Hi Lucian.
Your tabs are nestled (almost) one on top of the other, vertically in Opera 7.
This problem appeared before on this forum and should find the answer on a recent post
by Hugh Todd.
Good luck, JG
--- Lucian Teo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been very impressed with the camaraderie
BTW, I should have mentioned, the uppermost tab showing fully is the 'Contact' tab.
If you need a .gif of what I mean, please let me know?
Regards, JG
--- Lucian Teo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been very impressed with the camaraderie exhibited on this list,
even for OT posts.
I just
Wow - the Grammies of web design. One day these awards might pay
attention to what is actually going on in the web medium not treat sites
as high bandwidth, interactive TV ads.
There are a couple of good ones in there, a couple of your usual flash
eye-candy sites and a whole bunch of
If so what can be done about it? I'm really interested in some ideas.
With all the professionals on this list, surely there must be some people
who are willing to devote time to setting up a *real* awards program?
Hell, I know I'd be willing to help, I know I'm no CSS guru (yet), but I
sure
If you remember Cameron (bloo man) posting something recently about
starting a standards awards, or even if you dont:
http://www.webstandardsawards.com/
-Ben
http://www.mxdu.com/
Mark Stanton wrote:
Ok that was my initial reaction on seeing the awards site - I didn't send
the email at 4pm
Well done to Johan, Cameron and Andy for getting it up and running!
Andy has written more here:
http://www.andybudd.com/blog/archives/000154.html
Russ
If you remember Cameron (bloo man) posting something recently about
starting a standards awards, or even if you dont:
If so what can be done about it? I'm really interested in
some ideas.
WSG Awards? :)
I've really got my doubts about whether a WSG awards would be a solution to
this particular problem - lack of acknowledgement of web standards in
mainstream awards. I'm not saying WSG awards is a bad idea
Lindsay Evans wrote:
WSG Awards? :)
Sheesh, didn't notice that TB was still downloading a bunch of emails
before I replied :|
The Web Standards Awards looks pretty interesting, gives me more
incentive to get my redesign finished :)
--
Lindsay Evans
Mark wrote:
creating an additional award is not going to make the main award events
stand up and go duh, we've been coming at this from the wrong angle.
I also feel that hall of shame type stuff is not a great solution either -
I'm seriously wondering what the right approach would be - I really
Mark,
Yes, I am as disappointed as you are about this. I received the email from
AIMIA and felt exactly the same. What's more, it would cost my company $500
a year to join AIMIA. I found that out after having to give them my private
details first, then I was told what the prices were to join.
Stick with it David. Our time will come. The benefits of going through the
(hard) process of getting your standards codebank together far outweigh the
pain. Once you have it, you start with a base codeset and then, creating a
new site is a much easier process. Whether you pass the savings on to
Hey Chris,
Not sure if you've been able to get it working yet... But on the FireFox
installation notes, it says that you should turn off Extensions (if you
had any) before installing the new version:
http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/releases/#install
Hope that helps.
Frank wrote:
Hey Chris,
Not sure if you've been able to get it working yet... But on the FireFox
installation notes, it says that you should turn off Extensions (if you
had any) before installing the new version:
http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/releases/#install
Hope that helps.
On 10 Feb 2004, at 11:03, russ weakley wrote:
Well done to Johan, Cameron and Andy for getting it up and running!
Andy has written more here:
http://www.andybudd.com/blog/archives/000154.html
No Worries.
Johan deserves most of the credit. All I did was do the MT instillation.
Andy Budd
-grammar-20040210/
Regards
Chris Blown
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*
I have an interesting problem here...
i try and validate the CSS of my XHTML website...
and the CSS page says i must validate my XHTML first...
The problem is that the XHTML is actually 100% Valid.
It has a problem with the '' symbol??
What is causing this problem?
I mean - why doesn't the
Hi Chris,
You need to escape any with
amp;(even in URL query strings). Links to the relevant
files/validator results would help so we could see the code.
P
From: Chris Stratford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004
1:01 PMTo: Web Standards
The other suggestion is to validate the CSS file(s)
separately at http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator-uri.htmlrather
than parsing the xhtml for the linked files.
P
I have an
interesting problem here...i try and validate the CSS of my XHTML
website...and the CSS page says i
Okay here is where the site is in Dev:
www.desertstandard.net/yv/
The problem is that in WIN IE6 i get the background image, the upper right hand image
and the nav bar to appear, but nothing else shows up! I check the source and
everything is there, its just not showing up.
In Safari 1.0 I
It's good practice to do it for (amp;) and (quot;) in the text all the
time (HTML or XHTML).
Also be aware of em-dashes, en-dashes, epsilons (...) and the curly
varieties of and ' (which I hate and always strip back to the plain text
version).
If it's your own blog software, make sure to
not wanting to add to your OT, but you will find that #htmlEditFormat(string)# works
better for most cases ;-))
Taco Fleur
07 3535 5072
Blog: http://www.tacofleur.com/index/blog/
Methodology: http://www.tacofleur.com/index/methodology/
Tell me and I will forget
Show me and I will remember
Teach
Peter Firminger wrote:
Sorry, I don't do PHP. Someone else may have a PHP solution for you.
P
I think I did a pretty long post a while back on this subject -
probably good to search for it in the archive.
Anyway, the PHP way to do the CF in Peter's example is:
$newString =
I beg of you, don't discard the 'curly varieties' - they are the typographical correct apostrophes. The non-curly versions are an ugly pox on mankind and should only be used to delineate feet and inches.
Peter
On 11/02/2004, at 2:30 PM, Peter Firminger wrote:
Also be aware of em-dashes,
Thats great thanks!
:)
There are a whole bunch of PHP tags available to use...
Thanks for that tho :)
Your advice has helped me a lot :D
cheers Pete!
Chris Stratford
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Http://www.neester.com
Peter Firminger wrote:
It's good practice to do it for (amp;) and " (quot;)
Taco
You probably want to wrap the input withing the label, although it's
not required:
"
The LABEL element associates a label with a form control. By
associating labels with form controls, authors give important hints to
users of speech browsers while also allowing visual browsers to
On Wednesday, February 11, 2004, at 02:30 PM, Peter Firminger wrote:
Also be aware of em-dashes, en-dashes, epsilons (...) and the curly
varieties of and ' (which I hate and always strip back to the plain
text
version).
I've found that the entities mdash; and ndash; don't work in older
Aahh. good stuff. I misread my own quote from WDG. :-!
"the FOR attribute must match the value of the associated form
control's ID attribute"
Now I wonder what happens with xhtml where the name attribute is not
allowed. I suppose doing id="car[0]", id="car[1]" etc etc may work...
then add
I've found that the entities mdash; and ndash; don't work in older
browsers (like NN4), so best use the numeric entities:
em-dash = #8212;
en-dash = #8211;
I agree entirely Justin. Sorry I didn't point that out.
elispes (not epsilons) = #8230;
Oops,
Naw, I can live with the three dot thing ;)
P
But I'd rather stick with 3 dots (...) as I have seen this one break badly
in a search result or text browser or something, can't remember where now.
May just be a stubborn bad habit. Sorry if that worries Peter (UH) as well.
x-tad-bigger
Roger,
I am getting a 404 page not found with that URL.
Regards
PAUL ROSS
SkyRocket Design Co
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Here is the site:
www.desertstandard.net/YV/
-
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
ooops sorry,
www.desertstandard.net/yv/
Original Message
Subject: Re: [WSG] horizontal nav bar nightmare
From: Paul Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, February 10, 2004 10:50 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Roger,
I am getting a 404 page not found with that URL.
Regards
Hey, this is sort of an OT post, but affects my CSS development, so...
I'm testing my pages as I go along (coding in BBEdit). But I'm finding
that in a sequential series of DIVs, or dls, I'm getting a sort of
cumulative weight gain in my fonts, whether they're normal or bold
weight.
Doesn't
32 matches
Mail list logo
