On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 00:26:54 +0100, Kim Kruse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Accesskeys:
[..snip accesskeys list..]
I'm not sure this is right at all. (I mean use accesskeys to navigate
the site with) Should accesskeys not only be used for important
links... like accesskeys page, sitemap etc?
IMO,
I think what would be more interesting is if browsers let you set your
rendering mode (quirks vs standards).
This would be really useful for testing purposes. However it would be
even more useful when writing user stylesheets. I wrote an accessible
user stylesheet a while back that changed
Andy Budd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think what would be more interesting is if browsers let you set your rendering mode (quirks vs standards).This would be really useful for testing purposes. However it would be even more useful when writing user stylesheets. I wrote an "accessible" user
Lukasz Grabun
Tab indices (indexes?) are helpful for those who use keyboards to
navigate webpages (for example me - I browse using elinks, mostly).
However it's useless to define tabindex if the natural tab order of a page
already makes sense.
Patrick
Patrick
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 23:31:20 +, David R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just out of curiosity...
Is the CSS3.0 Spec finalised, or are they still accepting suggestions
and comments?
Because I really want to suggest multiple background images for CSS3.0
(provided it isn't suggested already)
But nevertheless good timing, cause w3.org just released a Working
Draft of CSS3 Backgrounds and Borders Module.
And it has multiple background images.
Great news!
Maybe once when we'll all be old and CSS3 support will be common thing
among the browsers, we'll be able to tell our children how
Jan Brasna wrote:
Maybe once when we'll all be old and CSS3 support will be common thing
among the browsers, we'll be able to tell our children how this was
complicated in our times... ;)
In MY day we had to recreate FOUR DIVS to get rounded corners! *spits*
YOU don't appreciate the HARD WORK
I realise that many people have already responded.
Sorry for the echo. I'm not in the CSS working group, but
I do work for W3C.
On 17 Feb 2005, at 10:31, David R wrote:
Just out of curiosity...
Is the CSS3.0 Spec finalised, or are they still accepting suggestions
and comments?
I'm not sure there
Hi all,
I need the MAC girls guys ;) to help me out. Can you please send me a
screen grab of the following url
http://www.parachute.com/te/smallbusiness/
Browsers:
Safari 1.2
Netscape (which ever version you might have)
Firefox 1+
Please send the screen grabs directly to me. Please dont send
I'm a newbie, I admit, so allow me to ask a dumb question. Are there any
browsers currently supporting some of these CSS3 modules? I sure would like
to try some experimental stuff with these tags if there are...
ByteDreams
- Original Message -
From: Dean Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
There is some CSS3 support in Firefox and maybe Opera, I believe.
--Zachary
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:02:22 -0500, ByteDreams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a newbie, I admit, so allow me to ask a dumb question. Are there any
browsers currently supporting some of these CSS3 modules? I sure would
Jacobus van Niekerk wrote:
Hi all,
I need the MAC girls guys ;) to help me out. Can you please send me a
screen grab of the following url
http://www.parachute.com/te/smallbusiness/
Heard of http://www.browsercam.com/ perhaps?
Jeroen
PS: your character encoding is going bazerk (windows-1250?),
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:02:22 -0500, ByteDreams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a newbie, I admit, so allow me to ask a dumb question. Are there any
browsers currently supporting some of these CSS3 modules?
Yes. Experiments, some using CSS3, are in CSS section on literarymoose.info
Gecko support some
Thanks I got what I needed.
Kind Regards
Jacobus van Niekerk
Creative Consultant
web: http://www.catics.com/ | http://www.freelancecontractors.com
tel: + 27 21 982 7805
Jacobus van Niekerk wrote:
Hi all,
I need the MAC girls
(BOn 16 Feb 2005, at 22:16, Dmitry Baranovskiy wrote:
(B
(B Actually " is an inch symbol. For quotes we should use #147; and
(B #148; in normal text.
(B
$B!m(B - The double prime. U+2033. The inch
$B!l(B - The prime. U+2032. The foot
(Bhttp://mathworld.wolfram.com/DoublePrime.html
(B
Additionally:
Taken from http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/intro/sgmltut.html which is
an overview of looking at SGML
Content model definitions
The content model describes what may be contained by an instance of an
element type. Content model definitions may include:
The names of allowed or
Paul Connolley mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thursday, February 17, 2005 11:52 AM said:
Emphasis on Document text - PCDATA. Text **may** contain character
references. This doesn't imply that all of the four main html entities
have to be encoded (, , , and ). Note this document originally
I've just asked the W3C Validator. Test based on XHTML Strict.
PCDATA, document text (plike that/p):
allows '' and '' everywhere,
allows, but warns about '' with non-letter after it (' ', 'tag',
'123', '# ' are fine),
does not allow '' followed by a letter.
CDATA, attribute text (a href=this
ByteDreams wrote:
I'm a newbie, I admit, so allow me to ask a dumb question. Are there any
browsers currently supporting some of these CSS3 modules? I sure would like
to try some experimental stuff with these tags if there are...
Try Blake Scarborough's piece from last November: Looking Around
Hi to all!
Just a little off-topic...
I think that there might be many people who don't know about this service:
http://www.browsercam.com/
It's a site where you can get screen caps of your site from a large
variety of browsers and different system configurations. It's not free,
but there is a
Howdy, I've been coming signed up only a few weeks here and have read
only two dozen or so topics, mainly because I've been working on a new site
and have had midterms to study for (UCF student in Orlando). The site was
completed on the 11th though I am still working on backend PHP functionality.
Guys n Gals,
Itd be greatly appreciated if you could do a site
review of www.whatcanido.com.au. Currently
there is only a holding page but Im interested in what people
would have to say about the way Ive achieved the text wrapping.
The screen reader output in Fangs seems perfect so
Checked in IE 6.x SP2 and FF1.x (pc), loooks good in both. I like the
way you did the text wrapping. Why did you use 9 divs instead of 5
though? you only have 4 lines of text and that empty line. Was it just
so that if the text size was made much smaller it'll still wrap
nicely?
On Fri, 18 Feb
Hi Tatham,
the layout breaks in Opera 7.54u2/Win (the background is weirdly
positioned). Safari 1.1 and FF 1.0/Mac looks OK. IE 5.23/Mac badly
positions the main content area (some negative margins/positions?).
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: alphanumeric.cz | janbrasna.com
Stop IE! -
Looks
fine on netscape 7
but this is how it looks like on Opera7.52
http://wapcss.com/whatcan.gif
- Carmelyne Thompson
Itd be greatly
appreciated if you could do a site
review of www.whatcanido.com.au.
Currently
there is only a holding page but Im interested in what people
would
why? So that the summary is semantically different from the rest of the
content.
Terrence Wood.
Bert Doorn wrote:
Question: *why* do you want to use blockquote in the first place?
If it is purely for presentational purposes (indented block) I agree
that you are abusing the markup. Use CSS to
COOL!!! (O_O)
Yarr! I'm going to have to work on some of those.. (o_o)
*Specifically, IE5/Mac and Netscape 4.x/All. IE4/Win is blank, wonder why?
Very nice tool! I do wish it was free though...
--Zachary Hopkins
Juha-Markku Liikala wrote:
Hi to all!
Just a little off-topic...
I think that there
Netscape 4.x/All. IE4/Win is blank, wonder why?
I'd say what I think about these browsers,
but that kind of language is forbidden on this list ;)
Use @import to hide CSS from these browsers.
--
regards, Kornel Lesiski
**
The discussion list for
At 03:40 PM 2/17/2005, Tatham Oddie wrote:
Itd be greatly appreciated if you could do a site review of
http://www.whatcanido.com.au/www.whatcanido.com.au. Currently there is
only a holding page but Im interested in what people would have to say
about the way Ive achieved the text wrapping.
On 18 Feb 2005, at 2:42 am, Kornel Lesinski wrote:
I'm a newbie, I admit, so allow me to ask a dumb question. Are there
any
browsers currently supporting some of these CSS3 modules?
Yes. Experiments, some using CSS3, are in CSS section on
literarymoose.info
Gecko support some CSS3 selectors,
G'day
Terrence Wood wrote:
why? So that the summary is semantically different from the rest of the
content.
...
Bert Doorn wrote:
Question: *why* do you want to use blockquote in the first place?
If it is purely for presentational purposes (indented block) I agree
that you are abusing the
Levi,
You read my mind! Yeah - that was the basic reason.
Thanks a lot for the assistance.
Tat
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Levi
Sent: Friday, 18 February 2005 10:54 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site Review:
Great. Yet not so great
Thanks a lot for your assistance
Carmelyne.
Tat
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Carmelyne Thompson
Sent: Friday, 18 February 2005
11:33 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site Review:
can anyone tell me why the list bullets are not showing in ie6. they
appear to be working in firefox bar ie
any help much appreciated
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
sorry forgot the url - http://www.tyalgumstore.com.au/temp.html
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
Paul,
Thanks for the browser help...
In some ways I am also objecting to the way I used the spacers, but think it
was the most elegant solution that I could find. I checked it using Fangs,
and the screen reader output seems perfect. The only other option I could
think of was to use divs or
anyone tell me why the list bullets are not showing in ie6. they
appear to be working in firefox bar ie
Try adding
list-style-image: (url (images/dot.gif);
to #c #list
should fix it, can't give a logical explanation, it is to do with inheritance
and specificity. And FF and IE using
It's in your CSS. I am working on trying to find the specific answer.
It may be caused by incorrect css references through double id's..
I will send word when I find more.
--Zachary
simon dodson wrote:
can anyone tell me why the list bullets are not showing in ie6. they
appear to be working
Under #c #list,
removing,
float:left;
width: 128px;
will make the bullets work, but they hide behind the picture.
--Zachary
simon dodson wrote:
can anyone tell me why the list bullets are not showing in ie6. they
appear to be working in firefox bar ie
any help much appreciated
Thanks very much for that, Dejan.
Choose charset UTF-8 (not UTF-8 BOM) when saving.
Can you explain the difference?
Don't forget to mark up properly the Vietnamese content with div
lang=vi or such...
Now the one easy thing about this project is that Vietnamese already
contains all the unaccented
Working code:
+
#c #list{
float:left;
width: 128px;
margin: 20px 0 0 0;
padding: 0 0 0 25px;
font-weight: bold;
list-style-image: url(images/dot.gif);
}
+
*I believe your more global _ul_ command _#c ul_ might be causing your
problems.*
Choose charset UTF-8 (not UTF-8 BOM) when saving.
Can you explain the difference?
Hi John,
yes I'd be glad to explain the difference.
When saving in UTF, a Byte Order Mark (or BOM) can be added to signify
which type Unicode follows.
The bad news is that the BOM may make the file unreadable
Hi List,
long time lurker who is trying to get more courageous with CSS. I am
wondering what is the consensus for calling a style sheet. The @import
rule or the link href method :
style type=text/css media=screen
!--
@import url(p7pm/p7pmh10.css);
--
/style
Thanks for your message Kerry
Sorry for not picking up, I'm in a telecon at the moment.
I will have a look at the quote and the scheduling over the weekend and I
should be able to get a response to you by Monday/Tuesday.
There will be many increases in effeciency, but I'll attempt to put some
J. DesGeorges wrote:
I am wondering what is the consensus for calling a style sheet. The
@import rule or the link href method
...
I am confused as to the merits of both. If you can point me to a
resource that discusses this issue I would really appreciate it.
This might help:
45 matches
Mail list logo
