:
> Exactly, only this can mean the opposite of what you state:
> more tech savy users know how to turn Javascript off, unlike
> the general public.
>
One other thing to bear in mind is that we are mostly thinking of users as
being sat at
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Dave Hall wrote:
> I would suggest that w3schools attracts a "more switched on user" than
> say Live Search, YouTube or myspace/facebook/insert social network here.
> Stats from those types of sites are what I would be more interested in
> seeing.
Good luck to th
> IMO stats from tech sites are not very representative of the
> general intarwebs user base.
Exactly, only this can mean the opposite of what you state:
more tech savy users know how to turn Javascript off, unlike
the general public.
Regards,
Rimantas
--
http://rimantas.com/
*
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 23:48 -0500, Rick Faircloth wrote:
> According to statistics supplied by w3schools.com, as of Jan 08
> approximately 95% of users had JS enabled.
>
> Check out http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
> and look towards the middle of the page for the stats.
Just
Paul Hudson wrote:
Doesn't ie6's highest security setting turn js off?
Yes, and all that goes with it - like IE-expressions.
I haven't looked at ie7 but would assume similar.
IE7 same as IE6.
From the look of it - brief testing - IE8b2 also turns off
script-support in high security mode.
According to statistics supplied by w3schools.com, as of Jan 08
approximately 95% of users had JS enabled.
Check out http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
and look towards the middle of the page for the stats.
Rick
> -Original Message-
> From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [
Doesn't ie6's highest security setting turn js off? I haven't looked at ie7 but
would assume similar.
Regards
Paul
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Simon Pascal Klein
Sent: Tuesday, 27 January 2009 2:59 PM
To: Jessic
13 matches
Mail list logo
