Re: [WSG] Progressive Enhancement related article

YES! THanks SO much! Sorry Mr. Clarke ;-) On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Simon Wilder wrote: > http://24ways.org/2009/ignorance-is-bliss is that article. Was by Andy > Clarke for 24ways. I hope this was the one you were after. > > On 16 Feb 2010, at 21:29, Tom Livingston wrote: > >> List

Re: [WSG] Progressive Enhancement related article

http://24ways.org/2009/ignorance-is-bliss is that article. Was by Andy Clarke for 24ways. I hope this was the one you were after. On 16 Feb 2010, at 21:29, Tom Livingston wrote: List, I recently came across an article - possibly by Roger Johansson - where in the article the author discussed

[WSG] Progressive Enhancement related article

List, I recently came across an article - possibly by Roger Johansson - where in the article the author discussed a web page design that was shown to 2 different people from the same client but in different locations. Based on the browser being used, they each received a different experience but e

Re: [WSG] Progressive Enhancement

> Also, IMHO, Google buried that date feature. I had to dig for it. ;-) Ha! You think that is buried?? Man, up until a few months ago it was hiding deep within the advanced search section. Personally, I wish the new Google sidebar would stay open. There is also a GreaseMonkey script that puts

Re: [WSG] Progressive Enhancement

>> >> I hate it when Google returns hits from years ago... Thank god they >> added that little sidebar where you can specify a date range. > > Interesting. Because imho, there are *great* articles out there that have > been written years ago. > A simple example that comes to mind is "onhavinglayout

RE: [WSG] Progressive Enhancement

> From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] > On Behalf Of Micky Hulse > Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 9:54 AM > To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > Subject: Re: [WSG] Progressive Enhancement > > Hi, > > > Does anyone have any good res

RE: [WSG] Progressive Enhancement

interested in seeing what findings you currently have, if you can send them to me, that would be great thanks. Hope that list helps too. Andrew Cooper > Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:23:49 -0500 > Subject: [WSG] Progressive Enhancement > From: tom...@gmail.com > To: wsg@webstandardsgro

Re: [WSG] Progressive Enhancement

Hi, > Does anyone have any good resources for current progressive > enhancement techniques and also talking points? Google has shown me > rather old articles, so I thought I'd hit you guys up for what you are I hate it when Google returns hits from years ago... Thank god they added that little si

Re: [WSG] Progressive Enhancement

I wrote a piece on progressive enhancement vs. graceful degradation a little while back. http://www.flexewebs.com/semantix/progressive-enhancement/ Probably could add some more concrete examples in there and make some more points, but it

[WSG] Progressive Enhancement

Hello list, Does anyone have any good resources for current progressive enhancement techniques and also talking points? Google has shown me rather old articles, so I thought I'd hit you guys up for what you are doing in this area now. I am going to be doing a presentation to coworkers and I'd lik