Issue with "short" calls that use DX
Well! This seemingly innocuous (but useful) thread has suddenly gotten much
more interesting. Popcorn please...who has the square for the first person to
say “if you don’t like it, scroll down”? 😁
73,
WB0CDY
From: Paul Randall
Repl
Actually, NO.
I've asked stupid questions on here, been pointed at the answer elsewhere and
regretted my lack of "go find it".
What I can say is I didn't make my questions into a boxed set, to be enjoyed
for a whole season.
If you've nothing better to do it may be a distraction but this forum is
rmation via it's UDP Message Protocol, you should use
that.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
On 31/05/2020 07:50, Paul Randall wrote:
Another feature suggestion.
Would it be possible to add the capability for WSJTx to report to a second
external program in addition to PSKreporter? I have an Android app that l
Another feature suggestion.
Would it be possible to add the capability for WSJTx to report to a second
external program in addition to PSKreporter? I have an Android app that lets me
keep tabs on what the radio is seeing whilst I am around the house or garden
but to use it means I must disconne
Yes, I have experienced receiving my own cq calls decoded as though they were
another station, complete with waterfall trace. Every instance, 100%
associated with watchdog timeout, which occurs part way through a TX period.
I appreciate a watchdog timeout needs to be far removed from normal
co
73 to that 73 as confirmation of the
confirmation of the confirmation!
73, Reino oh3mA
From: Paul Randall [mailto:paulfrand...@hotmail.com]
Sent: 27. helmikuuta 2020 22:46
To: k...@arrl.net; WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT4 and FT8 Contesting
”..And when one QSO partner rep
”..And when one QSO partner repeats either R-10 or RRR or RR73, it is
his indication that he didn't copy the ack,”
Surely that statement is wrong.
You only send RRR or RR73 to CONFIRM receiving the other stations “R” ack,
never to indicate no copy.
Sending R -10 means you copied the other
It may be unrelated but a station very local to me on 2m transmits a huge
wideband splat of noise at the start of his FT8 transmissions. I think what I
am hearing is all the noise in his shack, the fan in his qro linear etc, all
picked up by his microphone which presumably is still plugged in. W
When calling CQ dx on 80m at dusk (my loop is regularly heard in VK) there are
local EU stations that give me just a single call then disappear, presumably
just to be a PITA by triggering the "call 1st" feature on my rig. My answer is
to switch it off. It means I have to sit in front of the radi
“flinching.” Just a thought. 73,
Jim, W7XZ
From: Christopher Diederich via wsjt-devel
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2019 05:01
To: Paul Randall ; WSJT software development ;
wsjt-devel-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Christopher Diederich
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: 40 Meter Power USB-D issue
I will
Does it do it when the rig is running into a dummy load?
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
Original message
From: Christopher Diederich via wsjt-devel
Date: 20/11/2019 01:59 (GMT+00:00)
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, wsjt-devel-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Ch
t more attention to it than do others.
https://geology.com/articles/lightning-map.shtml
http://lightningsafety.com/nlsi_info/lightningmaps/US_FD_Lightning.pdf
http://lightningsafety.com/nlsi_info/lightningmaps/worldlightning.html
73, Jim K9YC
On 8/14/2019 4:52 AM, Paul Randall wrote:
> Th
n 8/12/2019 7:26 PM, Paul Randall wrote:
> The advice is written and in the UK would render you liable to
> litigation in the event of an accident. That is why I say it is unwise.
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourcefor
z + harmonics sidebands on FT8 signals? (Paul
Kube)
On 8/10/2019 6:09 PM, Paul Randall wrote:
> Jim
>
> Double insulated equipment like a laptop charger doesn’t have any
> physical access to a metal part that can be bonded to ground. That’s
> what double insulated means. Even if the c
en wires are bonded together.
When all of this done, the station is safe for lightning, and no
"isolation" is needed.
Details of proper practice is at http://k9yc.com/GroundingAndAudio.pdf
73, Jim K9YC
On 8/8/2019 3:43 AM, Paul Randall wrote:
> The point of the isolated interface is t
whoosh - sharp intake of breath
Rich you are Sooo... picky,
73 = best regards
73s = more than one best regards
73's = 73, his best regards.
As I understand, 's is possesive, so "Richard's email" is shorthand for
"Richard, his email". I'd love to be corrected.
Nice to see the new world is equally
d and
viewing the signal output with a spectrum analyzer and the term for the signal
produced with “0” bars of “ALC” showing was “icky” at best (very technical, I
know :) ).
Just a word of caution for anyone following this thread.
73,
Jim S.
N2ADV
On Apr 12, 2019, at 2:06 PM, Paul Ra
Start-of- transmission power spikes will almost certainly occur on any radio
which is using traditional alc to control output power. Spike severity is
directly linked to the amount of gain reduction the alc is giving. For example,
a 100w rig with power output reduced to 5w using a power control
Ed
I can reproduce this on my setup where my antenna is not good for 160m -
causing bad RFI which crashes the USB audio link to the PC. If I start
transmission on 160m with very low power and ease it up I get almost to full
power before the link fails.
I’ve seen no evidence of a spike, actua
Hi, as others have suggested, almost certain reason for this is during the 1 –
2 seconds of transmit that you got, your RF took out the USB link between sound
card and PC.
I can generate this problem on demand just by trying to operate on 160m where
my loop antenna is extreme high impedance and
Hi Phil, this happens to me 2 or 3 times in a session.
To be specific, all message boxes are always correctly filled with the my own
and my qso partners callsigns. When the problem occurs, the message appears in
the "rx frequency" window with the qso partners callsign replaced with someone
elses
ows 10
From: Bill Somerville
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 10:34:59 AM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT Reporting to PSK Reporter
On 30/01/2019 23:23, Paul Randall wrote:
Bill, in one of your messages to Phil you wrote “...You can be spotted
:50
De: "Paul Randall"
À: "wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
Objet: [wsjt-devel] WSJT Reporting to PSK Reporter
Hi, I got this address from the WSJT website. I am new to this group
and not sure of the protocols. I tried emailing yesterday but am unsure if this
was receiv
for type B callsigns received without
a QRA?
Many thanks for your attention.
Paul Randall
G3NJV
PS After completing this email I checked the PSK Reporter website again. Sure
enough there were just 5 reception reports, four from monitors using Red Pitaya
but also a single report from K1HTV
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
From: Paul Randall
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 9:38:41 AM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: WSJT-X V2.0.0 WINDOWS 10 REPORT
Hi, I am operating as VK2/G3N
25 matches
Mail list logo
