If you have the capacity, I advise installing your own local copy.
Instructions are available from the W3C:
http://validator.w3.org/docs/install.html
There are similar instructions for the CSS validator:
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/DOWNLOAD.html
Thanks!
Lachlan Hardy
Can someone help me out with this validation?
this is a javascript for my menu which is inside my html page.
*Line 154, Column 39*: document type does not allow element li here.
$back = $('li class=back**div
class=left/div/li').appendTo
✉
At a guess, I'd say that the problem is caused by having your
javascript in the head of your document, which makes the validator try
to parse it (and so find li's in the head, where no li's should
be).
Simplest solution would be to move your javascript into an external
file and just link it into
After much googling around (I was fascinated by this question) and
much reading of various W3C documents here and there, I can say with
about 97.3% certainty that the W3C has never drafted a recommendation
that standardized file extensions. Most of their recommendations
include URI
Thanks Nate for the links.
I really want to focus on the usability impacts of pop-ups.
I'd love to see the AGIMO research that was done - do you have the name
of someone within the organisation that I could contact with regards to
sourcing this?
~ brad
Ward, Nathan wrote:
Hi Brad,
I don't
A question was raised at work today 'How do you mark up a poem'.
I looked into it but found nothing worthy. My original thought was to use
P's and class names, but one article I read said XML is perfect for this
case.
Whats your views on this, anyone actually did it before?
jody tate
Most of their recommendations
include URI examples that use the .html extension and the
site itself
appears to use .html extensions:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/Cover.html.
In fact, there's some advice that advocates ditching file extensions altogether
for future-proofing
Poetry is art and its really ugly to even try to mark it correctly.
There must be something that would work though and i have actually
tried with a really bad result.. http://kevinmcgeary.com/essay.html
With inherit and ems mixed with p there must be a way also where
beginning letter would be
Well yes, you could mark it up as XML behind the scenes, but you shouldn't be
sending XML to the browser. They might or might not be able to cope with it,
but you'd be breaking validation (unless you used XHTML sent as actual XML and
start namespacing things).
In simple terms, I'd mark up
I would suggest that this is pre. Poetry is generally so
display-specific that you couldn't hope to mark it up, I'd say.
Michael
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 19:08, James Jeffery
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A question was raised at work today 'How do you mark up a poem'.
I looked into it but found
True.
I still think there should be a stanard set of elements to mark up poems
though. Not checked if WG are doing anything in HTML 5 - i think they are.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Michael Cordover
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would suggest that this is pre. Poetry is generally so
Just another resource for those interested:
http://signified.com.au/a-poem-element-for-html5/
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:53 AM, James Jeffery
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True.
I still think there should be a stanard set of elements to mark up poems
though. Not checked if WG are doing anything
On 19 Jun 2008, at 10:08, James Jeffery wrote:
A question was raised at work today 'How do you mark up a poem'.
I looked into it but found nothing worthy. My original thought was
to use P's and class names, but one article I read said XML is
perfect for this case.
Whats your views on
To go off on a tangent Patrick, this is getting to be a rather common
excuse from some developers. If they don't want to change code, they
say it will break W3C standards.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:37 AM, Patrick H. Lauke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob Enslin wrote:
I recently started noticing
Jonathan D'mello
To go off on a tangent Patrick, this is getting to be a rather common
excuse from some developers. If they don't want to change code, they
say it will break W3C standards.
The core tenet of web standards is to choose the most
semantically/structurally appropriate way to
And the other excuse is that is that everybody use it. Just ask for proves
of that (both the standards and the numbers). Weak developers hide under
this false statements to avoid doing their job.
P.S. If they ask for your proves, you only have to show them the W3C pages.
They are in html, so
A question was raised at work today 'How do you mark up a poem'.
It depends on the form, really. For most poetry, I think paragraphs with
line breaks are appropriate. If the poem requires very specific positioning,
pre would be the first option as that doesn't rely on CSS. Finally if all
else
Are you sure they're not right?
I'd make them prove it
Joe
On Jun 19, 2008, at 11:11, Jonathan D'mello wrote:
To go off on a tangent Patrick, this is getting to be a rather common
excuse from some developers. If they don't want to change code, they
say it will break W3C standards.
On
Quoting Patrick Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jonathan D'mello
To go off on a tangent Patrick, this is getting to be a rather common
excuse from some developers. If they don't want to change code, they
say it will break W3C standards.
Sorry, I just re-read this and realised that I completely
On 19 Jun 2008, at 11:06, Jon Tan wrote:
On 19 Jun 2008, at 10:08, James Jeffery wrote:
A question was raised at work today 'How do you mark up a poem'.
I looked into it but found nothing worthy. My original thought was
to use P's and class names, but one article I read said XML is
Very good!
But I have to say they all sound the same. Did anyone spot any differences?
I think there may have been a difference in the second one but can't be
sure.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Jon Tan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19 Jun 2008, at 11:06, Jon Tan wrote:
On 19 Jun 2008, at
Many thanks for all the input.
Now for the fun part... go back to the CMS vendor who made the claim and ask
for some proof ;-)
Have a great day/night.
Rob
2008/6/19 Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Patrick Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jonathan D'mello
To go off on a tangent
Best tip for me for ages, thanks man!
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Gonzalo González Mora [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Hayden's Harness Attachment
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an Intranet site I wish to put through the HTML validator. How do I
validate
select custom install and install it to another directory (something like
/Mozilla/Firefox3) and the two will run side-by-side.
You can do this with Opera too.
:)
Paul
***
List Guidelines:
A poem is, essentially, a block quotation, is it not?
I'd probably be throwing in a cite attribute too :-)
http://reference.sitepoint.com/html/blockquote/cite
--
Andrew Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.woowoowoo.com
~~~ * ~~~
unsubscribe
Kind regards
Margaret
Margaret Cazabon
Parliamentary Web Manager
Department of Parliamentary Services
Parliament House
Canberra ACT 2600
phone 62772431
fax 62772400
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aph.gov.au
***
Hi Margaret,
I think you have to go here:
http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Gonzalo
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Cazabon, Margaret (DPS)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
unsubscribe
*Kind regards*
*Margaret *
Margaret Cazabon
Parliamentary Web Manager
Department of
I look after a poetry ezine site ( http://www.foame.org/) and that¹s what I
do.
For a lot of poets, the look of their poem on the page is very important.
Sometimes they want to make visual patterns with their stanzas ... always a
bit hit and miss, depending on browsers/platforms etc.
And then
Andrew Harris wrote:
A poem is, essentially, a block quotation, is it not?
Not if it's your own poem you're putting on your own page.
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
__
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-,
Not if it's your own poem you're putting on your own page.
Rubbish - I quote myself all the time! :)
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
Not if it's your own poem you're putting on your own page.
Rubbish - I quote myself all the time! :)
Don't you mean:
blockquote cite=me
Rubbish - I quote myself all the time! :)
/blockquote
:)
***
List Guidelines:
Must you Australian's *always* have the last say? ;)
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
not always, but often. esp if it ends in beer and a party
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Bennett [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 20 June 2008 12:12 PM
To: 'wsg@webstandardsgroup.org'
Subject: RE: [WSG] Marking Up Poems
Must
Thank you all. After installing Firefox 3.0 and the web developer 1.6, I went
to http://www.tereasangas.com and it seemed to work with my screen reader just
fine and I used the webdeveloper toolbar to validate the web site. The W3C
Validator gave a failed validation message;
Must you Australian's *always* have the last say? ;)
not always, but often. esp if it ends in beer and a party
Is that why what you say most often makes no sense?
:-)
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
***
List
Hayden's Harness Attachment wrote:
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.terasengas.com%2FHomes%2Fdefault.htm
I am really confused. Can anyone explain?
What the validator says:
There's one end-tag too many for a link on line 91. Delete one /A in
that line.
36 matches
Mail list logo
