Hi Joe, Steve and Bill,
FT8 busy on 20m this afternoon. r7752 operational on Mac OSX 10.11 without
problems…
— John G4KLA
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites,
On 30/06/2017 02:24, Roger Rehr W3SZ wrote:
Bill G4WJS had given a warning on June 9 to "Beware if building from
development sources" with revisions later than r7703, due to some
transmission modulation issues.
Given the recommendations for us to try JT8 and the great enthusiasm
being shown
...build went like a breeze, just did an svn co and followed
instructions in INSTALL. (Revision 7752)
I might be able to try the new mode tonight around 2230 UTC
Cheers,
Tamas HA5FTL
2017-06-29 20:47 keltezéssel, Tamás Fábián írta:
I'm going to try and compile it on Ubuntu 17.04 "zesty"
Bill G4WJS had given a warning on June 9 to "Beware if building from
development sources" with revisions later than r7703, due to some
transmission modulation issues.
Given the recommendations for us to try JT8 and the great enthusiasm
being shown for it by users now running r7750 or later, is
Is this a linux version or mac?
Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
From: David Tiller <dtil...@captechconsulting.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 5:02:35 PM
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8: Potential new mode f
Hi Bill,
I tried to connect with you a couple times, but I wasn't making it in on
your side. I think the best I had you was ~ -16gb or so, maybe a little
better.
Looks like us HF sloth's are gonna have to learn how to operate VHF high
speed mode :-)
G.
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Bill
Here's an issue "I think".
If you set (check) auto-seq, then, during the QSO, set a different response
than what it expects, say 73's instead of the RRR message, WSJT-X
automatically sends the report message message if the other station sent a
report instead of RRR. I got caught in a do-loop with
Would love you give it a try if there is a OS X version somewhere…Gary KO3F
> On Jun 29, 2017, at 7:28 PM, Laurie, VK3AMA <_vk3a...@vkdxer.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 30/06/2017 9:10 AM, Joe Taylor wrote:
>> Is anyone using "T10"? When I've checked recently, usage seemed to be close
>> to zero.
>>
@lists.sourceforge.net >> WSJT software development
<wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8: Potential new mode for fast QSOs
On 30/06/2017 9:10 AM, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Is anyone using "T10"? When I've checked recently, usage seemed to be
> clo
On 30/06/2017 9:10 AM, Joe Taylor wrote:
Is anyone using "T10"? When I've checked recently, usage seemed to be
close to zero.
In any eveny, we had no idea that "~" was being used to flag a T10
decode. (Or, for that metter, that you were using those flags in
JTAlert.)
Maybe you can tell
On 30/06/2017 00:10, Joe Taylor wrote:
Maybe you can tell it's FT8 because I (mistakenly) left two spaces
between "~" and the start of message, rather than one. :-)
Hi Joe & Laurie,
I would take that as a joke! It will have to change as too much relies
on the exact positioning of the message
say though
that I am very pleased with the auto-sequencing.
-Original Message-
From: Laurie, VK3AMA [mailto:_vk3a...@vkdxer.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 5:36 PM
To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8: Potential new mo
Hi Laurie,
On 6/29/2017 6:35 PM, Laurie, VK3AMA wrote:
The "~" mode character will be a problem. It is the character chosen by
JTDX for the T10 mode and would explain an earlier message that
indicated that a FT8 spot on HamSpots appeared as T10 (likely came from
JTAlert which spots "~"
On 30/06/2017 7:41 AM, Dan Malcolm wrote:
I also notice that there is a
tilde between "Freq" and "Message" in the "Band Activity" window. Is that
an FT8 encoding indicator or a place holder?
The "~" mode character will be a problem. It is the character chosen by
JTDX for the T10 mode and
holder?
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 4:27 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8: Potential new mode for fast QSOs
On 29/06/2017 22:19, Dan Malcolm wrote:
> I also noticed that the
On 29/06/2017 22:19, Dan Malcolm wrote:
I also noticed that the
dropdown band list did not have an entry for 20m FT8. I was a simple matter
to add it. I assume some of this is because FT8 is new and just in the
experimental stage. Presumably these things will be taken care of in due
course
, 2017 10:33 AM
To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [wsjt-devel] FT8: Potential new mode for fast QSOs
Dear Development Colleagues,
Steve (K9AN) and I have developed a potential new mode for WSJT-X.
We're calling the mode "FT8" (Franke-Tayl
Hi Wolfgang,
Was your QSO on 50.313? Will this be a good operating frequency for FT8
in IARU Region 1 ?
-- Joe, K1JT
On 6/29/2017 3:10 PM, Wolfgang wrote:
Hello all,
had my first QSO with CT1FBK a few minutes ago.
Thanks Miguel, CT1FBK, for the reply to my very first CQ
Next QSO
Title: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8: Potential new mode for fast QSOs
Hello all,
had my first QSO with CT1FBK a few minutes ago.
Thanks Miguel, CT1FBK, for the reply to my very first CQ
Next QSO was with F1ABL
Smooth, fast and fine :-)
73 de Wolfgang
OE1MWW
--
Amateur radio is the most
I'm going to try and compile it on Ubuntu 17.04 "zesty" (Linux
4.10.0-26-generic x86-64) at next weekend.
If someone happens to be faster, and can send me a binary, I'll surely be
on the air ;)
Cheers,
Tamas HA5FTL
2017-06-29 20:32 GMT+02:00 George J Molnar :
> Compiled and
Also compiled and running without issues. Decoded NV0O on 17 meters (I was
working on the honeydo list around the house so wasn't able to respond) but am
back on 17 now and calling CQ.
73,
Jim S.
N2ADV
> On Jun 29, 2017, at 2:32 PM, George J Molnar wrote:
>
> Compiled
Compiled and run without incident on Mac OS 10.12.6 (beta). Monitored signal
quality seems good.
No contacts… yet!
George J Molnar
Nevada, USA
KF2T @GJMolnar
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the
...@princeton.edu]
Sent: June 29, 2017 18:15
To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8: Potential new mode for fast QSOs
Hi Jay,
On 6/29/2017 2:02 PM, Jay Hainline wrote:
> I made my first QSO with the new mode with N8JX. It seems to work
...@princeton.edu]
Sent: June 29, 2017 15:33
To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [wsjt-devel] FT8: Potential new mode for fast QSOs
Dear Development Colleagues,
Steve (K9AN) and I have developed a potential new mode for WSJT-X.
We're calling the mode "F
I'm compiling now - count me in!
73,
Jim S.
N2ADV
> On Jun 29, 2017, at 1:43 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
>
>> On 29/06/2017 18:37, char...@sucklingfamily.free-online.co.uk wrote:
>> Built and running - no on-air tests yet.
>
> Hi Charlie,
>
> if you want a test QSO
On 29/06/2017 18:37, char...@sucklingfamily.free-online.co.uk wrote:
Built and running - no on-air tests yet.
Hi Charlie,
if you want a test QSO I'm sure we can find a band we can work on.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
--
Check
Hi Charlie,
On 6/29/2017 1:37 PM, G3WDG wrote:
Built and running - no on-air tests yet.
Noticed that the 15s period is insufficient to get the cw id in.
RR, we're aware of this. Will probably need to devote a full Tx period
to CW ID, for those who need it.
-- Joe, K1JT
Hi Joe
Built and running - no on-air tests yet.
Noticed that the 15s period is insufficient to get the cw id in.
Charlie
> Dear Development Colleagues,
>
> Steve (K9AN) and I have developed a potential new mode for WSJT-X.
> We're calling the mode "FT8" (Franke-Taylor design, 8-FSK
28 matches
Mail list logo