Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-devel Digest, Vol 119, Issue 46

2024-01-27 Thread Uwe, DG2YCB via wsjt-devel
The "240202" code will be released on February 2, 2024. 73 de DG2YCB, Uwe German Amateur Radio Station DG2YCB Dr. Uwe Risse eMail: dg2...@gmx.de Info: www.qrz.com/db/DG2YCB Am 27.01.2024 um 14:43 schrieb Black Michael: I don't see the 240202 update at

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-devel Digest, Vol 119, Issue 46

2024-01-27 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
I don't see the 240202 update at your "find it here" link. It points to  https://sourceforge.net/projects/wsjt-x-improved/files/WSJT-X_v2.7.1/ Mike W9MDB On Saturday, January 27, 2024 at 04:14:00 AM CST, Uwe, DG2YCB via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi all, Short information: Although I

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-devel Digest, Vol 119, Issue 46

2024-01-27 Thread Uwe, DG2YCB via wsjt-devel
Yes, but then we also have to remove the <> characters, because otherwise it won't work for compound callsigns. But the following code should do the job. Will be included in "240202". ... &().replace("<","").replace(">","").contains(""+m_baseCall+"") ... 73 de DG2YCB, Uwe

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-devel Digest, Vol 119, Issue 46

2024-01-27 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
Should be able to use this instead.  Your call always has a space before/after. contains(" " + m_baseCall +" ")) Mike W9MDB On Saturday, January 27, 2024 at 04:14:00 AM CST, Uwe, DG2YCB via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi all, Short information: Although I could not reproduce this unwanted

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-devel Digest, Vol 119, Issue 45

2024-01-27 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
Actually CW operators use apriori operation all the time. When you're in a poor signal CW QSO with a dxepedition or such all you listen for is your call sign -- not theirs.  You assume (apriori) that they are the ones responding and you have a sequence you follow so you just continue. Mike

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-devel Digest, Vol 119, Issue 45

2024-01-27 Thread Glenn Williams via wsjt-devel
Reino, Many thanks. I like to have all the background. So I cleared the concern with a fresh TX5S QSO last night. FT8 blasted through all the CW contest. I still got the missing decode in the RX Frequency window, though. --73, Glenn, AF8C On 1/27/2024 1:29 AM, Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-devel Digest, Vol 119, Issue 46

2024-01-27 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
HI Uwe, This should be eliminated, it resulted in several unintended transmissions with the antenna not switched or amp not tuned. I like the fact that you removed it. By the way, with the "240202" update I also plan to deactivate this strange function that pressing the RETURN or ENTER keys

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-devel Digest, Vol 119, Issue 46

2024-01-27 Thread Uwe, DG2YCB via wsjt-devel
Hi all, Short information: Although I could not reproduce this unwanted effect so far, I have now added another line of code as a test for my upcoming 'improved' 2.7.1-devel "240202" update, which has the effect that if you are in FT8 Hound mode, all messages (below 1000 Hz) are really displayed