Thanks.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 9:22 PM Joe Taylor wrote:
> That's "TEST" as in "CONTEST".
>
> On 1/19/2019 21:16, Edfel Rivera wrote:
> > Hi Again:
> >
> > I am also limited to the 6m band for testing and propagation not good
> > for Caribbean. It make testing more difficul
That's "TEST" as in "CONTEST".
On 1/19/2019 21:16, Edfel Rivera wrote:
Hi Again:
I am also limited to the 6m band for testing and propagation not good
for Caribbean. It make testing more difficult. However was able to make
some regular QSO with station in FL.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Sat, Jan
Hi Again:
I am also limited to the 6m band for testing and propagation not good for
Caribbean. It make testing more difficult. However was able to make some
regular QSO with station in FL.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 9:12 PM Edfel Rivera wrote:
> Hi Joe:
>
> CQ goes "CQ Test". I
Hi Joe:
CQ goes "CQ Test". If that is intended behavior will check again.
Thanks.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 9:04 PM Joe Taylor wrote:
> NA VHF Contest messages are working perfectly here -- and for everyone I
> am working. What do you consider "broken" ?
>
> --
NA VHF Contest messages are working perfectly here -- and for everyone I
am working. What do you consider "broken" ?
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
On 1/19/2019 20:56, Edfel Rivera wrote:
Hi:
Not sure it was stated, when settings NA VHF, functionality seems broken
compared with RU. Unless
Hi:
Not sure it was stated, when settings NA VHF, functionality seems broken
compared with RU. Unless am not doing it right.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-
Hi, some recent 50 MHz activity between Europe and VK/ZL has shown that the
dreaded popup for NA VHF Contest mode still occurs during normal operations.
When double clicking on a CQ from a europe station on 50 MHz, the popup
occurs and then takes focus, this popup is not always on top of the main
Hi Peter,
Unfortunately, take-up and use of WSJT-X by VK and ZL VHF operators --
at least by those who report back to us -- was rather slow during the
"candidate release" periods of v1.8.0-rc1 and -rc2. We can't fix what
we don't know is broken.
The first we heard of this problem was 10 day
Just a thought, but maybe the devs could only enable that checkbox and
functionality if the user's grid is outside the "antipodal region" where NA
calls are mapped.
> On Dec 19, 2017, at 20:53, Peter Sumner wrote:
>
> Hi Dev team,
>since the inclusion of "NA VHF Contest mode" in WSJT a lo
Hi Dev team,
since the inclusion of "NA VHF Contest mode" in WSJT a lot of VK and I
believe also ZL operators get to see a popup from WSJT-X that wants them to
enable "Contest Mode?". I have spoke directly to many that have
experienced this and a lot of them have just stopped using WSJT-X in fa
Hi !
The "NA VHF contest" mode could be also useful in NAC (Nordig activity
contests [10m to microwaves]) if just 6chr locator could be changed.
I'm afraid that this runs out of bits in message, or could it be
implemented somehow?
--
Saku
OH1KH
3 Jay KA9CFD
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor [mailto:j...@princeton.edu]
Sent: September 22, 2017 17:50
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] NA VHF Contest Mode
Hi Jay, Larry, George, and all,
Revision r8105 is another attempt at eliminating all potential caus
Sent: September 22, 2017 17:50
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] NA VHF Contest Mode
Hi Jay, Larry, George, and all,
Revision r8105 is another attempt at eliminating all potential causes of
confusion when one party has checked NA VHF Contest Mode and the other has
not.
Please
nt <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>>, Steven Franke
mailto:s.j.fra...@icloud.com>>
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] NA VHF Contest Mode
Hi Steve,
On 9/22/2017 8:12 AM, Steven Franke wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Recall that MSK144 is configured such that fix_contest_msg is
*alwa
On 9/21/2017 12:42 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
What would be *really* helpful is for you to work with someone else
and thoroughly exercise the new capabilities. Both MSK144 and FT8.
The idea is that one of you would be trying to make contest QSOs; the
QSO partnet might or might not be in the contest
Hi Jay, Larry, George, and all,
Revision r8105 is another attempt at eliminating all potential causes of
confusion when one party has checked NA VHF Contest Mode and the other
has not.
Please find someone else with whom you can test this feature and report
you results here -- if possible, us
PS: The tests need to be made on a VHF band, 50+ MHz.
On 9/22/2017 1:49 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi Jay, Larry, George, and all,
Revision r8105 is another attempt at eliminating all potential causes of
confusion when one party has checked NA VHF Contest Mode and the other
has not.
Please find
t;
>
>
> Sent from my U.S. Cellular® Smartphone
>
> Original message
> From: Joe Taylor
> Date: 9/22/17 07:16 (GMT-06:00)
> To: WSJT software development , Steven
> Franke
> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] NA VHF Contest Mode
>
> Hi Steve,
>
:
9/22/17 07:16 (GMT-06:00) To: WSJT software development
, Steven Franke
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] NA VHF Contest Mode
Hi Steve,
On 9/22/2017 8:12 AM, Steven Franke wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Recall that MSK144 is configured such that fix_contest_msg is *always*
> called, independent o
: [wsjt-devel] NA VHF Contest Mode
Hi Steve,
On 9/22/2017 8:12 AM, Steven Franke wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Recall that MSK144 is configured such that fix_contest_msg is *always*
> called, independent of whether or not the contest box is checked. Won’t this
> prevent the contest-mode pr
Hi Steve,
On 9/22/2017 8:12 AM, Steven Franke wrote:
Hi Joe,
Recall that MSK144 is configured such that fix_contest_msg is *always* called,
independent of whether or not the contest box is checked. Won’t this prevent
the contest-mode prompt from being triggered in that mode?
Yes, it seems t
Hi Joe,
Recall that MSK144 is configured such that fix_contest_msg is *always* called,
independent of whether or not the contest box is checked. Won’t this prevent
the contest-mode prompt from being triggered in that mode?
Steve k9an
> On Sep 20, 2017, at 7:48 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
>
> Hi a
prompt and the auto sequence did
not advance beyond sending TX1.
73 Jay KA9CFD
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor [mailto:j...@princeton.edu]
Sent: September 20, 2017 19:48
To: WSJT Software Development
Subject: [wsjt-devel] NA VHF Contest Mode
Hi all,
As an experiment, code revision
-
From: Joe Taylor [mailto:j...@princeton.edu]
Sent: September 20, 2017 19:48
To: WSJT Software Development
Subject: [wsjt-devel] NA VHF Contest Mode
Hi all,
As an experiment, code revision r8101 in the WSJT-X development branch
includes several changes to the way *NA VHF Contest Mode* is
> On Sep 21, 2017, at 2:14 PM, James Shaver wrote:
>
> Drop me a note, George, we can find a semi-empty corner of a band :)
Same here, George.
Gary - AG0N
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's
You bet, Joe.
George J Molnar, CEM, CHPP
KF2T - Nevada, USA
> On Sep 21, 2017, at 1:14 PM, James Shaver wrote:
>
> Drop me a note, George, we can find a semi-empty corner of a band :)
>
> Jim S.
>
> N2ADV
>
>
>> On 9/21/2017 4:05 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
>> Hi George,
>>
>>> On 9/21/2017 3:56
Drop me a note, George, we can find a semi-empty corner of a band :)
Jim S.
N2ADV
On 9/21/2017 4:05 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi George,
On 9/21/2017 3:56 PM, George J Molnar wrote:
Joe, would absolutely not remove sh - it’s incredibly useful. My
intention was to say the term should be written
Hi George,
On 9/21/2017 3:56 PM, George J Molnar wrote:
Joe, would absolutely not remove sh - it’s incredibly useful. My intention was
to say the term should be written as a full word (e.g. “Shorthand”), not
deleted.
RR, understood. Can you find someone with whom to do stress tests of
cont
Joe, would absolutely not remove sh - it’s incredibly useful. My intention was
to say the term should be written as a full word (e.g. “Shorthand”), not
deleted.
George J Molnar, CEM, CHPP
KF2T - Nevada, USA
> On Sep 21, 2017, at 12:42 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
>
> Hi George,
>
>> On 9/21/2017 3:
Hi George,
On 9/21/2017 3:31 PM, George J Molnar wrote:
Quick feedback on the repositioned contest mode checkbox. Bravo! Good idea.
Before GA release, it might be helpful to clean up the labels and alignment, so
everything flows smoothly. ”Sh” could be written out, and maybe NA VHF Contest
co
Quick feedback on the repositioned contest mode checkbox. Bravo! Good idea.
Before GA release, it might be helpful to clean up the labels and alignment, so
everything flows smoothly. ”Sh” could be written out, and maybe NA VHF Contest
could distill down to just “Contest.” With appropriate toolt
Ok Joe. Thanks for the explanation.
73 Jay KA9CFD
Sent from my U.S. Cellular® Smartphone
Original message From: Joe Taylor Date:
9/21/17 12:39 (GMT-06:00) To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] NA VHF Contest
Mode
Hi Jay,
On 9/20/2017 5:08 PM, Jay
Hi Jay,
On 9/20/2017 5:08 PM, Jay Hainline wrote:
Joe and all. Curious because I am not a big contester. My understanding is the
reason for the extra coding is for producing the message sent for TX3 with both
calls plus R Grid. If it’s a problem with extra characters involved, why can't
you j
aylor [mailto:j...@princeton.edu]
Sent: September 20, 2017 19:48
To: WSJT Software Development
Subject: [wsjt-devel] NA VHF Contest Mode
Hi all,
As an experiment, code revision r8101 in the WSJT-X development branch includes
several changes to the way *NA VHF Contest Mode* is implemented. The
Hi all,
As an experiment, code revision r8101 in the WSJT-X development branch
includes several changes to the way *NA VHF Contest Mode* is
implemented. The goal is to obviate any cause for confusion (e.g.,
implausible grid squares being diaplayed) when one station uses Contest
Mode and the
35 matches
Mail list logo
