Hi
Without looking at source I see that simple "all fixing" repair would be taking
"CQ only" state change to account from *next* decode, not replaying the last
one again.
That should not be very complex solution, and as said fixes "all in one go".
They say that there is also an OS that does not have any bugs, they are just
properties. :D :D
--
Saku
OH1KH
6. huhtikuuta 2018 19.43.01 GMT+03:00 Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com>
kirjoitti:
>On 06/04/2018 17:39, Bill Somerville wrote:
>> this is not really a defect. If you have "CQ Only" checked then
>non-CQ
>> decodes are discarded and cannot be recovered. Un-checking the option
>
>> causes the decoder to redo the decode on the sample buffer. The same
>> applies to checking the "CQ Only" option except that CQ decodes are
>> discarded. If you do not want duplicated UDP Decode messages nor
>> duplicates in the ALL.TXT file then all I can suggest is that you do
>> not use the "CQ Only" option. BTW it is possible that the repeated
>> decode passes may have different results if the Rx audio offset,
>> decode depth, waterfall width, or AP settings have been changed.
>
>Fixing a critical typo:
>
>this is not really a defect. If you have "CQ Only" checked then non-CQ
>decodes are discarded and cannot be recovered. Un-checking the option
>causes the decoder to redo the decode on the sample buffer. The same
>applies to checking the "CQ Only" option except that *non-* CQ decodes
>are discarded. If you do not want duplicated UDP Decode messages nor
>duplicates in the ALL.TXT file then all I can suggest is that you do
>not
>use the "CQ Only" option. BTW it is possible that the repeated decode
>passes may have different results if the Rx audio offset, decode depth,
>
>waterfall width, or AP settings have been changed.
>
>73
>Bill
>G4WJS.
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>_______________________________________________
>wsjt-devel mailing list
>wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
