crikey, that's some list. thanks Russ.
It's disturbing how well lemurs can illustrate the issue, too:
http://www.katemonkey.co.uk/article/48/x-ua-lemur-compatible (the Zeldman
lemur cracked me up completely)
On the issue... it's something MS simply won't back down on no matter what
any of us
code for standards compliant browsers and let ie fall where it may.
dwain
On 1/24/08, Ben Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
crikey, that's some list. thanks Russ.
It's disturbing how well lemurs can illustrate the issue, too:
http://www.katemonkey.co.uk/article/48/x-ua-lemur-compatible
It's disturbing how well lemurs can illustrate the issue, too:
http://www.katemonkey.co.uk/article/48/x-ua-lemur-compatible (the Zeldman
lemur cracked me up completely)
That's awesome!
We can opt to save our energy for standards-based browsers and not
bother learning new versions of IE.
From: Ben Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
crikey, that's some list. thanks Russ.
On the issue... it's something MS simply won't back down on no matter what
any of us think. So we may as well figure out how to deal with it.
Discuss? :) Surely this list has some opinions...
It's all about numbers.
Ben Buchanan wrote:
Implementation specifics aside (yes I still think it's spam), the
version target feature offers us a chance to lock our sites to the
most convenient version of IE. MS has invited us to ignore their
newer products. We can opt to save our energy for standards-based
browsers
crikey, that's some list. thanks Russ.
On 24/01/2008, russ - maxdesign [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you been following the discussions on the IE8 and compatibility for the
last couple of days? For those that haven't been following it (or have
deliberately run away to hide), here are a few
