James Jeffery wrote:
Thanks for the heads up guys. I know how to use blockquote, that's not
an issue, but I'm wondering if using cite would be worth it.
I won't be storing the URL from the original page. If I did citing the
orig. page that could get me into a while lot of trouble if I am
Jens-Uwe Korff wrote:
I'm running into big rendering differences between Google Chrome and
Safari 3.1/PC. They are said to render pages the same, given that
they're using the same Webkit engine.
They're using the WebKit engine, not necessarily the same version.
Safari is at version 3.2.1 last
Yes I don't think this is the place to ask advise on illegal matters.
Scraping content from websites that you do not have permission from is
copyright infringement. The fact that you don't want to cite the original
source inidcates to me that you are building this site for some financial
gain
Bringing it all back to the core question: cite is an optional
attribute, so can be omitted when using the blockquote element.
P
Patrick H. Lauke
Web Editor
Enterprise Development
University of Salford
Room 113, Faraday House
Salford, Greater Manchester
M5 4WT
UK
I think this comes down more to which font rasterisation engine a
system is using. I don’t think Safari on Windows for example has full
access to AAT and Quartz and thus will render type using ClearType and
GDI on Windows. Add Firefox into the mix which uses Cairo and you’ll
get different
Hi,
I want to know which is the best method.
I have seen a page where all the divs are positioned with position relative and
with top , bottom attributes instead of margin.. Is this a good method?
There is no browser compatibility issues while using this where as when using
margin properties
Using top and left properties in positioning is fine; using rel, pos+,
and absolute positioning for columns can actually be better than using
floats in that objects that expand past the width of a floated object
will not disrupt the layout of the page by bumping nearby floats down
the
Hi everybody,
Even though Chrome is based on Webkit, Chrome actually uses another
graphics/rendering engine (the drawing layer) called Skia (source code:
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/skia/).
A bit like the javascript engines, Google didn't use webkits' javascript
engine
Naveen Bhaskar wrote:
I have seen a page where all the divs are positioned with position
relative and with top , bottom attributes instead of margin.. Is
this a good method?
Depends entirely on the actual layout. I often use both relative offset
and margin push/pull on the same elements.
Just though I'd let you know about this, I actually think this is a pretty
serious problem, because it breaks a lot of scripts and doesn't conform with
the other browsers even though it conforms to the javascript spec.
V8 (chrome's js engine) can take the values in an array in a random order.
If
I think you may have missed the point of the earlier question - What can
flash bring to the learning environment that cannot be done with HTML,
CSS and JavaScript?
Regards,
Mike
PS: Please print and keep this email, as all paper these days comes from
managed forests, and therefore more trees
Any script that relies on an array being ordered, without actually doing
a sort() is seriously deficient. As you mentioned yourself, this
behaviour is entirely in agreement with the JS spec.
Regards,
Mike
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org
This is the Internet mate, the site owners of the sites I'm to be scraping
use the same methods. If I was to cite that site it would be wrong anyway
because they don't even own all the content.
If there is a financial gain, why sit back and let someone else gain from
it? I know a guy that does
I said indeed serious problem, although that is indeed debatable.
for in should indeed be used carefully, it's not quite reliable and browsera
all have different behaviours, although chrome's behaviour is the most
unreliable (if we can call it like that) due to the order of elements
returned.
last comment I will make on the matter - but theft is theft, because
someone else does it does not change the law... nor does the media that
you use.. the Internet still operates within the laws of the country
where you conduct business.
James Jeffery wrote:
This is the Internet mate, the
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Johan Douma
Sent: 08 January 2009 11:22
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Chrome and Safari render the same...or do they?
Just though I'd let you know about this, I actually think this is a
On Jan 8, 2009, at 8:49 AM, Adam Martin wrote:
but theft is theft, because someone else does it does not change
the law...
indeed...
but I'm losing track of what exactly this has to do with standards?
Andrew
***
List
It doesn't. I was supposed to email off list. Back to the question.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Andrew Maben and...@andrewmaben.com wrote:
On Jan 8, 2009, at 8:49 AM, Adam Martin wrote:
but theft is theft, because someone else does it does not change the law...
indeed...
but I'm
Exactly right. I've sadly watched Flash take over eLearning and still
haven't figured out the attraction, except that it offers the control of PPT
while appearing to be rich.There's only a very few types of web sites
that still use Flash for delivering primary content - media sites, those
People use position:relative
instead of margins to help avoid margin collapse.
Here's some links in case you aren't familiar with margin collapse.
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/box.html#collapsing-margins
http://www.andybudd.com/archives/2003/11/no_margin_for_error/
Michael
Turnwall
for all
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 16:36:45 +1100, Jens-Uwe Korff wrote:
Hi experts,
I'm running into big rendering differences between Google Chrome and Safari
3.1/PC.
They are said to render pages the same, given that they're using the same
Webkit engine.
The differences seem to be mainly due to the
Hi all,
thanks for your suggestions. I'm attaching a side-by-side comparison of
a snippet of the page since I cannot put any code live, hoping the
attachment gets delivered. Safari is on the left, Chrome on the right.
If you cannot see the attachment, it shows how the graphical background
22 matches
Mail list logo
