Slight issue.
I have a list of links with a nested list within one for the 's. The
nested listed is hidden
from view and made visable when the user clicks the parent .
It works fine, apart from for accessibility reasons how should i implement
this list? Users
with JS disabled but CSS enabled will
Hallo James,
James Jeffery:
>
>
> I have a list of links with a nested list within one for the 's. The
> nested listed is hidden
> from view and made visable when the user clicks the parent .
>
> It works fine, apart from for accessibility reasons how should i implement
> this list? Users
> with J
Hi James,
This might sound like a stupid idea - it's late and I haven't thought
it through fully, but can't you hide it the relevant nodes by
triggering something through onLoad on the body tag - that way if JS
is disabled the page will load with the lists expanded rather than
invisible.
Why does 'background-repeat:' determine the number of images to add?
background-image: url(1), url(2), url(3);
background-repeat: top, left, right, bottom;
is equal to
background-image: url(1), url(2), url(3), url(4);
background-position: top, left, right, bottom;
Would it not be better for it
Sorry made an error in the second example (url(4) should be url(1))
background-image: url(1), url(2), url(3);
background-repeat: top, left, right, bottom;
is equal to
background-image: url(1), url(2), url(3), url(1);
background-position: top, left, right, bottom;
On 11/12/07, James Jeffery <
> On Behalf Of James Jeffery
> I have a list of links with a nested list within one for the 's. The
nested listed is hidden
> from view and made visable when the user clicks the parent .
> It works fine, apart from for accessibility reasons how should i implement
this list? Users
> with JS disab
Hi all,
I'm trying to wrap up the page located at:
http://www.cprtools.net/international/inquiry.php
CSS:
http://www.cprtools.net/international/international.css
Issues I seem to be having:
1) Ideally, I'd like #head #general and the table to all appear as one
unit, with a white background, cent
Hello,
I am curious to see how others clear floats.
Here is the problem. Div one and two float left and take 50% of the
screen. Content is to go below the two floats.
one
two
Content
In the past I would use:
one
two
What method are you using to make this work in IE?
Thanks
Jamie
**
I used br clear: both until I read somewhere authoritive that it's
better to use a div.
So I started using a div and IE reared its ugly head on occasion.
Georg from Norway gave me an IE bug killer
(clear: both in CSS)
and I've had no more problems.
Hello,
I am curious to see how others
My preference would be to clear floats through the CSS and not through
adding in any additional markup. The code for this is below, so any two
elements being floated to sit side by side should be put in a container with
the class .clearfix.
I use this approach purely because I view this as a pres
Well, in my opinion - it's alway best practice to use CSS, e.g.
one
two
Content
...
div#one {float:left}
div#two {float:left}
div#content {clear:both}
That should do the trick for you. :)
On Nov 12, 2007 4:58 PM, Likely, James A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I am curious to
Hello James,
Maybe you can do this:
Left
Right
hope this can help you.
"Likely, James A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Best way to clear a float
Hello,
I am curious to see how others clear floats.
Here is the problem. Div one and two float left and take 50% of the s
On 12-Nov-07, at 9:28 PM, Likely, James A. wrote:
I am curious to see how others clear floats.
Jamie,
I often use this method [1]. It seems to work well, and far better
CSS-brains than myself have recommended it.
Best,
- Rahul.
[1] http://www.positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html
*
You don't have to even clear anything if you the parent div is floated
right such:
one
two
Content
div#parent {float:left}
div#one {float:left}
div#two {float:left}
that would work just fine without need to any clear at all!
M. Jama
big:interactive
91 P
Hi Jamie,
Easy clear is my current method of clearing also.
The only problem is that your css does not then validate (as
inline-block is from the css2.1 spec)
"This is a W3C Candidate Recommendation, which means the specification
has been widely reviewed and W3C recommends that it be implemente
Ray Leventhal wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to wrap up the page located at:
http://www.cprtools.net/international/inquiry.php
CSS:
http://www.cprtools.net/international/international.css
Issues I seem to be having:
1) Ideally, I'd like #head #general and the table to all appear as one
unit, with a
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:58:37 -0600, Likely, James A. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am curious to see how others clear floats.
>
*Sometimes* I find this works:
#parent {overflow: auto;}
This does require thorough testing, however.
Another simple method is the one Mohamed described - floats
always contai
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:58:37 -0600, Likely, James A. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am curious to see how others clear floats.
>
*Sometimes* I find this works:
#parent {overflow: auto;}
This does require thorough testing, however.
Another simple method is the one Mohamed described - floats
always contai
Why not just use clearfix?
On Nov 12, 2007 12:15 PM, David Hucklesby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:58:37 -0600, Likely, James A. wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am curious to see how others clear floats.
> >
>
> *Sometimes* I find this works:
>
> #parent {overflow: auto;}
>
>
*Sometimes* I find this works:
#parent {overflow: auto;}
You need to combine that with a width for it to work in IE. You might also
find in some situations that you need to use oveflow: hidden as auto will
create scrollbars.
--
Tyssen Design
www.tyssendesign.com.au
Ph: (07) 3300 3303
Mb: 0
> On Behalf Of John Faulds
>> *Sometimes* I find this works:
>> #parent {overflow: auto;}
> You need to combine that with a width for it to work in IE.
I think it is a hasLayout issue, so it is possible to make it work without
having to declare a width (using zoom:1 for example).
> You might a
This is an interesting discussion, I have always used on the page and then put
.cleardiv {height: 1em; clear:both;} in the style sheet. Not sure if this is
the best way, its seemed to work well without testing it too rigorously.
I've definitely got some new ideas now to try out though.
Tim
-
re -> using the 'clearfix' fix... as a way of clearing floats by
"not adding any additional markup"
i've always thought that argument was a bit of a stretch. You are
adding extra markup - and its hardcoded presentational markup. What
happens when you have class="clearfix" all through your code
On Nov 9, 2007 10:34 PM, Web Dandy Design <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a Social Networking Site Software / Script which is
> standards compliant? I've been hunting around and most scripts are table
> based and don't seem to be compliant/accessible.
Drupal can be, if you play
On this site,
body {background:#FFB701}
where footer wrap has opacity of 0.92 with a bg color
#ftr_wrap {background:#0d0d0d;
opacity:0.92;}
and 3 columns has
#col1, #col2, #col3 {background:#1a1a1a;}
I think Safari and Firefox got it right, that the 3 columns' elements
are 'inherit
Hi Tee
You are correct: Opera doesn't do opacity. The best way I have found is to use
an opaque transparent PNG, which will work on everything not IE6.
For IE6, use one of their opacity "filter:" things.
Not to helpful with those fade effects but it will work in your case.
With Opera I have a fe
You are correct: Opera doesn't do opacity.
Actually a quick test in Opera 9.24 (PC) shows that Opera does do opacity;
so opacity support isn't the issue. Perhaps a selector/inheritance issue?
Test case:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>
Opaci
On Nov 13, 2007, at 10:51 AM, Tee G. Peng wrote:
body {background:#FFB701}
where footer wrap has opacity of 0.92 with a bg color
#ftr_wrap {background:#0d0d0d;
opacity:0.92;}
and 3 columns has
#col1, #col2, #col3 {background:#1a1a1a;}
I think Safari and Firefox got it right, that t
On Nov 12, 2007, at 8:56 PM, Ben Buchanan wrote:
You are correct: Opera doesn't do opacity.
Actually a quick test in Opera 9.24 (PC) shows that Opera does do
opacity; so opacity support isn't the issue. Perhaps a selector/
inheritance issue?
Test case:
Hi Ben, thanks for the test. It
29 matches
Mail list logo
