Re: [wsjt-devel] CMake 4.0 compatibility (and Fortran issue)

2025-07-28 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 8:33 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > I "fixed" it by adding "-z noexecstack" to LDFLAGS but I'm not sure it's a > good idea to add this as a global linking flag. > That is indeed a bad idea, it breaks other fortran objects... I also tried applying -no-automatic to just the fort

Re: [wsjt-devel] CMake 4.0 compatibility (and Fortran issue)

2025-07-22 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
I "fixed" it by adding "-z noexecstack" to LDFLAGS but I'm not sure it's a good idea to add this as a global linking flag. Thanks, Richard KF5OIM ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ws

[wsjt-devel] CMake 4.0 compatibility (and Fortran issue)

2025-07-22 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
Fedora will be upgrading to CMake 4.0 which is dropping compatibility with CMake versions < 3.5. This means that setting CMAKE_MINIMUM_REQUIRED < 3.5 will exit with an error. My workaround for Fedora is to set CMAKE_POLICY_VERSION_MINIMUM=3.5 as an environment variable or passed as an option to C

[wsjt-devel] 2.7.0 source archive oddities

2024-09-13 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
I received a report of issues installing on aarch64 for some test packages I build: Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package wsjtx-2.7.0-3.fc40.aarch64 - nothing provides libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) needed by wsjtx-2.7.0-6.fc40.aarch64 from updates - nothing provides lib

Re: [wsjt-devel] Adjustable frequency shift for split operation?

2024-07-06 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 7:49 PM Adrian wrote: > Richard, Can you tell us the alc meter indication on each of these 1500 > -1999 power levels that you describe ? > > The alc indication, may provide clues as to whether audio(modulation) > level is a factor ? > That doesn't appear to be the case. at

Re: [wsjt-devel] Adjustable frequency shift for split operation?

2024-07-06 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 12:36 PM Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > >This does make me wonder though, why only jump in 0.5KHz increments? Not > that the logic is difficult but wouldn't it be simpler to just allow a > "sweet spot" setting and use that to offset

Re: [wsjt-devel] Adjustable frequency shift for split operation?

2024-07-06 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 9:16 AM Michael Pittaro via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Richard, > Also check the mode the TX VFO is using to make sure it's actually DATA. > My FT-891 is a similar radio and more than once when running true split, > VFO B / TX has been in SSB mod

Re: [wsjt-devel] Adjustable frequency shift for split operation?

2024-07-06 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 10:16 PM Black Michael wrote: > And does the power go back up when you go above 1900? > > Sounds like it might be a notch filter. > Doesn't seem to be the problem. The highest I can get is 1999Hz before the frequency changes but it's still <5W. I checked the data options

Re: [wsjt-devel] Adjustable frequency shift for split operation?

2024-07-05 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 8:21 PM Andrew Neumeier via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Richard, > > On the 991a, you might consider taking a look at the SSB Bandwidth > setting, menu item 110. Perhaps altering it might help. > I changed it to 100-3000 which seems to be the wi

Re: [wsjt-devel] Adjustable frequency shift for split operation?

2024-07-05 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 5:46 PM Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hi Richard, > > You are misinformed, or perhaps I have misunderstood what you attempted > to describe. "Split" operation in WSJT-X, properly configured with > either the "Rig" or "Fake it" option

[wsjt-devel] Adjustable frequency shift for split operation?

2024-07-05 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
I was playing around on 20m this afternoon and was trying to make a contact in Wales when I noticed that I was only putting out about 10W. When I'm closer to the center I aim to put out about 50W. If split operation is "a thing" already, why not more aggressively try to center the frequency? I don

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-x 2.7.0-rc4 ARRL field day issue

2024-06-22 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
Never mind figured it out... Thanks On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 9:27 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > Am I missing something? I'm trying to setup my station to run for FD but > when I try to save the configuration it keeps telling me "Invalid Context > Exchange" but I have everything filled out... > > [ima

[wsjt-devel] wsjt-x 2.7.0-rc4 ARRL field day issue

2024-06-22 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
Am I missing something? I'm trying to setup my station to run for FD but when I try to save the configuration it keeps telling me "Invalid Context Exchange" but I have everything filled out... [image: image.png] [image: image.png] Thanks, Richard KF5OIM ___

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fortran error on Fedora 40+

2024-06-18 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
Forgot to mention this did the trick, but did it make it into wsjtx? Thanks, Richard ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

[wsjt-devel] Fortran error on Fedora 40+

2024-05-30 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
Doing some test builds of current RC4 and seeing build failures: /builddir/build/BUILD/wsjtx-2.7.0/wsjtx/qmap/libqmap/decode0.f90:6:28: 6 | real*4 dd(2,NSMAX),ss(400,NFFT),savg(NFFT) |1 Error: Variable ‘nfft’ cannot appear in the expression at (1) /build

Re: [wsjt-devel] Problem with WSJT-X 2.7.0 RC3 and Hamlib +Flrig

2024-01-30 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
Dave just posted a new alpha, I'll test with it first to see if it's resolved. Thanks, Richard KF5OIM ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Problem with WSJT-X 2.7.0 RC3 and Hamlib +Flrig

2024-01-29 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 10:16 PM Black Michael wrote: > What rig? For some reason that call is not returning any value for your > rig when getting the current mode. > FT-991A Thanks, Richard ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.ne

[wsjt-devel] Problem with WSJT-X 2.7.0 RC3 and Hamlib +Flrig

2024-01-28 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
I decided to test out the RC3 release and everything comes up fine but as soon as I try to change TX frequency in the waterfall or make a contact I get something like this: Rig Control Error Hamlib error: Content-length: 168 xml_parse2: value returned='' xml_parse2: xml=' ' flrig_transacti

Re: [wsjt-devel] Hamlib fork repository

2023-11-08 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 4:27 PM Matt Melling via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hi, > > I am hacking on the WSJT-X package in NixOS, and looking at how we can > split out the hamlib fork in to a separate package that can be shared > with our js8call package. > On Fedora we

Re: [wsjt-devel] COPR build for 2.7.0 RC1

2023-05-23 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 9:42 AM Jeff Stillinger via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Yes, I think we need a focused effort as a whole ham radio community on > 9. I love what they have done with Rocky 9 (RHEL 9) so far. It was > just the "face lift" that 8 needed. Howev

[wsjt-devel] COPR build for 2.7.0 RC1

2023-05-22 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
I have just completed builds for all released versions of Fedora and EPEL 8. Let me know if there's any interest in EPEL 9. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/WSJT/build/5941850/ Thanks, Richard KF5OIM ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-d

Re: [wsjt-devel] Compile fails

2023-05-22 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 6:59 AM Brian Morrison via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > On Sun, 21 May 2023 21:31:44 -0500 > Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel wrote: > > > On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 9:13 PM jarmo via wsjt-devel < > > wsjt-deve

Re: [wsjt-devel] Compile fails

2023-05-21 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 9:13 PM jarmo via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Did git pull for wsjtx, tried to compile, failed... > > /home/oh1mrr/wsjtx/qmap/libqmap/q65c.f90:23:39: > >23 |ndepth,ndiskdat,neme,newdat,nfa,nfb,nfcal,nfshift, >& > |

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjtx 2.6.1

2023-01-20 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
Packages are built and working their way into the repo. F37: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-cdac6441cd F36: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-3877f14b73 Currently they are in the "pending" state but once they hit testing they can be installed: $ sudo dnf --

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjtx 2.6.1

2023-01-19 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:38 AM Brian Morrison via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 04:12:23 +0200 > jarmo via wsjt-devel wrote: > > > So far working here... Compiled from GIT. > > Anyone seen Fedora 37 rpm yet? > > Well, I built and installed rpms for

Re: [wsjt-devel] Link to latest WSJT-X source .tgz for use on the command-line?

2023-01-01 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
On Sun, Jan 1, 2023 at 11:56 AM Kari Sillanmäki via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hi Onno, > > I've been poking around the SourceForge webpages but could not find a way > to download latest tgz with one single command. > Umm I posted this earlier, are my emails not m

Re: [wsjt-devel] Link to latest WSJT-X source .tgz for use on the command-line?

2022-12-30 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
This works for sourceforge, just substitute the name and version: https://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

[wsjt-devel] End of line character changed?

2022-08-24 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
Trying to build RC3 test packages for Fedora I get: + desktop-file-validate /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/wsjtx-2.6.0-0.3.fc38.x86_64/usr/share/applications/message_aggregator.desktop /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/wsjtx-2.6.0-0.3.fc38.x86_64/usr/share/applications/message_aggregator.desktop: error: file c

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT-991A WSJT-X unusable for me

2022-01-16 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 11:56 AM Black Michael via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > There was a bug in the FT991 capabilities which has been fixed. Waiting > to hear if it fixes the chatter. > So far so good. Trying to work Puerto Rico on 20m right now. Next I'll try fl

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT-991A WSJT-X unusable for me

2022-01-16 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 11:03 AM DG2YCB, Uwe via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Richard, > > > > Can you rule out that this is not an RF interference? Because my FT-991 > runs flawlessly with WSJTX v2.5.4 on Linux Mint 20.2. > Nothing else appears to be affected. Fldigi r

[wsjt-devel] FT-991A WSJT-X unusable for me

2022-01-16 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
Fedora Linux 35 hamlib master (as of a couple of days ago) WSJT-X 2.5.4 That being said, this has been a problem for some time for me over the last couple of hamlib releases and several WSJT-X releases. Mike has worked with me a couple of times to fix this, but it never STAYS fixed. When trying t

[wsjt-devel] Fedora + FT-991A can't get 2.5.0 to work

2021-10-24 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
I had a few minutes to do more investigation and I just can't get 2.5.0 (or 2.5.1) to work while 2.4.0 does. Here's my observations: WSJT-X 2.5.1 / Hamlib master - FT-991 1. Radio does not immediately set split operation. 2. Using band dropdown or settings->Radio->Test CAT, OK starts split operat

Re: [wsjt-devel] Some minor issues.

2021-10-17 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 9:08 AM Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Il 17/10/21 03:47, jarmo via wsjt-devel ha scritto: > > Wed, 29 Sep 2021 16:15:00 + (UTC) > Black Michael via wsjt-devel > > kirjoitti: > > Hi Mike > > Compiled latest git version 4.4

[wsjt-devel] No audio (RF) output with 2.5.0

2021-10-03 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
I need to go back and read the posts about this but right now I'm doing this as a "me too" post. Fedora 34 with WSJT-X 2.5.0, built in my COPR as the WSJT-X maintainer for Fedora. I get no RF output and have triple checked my settings. Fldigi and pat/ardop (winlink client) work fine. Thanks, Ric

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.5.0 GA Release

2021-09-28 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
Until I have time to personally test the Fedora build I have made it available through my COPR: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/WSJT/ Thanks, Richard KF5OIM ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.so

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.5.0 GA Release

2021-09-28 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 9:45 AM Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Your build has many compiler options we have not tested with, do you > really need to use them all? > > -grecord-gcc-switches > -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 > -Wp,-D_GLIBC

Re: [wsjt-devel] Blocked?

2021-08-06 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 8:31 AM jarmo via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Fri, 6 Aug 2021 08:06:36 -0500 > Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel > kirjoitti: > > > You can use my COPR test packages if using Fedora, or worst case > > download and un

Re: [wsjt-devel] Blocked?

2021-08-06 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
You can use my COPR test packages if using Fedora, or worst case download and unpack the RPM to get the source: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/WSJT/build/2365258/ $ rpm2cpio .rpm | cpio -idmv Thanks, Richard KF5OIM ___ wsjt-devel ma