Re: [wsjt-devel] BUG Report for WSJT-X Ver 2.2.2 - 64 bit

[bergeracb--- via wsjt-devel]

Just downloaded and installed V.2.2.2, made a contact and checked my wsjtx_log 
file.It had the correct (WSJT-X ADIF Export) header. No problem?Al, N4AB,  
73
In a message dated 6/24/2020 15:18:44 Eastern Standard Time, 
g4...@classdesign.com writes:

On 24/06/2020 19:17, Joe WA6AXE wrote:
> I need to report a BUG in the newest ver 2.2.2. (64 bit) ...
>
> When the program MAKES the wsjtx_log.adi file .. There is an ERROR in the
> beginning of the adi file ..
> The current version 2.2.2 writes:
> WSJT-X ADIF Export
> it SHOULD be written as:
> WSJT-X ADIF Export
>
>
> The  is currently shown as 
>
> This is causing some problem when 3rd party BRIDGE programs try to 
> IMPORT the INFO from the adi file ...
> Can we pse correct this?? TIA!!
>
> 73 Joe wa6axe

Hi Joe,

thanks for the issue report. I can confirm this is a defect which is 
only in v2.2.2, it is corrected for the next release. You can work 
around it by editing the wsjtx_log.adi file to correct the end of header 
marker. The header is only written when a new file is created, which 
should only be when a new installation is set up. Sorry for the 
inconvenience.

73
Bill
G4WJS.



___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] BUG Report for WSJT-X Ver 2.2.2 - 64 bit

[Joe WA6AXE]

Thank YOU Bill!!  I have worked around the problem - by making my
WSJT-X BRIDGE to look for either  or  .. That cured the problem
quickly.. Tnx agn Bill!

73 Joe wa6axe


From: Bill Somerville 
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 2:15 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] BUG Report for WSJT-X Ver 2.2.2 - 64 bit

On 24/06/2020 19:17, Joe WA6AXE wrote:
> I need to report a BUG in the newest ver 2.2.2. (64 bit) ...
>
> When the program MAKES the wsjtx_log.adi file .. There is an ERROR in the
> beginning of the adi file ..
> The current version 2.2.2 writes:
> WSJT-X ADIF Export
> it SHOULD be written as:
> WSJT-X ADIF Export
>
>
> The  is currently shown as 
>
> This is causing some problem when 3rd party BRIDGE programs try to
> IMPORT the INFO from the adi file ...
> Can we pse correct this?? TIA!!
>
> 73 Joe wa6axe

Hi Joe,

thanks for the issue report. I can confirm this is a defect which is
only in v2.2.2, it is corrected for the next release. You can work
around it by editing the wsjtx_log.adi file to correct the end of header
marker. The header is only written when a new file is created, which
should only be when a new installation is set up. Sorry for the
inconvenience.

73
Bill
G4WJS.



___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] BUG Report for WSJT-X Ver 2.2.2 - 64 bit

[Bill Somerville]

On 24/06/2020 19:17, Joe WA6AXE wrote:

I need to report a BUG in the newest ver 2.2.2. (64 bit) ...

When the program MAKES the wsjtx_log.adi file .. There is an ERROR in the
beginning of the adi file ..
The current version 2.2.2 writes:
WSJT-X ADIF Export
it SHOULD be written as:
WSJT-X ADIF Export


The  is currently shown as 

This is causing some problem when 3rd party BRIDGE programs try to 
IMPORT the INFO from the adi file ...

Can we pse correct this?? TIA!!

73 Joe wa6axe


Hi Joe,

thanks for the issue report. I can confirm this is a defect which is 
only in v2.2.2, it is corrected for the next release. You can work 
around it by editing the wsjtx_log.adi file to correct the end of header 
marker. The header is only written when a new file is created, which 
should only be when a new installation is set up. Sorry for the 
inconvenience.


73
Bill
G4WJS.



___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

[wsjt-devel] BUG Report for WSJT-X Ver 2.2.2 - 64 bit

[Joe WA6AXE]

I need to report a BUG in the newest ver 2.2.2. (64 bit) ...

When the program MAKES the wsjtx_log.adi file .. There is an ERROR in the
beginning of the adi file ..
The current version 2.2.2 writes:
WSJT-X ADIF Export
it SHOULD be written as:
WSJT-X ADIF Export


The  is currently shown as 

This is causing some problem when 3rd party BRIDGE programs try to IMPORT the 
INFO from the adi file ...
Can we pse correct this?? TIA!!

73 Joe wa6axe

___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Field Day Frequencies

[Gary McDuffie]

> On Jun 23, 2020, at 20:09, Matthew Miller  wrote:
> 
> For ARRL Field Day 2019, I recall there was a different set of frequencies 
> used for FT8.
>  
> Does anyone know if there will be a de-facto set of frequencies to use for 
> Field Day 2020 for FT8, and also for FT4?  Or the default ones?

You should check your log to see what frequency you were on last year.  
Unfortunately, it sounds like the majority of the contest crowd is going to 
ignore the rest of us and take over the normal segments.  Going to be a quiet 
weekend here with the radios turned off.

Gary - AG0N

___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Field Day Frequencies

[rjai...@gmail.com]

You’re correct that ARRL doesn’t suggest any different frequencies for FT8
on field day. ARRL doesn’t suggest any specific frequencies for field day
on any mode, in fact.

Last year, however, a group of hams on a Facebook group suggested that FD
participants use different frequencies so as not to interfere with normal
FT8 traffic. This year they have stated that they will not have a frequency
list because it didn’t work last year.

This year there is also FT4 available which may be better for rapid fire FD
contacts.

73
Ria
N2RJ

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 6:01 AM Neil Zampella  wrote:

> The ARRL has not set any 'different' frequencies for Field Day other than
> the usual no contests on WARC bands and 60 meters.   The standard FT8 & FT4
> frequencies should be used.   You can verify this by going to the ARRL
> website under Field Day rules.
>
> Neil, KN3ILZ
> On 6/23/2020 10:09 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> For ARRL Field Day 2019, I recall there was a different set of frequencies
> used for FT8.
>
>
>
> Does anyone know if there will be a de-facto set of frequencies to use for
> Field Day 2020 for FT8, and also for FT4?  Or the default ones?
>
>
>
> I did a Google search but I didn’t come up with anything recent.
>
>
>
> -Matt / KK4NDE
>
>
>
> 
>  Virus-free.
> www.avg.com
> 
> <#m_7644369794834708075_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> ___
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Field Day Frequencies

[Neil Zampella]

The ARRL has not set any 'different' frequencies for Field Day other
than the usual no contests on WARC bands and 60 meters. The standard FT8
& FT4 frequencies should be used.   You can verify this by going to the
ARRL website under Field Day rules.

Neil, KN3ILZ

On 6/23/2020 10:09 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:


For ARRL Field Day 2019, I recall there was a different set of
frequencies used for FT8.

Does anyone know if there will be a de-facto set of frequencies to use
for Field Day 2020 for FT8, and also for FT4?  Or the default ones?

I did a Google search but I didn’t come up with anything recent.

-Matt / KK4NDE




--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel