Policy is often dictated by practice. Since there is no FT8 v JT65 dynamic
because mostly everyone on FT8 was on JT65, the trend recently has been to
extend into the JT65 section on crowded bands. It is happening. It is working.
Use just need to use your VFO or open your filters.
Erik.
From:
Hi Black, Gary, Libor, Richard, Eric,
Thank you for your comments to my proposal.
I updated my proposal based on your comments as follow.
-
Please
No way...JT65 is notably more sensitive than FT8. FT8 is a lot of fun right
now as you can make lots of QSOs pretty quickly.
Don't need to "phase out". No big harm in taking the first 500Hz of the band
for JT65 though that I can see. Those bands are only "by practice"...not "by
law".
de Mi
Perhaps it is time to phase out JT65 on HF, in favor of FT8 and JT9. That would
most certainly be best use of spectrum, considering the bandwidths and
efficiency of those modes.
Best regards,
Gary, K7EK
From: Black Michael via wsjt-devel
To: WSJT software development
Cc: Black Michael
Why nobody at 200-400?
Is the 2kHz (or maybe 1kHz) lower available on the busy bands?
Perhaps you could just announce on the wsjt-x list and see if you get any
takers. If you get several DX'ers to joiin you it may work.
de Mike W9MDB
On Tuesday, November 21, 2017, 3:16:42 PM CST, Ri
Mike,
*1)* your issue seems to be one where split working is part of the solution
*2)* you are seeking somehow to constrain *everyone else* for the
benefit of your potential QSO
*3)* in general intra-continental and inter-continental frequencies on
VHF are different, to avoid problems with l
On 21/11/17 19:14, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
> Don't you have any room at 2000-2500? Or is it really so crowded there's no
> space anywhere?
Talking specifically about 80m ...
It's usually possibly to find a slot, although 2000-2500 is often
spoiled by audio harmonics from stations l
Believe us – on 20m, 40m, and in the past week 80m, here in Europe it is packed
solid. There is a gradual drift up into the voids of ex-JT65 space. When you
get the fixed frequency idea out of your head and tune the VFO, it is amazing
what is up there on FT8. ZS8Z was a prime example.
Erik.
F
Don't you have any room at 2000-2500? Or is it really so crowded there's no
space anywhere?
de Mike W9MDB
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.l
Anyone know if there to keep WSJT-X 1.8 from responding to
my calling CQ DX from Local North America Stations inside
WSJT-X or JT-Alert
Trying to do FT8 6 meters and doing multi-hops from North America into
Europe and window for hop is critical
When a Local Station responds to my CQ DX, a Loc
On 21/11/17 16:39, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
> FT8 can also decode overlapping signals fairly well.
Can it? I see little evidence of that. The second-pass decodes appear in
the Band Activity window after the first-pass decodes and my experience
are relatively few in number. And when FT8
Is anybody on JT65 running out of room at 500-2000 offset?Why do we need to
change anything?Yes...SOME rigs can do 3000, many cannot. So if you want to
transmit above 2500 you may be losing a lot of people (including DXpeditions).
Moving the 7.074 to 7.073 means anybody running an older version w
On 21/11/17 16:05, Libor Holouš wrote:
> According this theme I'd like to ask about expanding the band possibility.
> FT8 seems to be very popular these days and there are some DXpeditions
> operating there, so 2 kHz is not enough space for all that traffic. The
> extreme is 40 and 20m, but whe
Hello guys..
According this theme I'd like to ask about expanding the band possibility. FT8
seems to be very popular these days and there are some DXpeditions operating
there, so 2 kHz is not enough space for all that traffic. The extreme is 40 and
20m, but when propagation allows, the other ba
Although FT8 has "intruded" on the lower part of the normal JT65 spot I don't
see it as a problem.There aren't that many JT65's out there...and, in the past,
I've seen plenty of JT65's "intruding" on the JT9 area.It's quite natural to
bump up the 2kHz limit when the band is crowded. ALl has to
On 21/11/2017 06:38 a.m., Rich - K1HTV wrote:
Scott,
Have you tried using the F4 key to clear the current QSO messages then click on
the new station call that you want to work?
Yes, that works. Thanks, Rich. Helps enormously with pileups.
73 all,
Scott Bidstrup
TI3/W7RI
-
I don't recognize this behavior at all, but I have checked the "allow tx
freq changes while transmitting" in the general settings tab, maybe this is
key ?
It at least tells me (in rx freq box and lower left status) it's sending
the new response to the double clicked message, and both have timestamp
Scott,
Have you tried using the F4 key to clear the current QSO messages then click on
the new station call that you want to work?
73,
Rich - K1HTV
sc...@bidstrup.com
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of th
18 matches
Mail list logo
