Yes
On 1/12/2019 11:42, nick wrote:
In wsjtx-2.0.0 the state of the CQ Only checkbox is not saved on exit.
There is no entry for it in WSJT-X.ini.
Is this by design?
73
Nick
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://list
In wsjtx-2.0.0 the state of the CQ Only checkbox is not saved on exit.
There is no entry for it in WSJT-X.ini.
Is this by design?
73
Nick
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-
Hi!
This small patch seems to stop duplicate decodes in
BandActivity/UDP/ALL.TEXT and makes touching "CQ only" to take *effect
from next decode onwards*.
Just what I tried to describe...
--
Saku
OH1KH
Bill Somerville kirjoitti 06.04.2018 klo 19:43:
On 06/04/2018 17:39, Bill Somerville wr
Hi
Without looking at source I see that simple "all fixing" repair would be taking
"CQ only" state change to account from *next* decode, not replaying the last
one again.
That should not be very complex solution, and as said fixes "all in one go".
They say that there is also an OS that does n
On 06/04/2018 17:39, Bill Somerville wrote:
this is not really a defect. If you have "CQ Only" checked then non-CQ
decodes are discarded and cannot be recovered. Un-checking the option
causes the decoder to redo the decode on the sample buffer. The same
applies to checking the "CQ Only" option
Hi Saku,
this is not really a defect. If you have "CQ Only" checked then non-CQ
decodes are discarded and cannot be recovered. Un-checking the option
causes the decoder to redo the decode on the sample buffer. The same
applies to checking the "CQ Only" option except that CQ decodes are
discar
Hi!
To what I previously said I will add to that bug report also that:
Not only UDP datagrams get replayed without new flag set to false, but
also ALL.TXT will get it's content added again with this replay's decodes.
Both can happen so many times as one can do change of "CQ only" checbox
stat
Hi !
I'm currently testing with r8576 and it seems that today svn either do
not response at all, or if it does it is very slow so I can not test
with the very latest version. But when browsing commits there is no
indication of this bugfix.
One minor issue with "CQ only":
If checkbox state i
Hi Bob,
On 2/28/2018 5:36 AM, Bob Thornton via wsjt-devel wrote:
I don’t believe this check box has any function in WSPR mode, could it be
deleted or else documented that it has no function in WSPR.
Bob Thornton
Thanks for the suggestion. It will be done.
-- Joe, K1JT
I don’t believe this check box has any function in WSPR mode, could it be
deleted or else documented that it has no function in WSPR.
Bob Thornton
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
enga
10 matches
Mail list logo
