Hi all,
I know a lot of people use this:
* {
margin:0;
padding:0;
}
To help reduce code and eliminate lots of those strange default margins
issues.
Don't think this has been mentioned anywhere yet, but one issue I found with
this, was that within dropdowns the downarrow GUI,
I know a lot of people use this:
* {
margin:0;
padding:0;
}
issue I found with this, was that within dropdowns the downarrow GUI,
covers some of the text on the right.
That's why I never reset margins/padding for all elements, and just set
them (both!)
where it matters (body/h1/ul/li).
Jacobus van Niekerk wrote:
Hi all,
I know a lot of people use this:
* {
margin:0;
padding:0;
}
To help reduce code and eliminate lots of those strange default margins
issues.
Don't think this has been mentioned anywhere yet, but one issue I found with
this, was that within dropdowns the
I like it. It is nice, but I don't really like the colors. Green
like that really just dosen't appeal to me.
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:53:12 +1100, Jixor - Stephen I [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles Martin wrote:
Beautiful concept... I just would like to see the main column expand
to the
Jixor - Stephen I wrote:
It just wouldn't look as nice if it was wider, its a standard
characteristic of the zen designs that they are very narrow. However I
think in the case of the garden that is fine because its about showing
off css, not usability.
You're right. :) Guess all the wasted
Just a personal preference, but it is awesome looking.
Not only your personal preference...
As a showcase of some key features of CSS technology it's OK even if
it's not so usable, not em-sized etc.
Actually I think the colors are great, I love this combination of this
tint of green with that
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:34:18 -0600, Mani Sheriar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi All,
Take a gander at it here: http://www.manisheriar.com/zengarden2/
Mani Sheriar
Mani,
On a lighter note: I suppose if you were really twisted, and wanted to
freak 'em out, you could make it ugly as sin, readable
Thanks, Charles! Just to put in my two cents about the wasted space
issue
In general, I actually prefer fixed layouts to fluid. I have a wide
monitor and when divs take up all the available space on it they are
often unwieldy to read, not to mention less attractive.
The exception, I guess,
we arent designing for 600 * 480 anymore!
Well, maybe we'll begin again shortly - new PDAs are comming to the
market with VGA (480x640) resolution... :P
--
Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz | janbrasna.com
Stop IE! - http://www.stopie.com/ | http://browsehappy.com/
The design is lovely, but unfortunately, in ie5.5, your footer is
stuck to the left hand side of the screen, rather than where it should
be following on from the main column above.
pix
http://www.pixeldiva.co.uk
**
The discussion list for
That was it. Thanks. The two different widths are intentional, though.
I am filtering a slightly smaller width to Win IE, and another to the
rest...
Thanks.
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
mlinc.com
On Jan 13, 2005, at 9:13 PM, Jixor - Stephen I
Another method I've imagined but never implemented is for each added
function to add itself to an array of functions.
...
It's efficient. Your imagination is should try it.
Er, Your imagination is on the right track; you should try it.
My imagination, apparently, completes sentences that my
I know a lot of people use this:
* { margin:0; padding:0; }
To help reduce code and eliminate lots of those strange default margins
issues.
Don't think this has been mentioned anywhere yet, but one issue I
found with
this, was that within dropdowns the downarrow GUI, covers some of
the text
on
I hesitate to ask, now that the table thread has quieted down, but here goes:
How should I mark up text that's submitted as a Word table, especially when each cell may contain a mix of partial sentences, full sentences, list items? Sometime with three or four columns, and eight or ten rows?
Best
Hi
Marilyn
As the
one that started the last table thread, I would recommend providing us with an
example. Your request, like mine, can be interpreted in many ways.
Ted
-Original Message-From: Marilyn Langfeld
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 11:47
Marilyn Langfeld wrote:
How should I mark up text that's submitted as a Word table, especially
when each cell may contain a mix of partial sentences, full sentences,
list items? Sometime with three or four columns, and eight or ten rows?
It's a layout table, so - once we get over the fundamental
wait, now I'm confused.
table headers, thead/tbody, summary tags are structural?
I thought they were meant to define the data and were good.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 12:13 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Here's a simple example. Just two columns, two rows, one set of column heads and row heads within the main cells.
Column One:
Column Head: Objectives Recommended action lines for WHO
and Member States
Cell One:
x-tad-smallerPolicy
/x-tad-smallerx-tad-smaller- Ensure public policies
Ted Drake wrote:
wait, now I'm confused.
table headers, thead/tbody, summary tags are structural?
They give structure to tabular data.
I thought they were meant to define the data and were good.
Not when the data in question is not tabular data. If the table is used
for layout, it should not
Marilyn Langfeld wrote:
*Here's a simple example. Just two columns, two rows, one set of column
heads and row heads within the main cells.
Ok, right, that clarifies it. In this case you are, in effect, providing
tabular data - that wasn't quite clear from the original email. If I
understand it
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
If I
understand it correctly, here's the structure I'd suggest.
Actually, re-reading your example data, I did misunderstand your
structure. In fairness, it seems a bit convoluted. This is looking more
and more like a complex table that needs proper ids and header
Patrick has some great ideas, I like the use of list items in the cells to
simplify the presentation.
I started to put together a similar table and then thought it may not be the
best approach. I'm all for tables in the right instance. But this content you
are working on could be done with divs
Okay. I feel more confident then, if given text like my example. Thanks for the example markup. That does help.
I was beginning to wonder, after the earlier discussion, whether only numeric data could be semantically correct in a table.
Best regards,
Marilyn Langfeld
Mani Sheriar wrote:
In general, I actually prefer fixed layouts to fluid. I have a wide
monitor and when divs take up all the available space on it they are
often unwieldy to read, not to mention less attractive.
Actually, I had forgotten about that, but you're right. I've seen it
mentioned
Is it possible to use two or more ids in the body of a page?
I have a nav and a sub nav that I'd like to be able to light up. It seems
I can use unlimited class elements, but I can't get more than one id to work
at a time.
Wayne
**
The
Yes, it's possible. But dont have identical name for ID's. They don't
work that way.
--
Carmelyne Thompson
Web Architect/Developer
Wayne Godfrey wrote:
Is it possible to use two or more ids in the body of a page?
I have a nav and a sub nav that I'd like to be able to light up. It seems
I can use
Wayne Godfrey wrote:
Is it possible to use two or more ids in the body of a page?
Hi Wayne,
Id's have to be unique. i.e. only one per page.
you can reuse classes, though.
Cheers
Darren
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Wayne Godfrey wrote:
Is it possible to use two or more ids in the body of a page?
I have a nav and a sub nav that I'd like to be able to light up. It seems
I can use unlimited class elements, but I can't get more than one id to work
at a time.
By definition, an element can only have a single,
On 1/14/05 9:26 PM, Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By definition, an element can only have a single, unique id.
Boy do I feel dumb...
w
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
I must be tired. I can't see why this displays correctly in firebox but
not in ie. Anyone know? I can't give the url right now as it is
totaledlate here
.twikiLeftBar {background-image: url(/miner2.jpg); background-repeat:
no-repeat;
border-top:1px solid #ddd;
color:#800;
Mani Sheriar wrote:
Thanks, Charles! Just to put in my two cents about the wasted space
issue
In general, I actually prefer fixed layouts to fluid. I have a wide
monitor and when divs take up all the available space on it they are
often unwieldy to read, not to mention less attractive.
I
G'day
not in ie. Anyone know? I can't give the url right now as it is
totaledlate here
.twikiLeftBar {background-image: url(/miner2.jpg); background-repeat:
no-repeat;
border-top:1px solid #ddd;
color:#800;
overflow:hidden;
line-height:1.3em;
}
Hard to tell from this code snippet
Title: sam hutchinson / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can someone tell me why I am receiving
this rubbish???
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sam Hutchinson
Sent: Saturday, 15 January 2005
3:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] 2 WEEKS TONIGHT!
Funkdub @
Bert Doorn wrote:
not in ie. Anyone know? I can't give the url right now as it is
totaledlate here
.twikiLeftBar {background-image: url(/miner2.jpg); background-repeat:
no-repeat;
border-top:1px solid #ddd;
color:#800;
overflow:hidden;
line-height:1.3em;
}
I did get it working
34 matches
Mail list logo
