Re: [wsjt-devel] ARRL Digi contest log converting to Cabrillo

2023-06-05 Thread Gene Marsh via wsjt-devel
You can use ADIF Master as well. A great ADIF tool box app.  It’s free.73 de W8NET Miles “Gene” MarshARRL A1 Operator 3905 Century Club Master #47Hurricane Watch Net member On Jun 5, 2023, at 5:23 AM, Dennis W1UE via wsjt-devel wrote:HannuUse N1mM+.  Setup the contest i nN1mM+, then import the

Re: [wsjt-devel] “Disable Tx after sending 73” not working

2022-07-18 Thread Gene Marsh via wsjt-devel
Reino, if that is the case, why do you need to check the box “Disable Tx after sending”? 73 de W8NET Miles “Gene” Marsh 3905 Century Club Master #47 3905 Century Club 2022 Eyeball host > On Jul 18, 2022, at 3:55 PM, Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel > wrote: > >  >> >> For clarity: I am trying

Re: [wsjt-devel] “Disable Tx after sending 73” not working

2022-07-18 Thread Gene Marsh via wsjt-devel
wsjt-devel >> wrote: >> >> Gene, >> >> Did you click "OK" after clicking "Disable"? The reason I ask is that the >> "Disable" box in your picture is not checked. >> >> 73, >> >> Jim N6VH >> >>>

Re: [wsjt-devel] “Disable Tx after sending 73” not working

2022-07-18 Thread Gene Marsh via wsjt-devel
u click "OK" after clicking "Disable"? The reason I ask is that the > "Disable" box in your picture is not checked. > > 73, > > Jim N6VH > >> On 7/16/2022 7:12 AM, Gene Marsh via wsjt-devel wrote: >> Hi all, >> My setup: >> Wind

Re: [wsjt-devel] Question, FT8

2021-10-03 Thread Gene Marsh via wsjt-devel
Allen and Andy, Yes, it is not required. However, many stations (especially fox and hound) MUST receive a 73 to acknowledge a contact for a card. 73 de W8NET Miles “Gene” Marsh > On Oct 3, 2021, at 7:20 PM, Allan Downie via wsjt-devel > wrote: > >  Hi Andy...Yes it happens all the

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X/IC-7300 Power Issue

2019-08-19 Thread Gene Marsh via wsjt-devel
I had the same issue before. Check your Windows 10 sound “USB Mic Codec” level. And, in your 7300 mod level needs to be 35-50% or less. 73 de W8NET Miles / “Gene” Secretary, Portage County Amateur Radio Service (PCARS) 3905 Century Club - Master #47 DV2/W8NET in the Philippines Licensed since

[wsjt-devel] SUGGESTION: Display or not, confirmed QSOs

2019-07-30 Thread Gene Marsh via wsjt-devel
Joe (and the team), First, the last (new) rev of WSJT-X is WAY FASTER to decode a busy band. THANK YOU! My suggestion: Because I made thousands of FT8 contacts (especially on 20m, 30m and 40m), a huge amount of the CQ decodes on a busy band are GREEN (confirmed QSO for call/band/etc). Even

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT4 Frequency on 40-m

2019-07-28 Thread Gene Marsh via wsjt-devel
Hi Steve, I didn’t calculate everything - and thank you for doing “my work” for me. ;) In the real world, we need more empirical data to support my thought = FT8 is superior for weak signal/DX/“valuable” contacts (and, of course, “value” is purely subjective). We know is “better”

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT4 Frequency on 40-m

2019-07-27 Thread Gene Marsh via wsjt-devel
No! FT8 is WAY MORE sensitive! (~8db) FT4 is awesome for MORE contacts (i.e. contests). I’m sticking with FT8 for QUALITY. 73 de W8NET Miles / “Gene” Secretary, Portage County Amateur Radio Service (PCARS) 3905 Century Club - Master #47 DV2/W8NET in the Philippines Licensed since 1974 > On

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bug report: WSJT-X fails to output sound after several minutes idle

2019-06-15 Thread Gene Marsh via wsjt-devel
Check your Windows 10 updates first. I had the same issue. Now, no problem. 73 de W8NET Miles / “Gene” Secretary, Portage County Amateur Radio Service (PCARS) 3905 Century Club - Master #47 DV2/W8NET in the Philippines Licensed since 1974 > On Jun 15, 2019, at 6:41 PM, Tom M0LTE wrote: > >

[wsjt-devel] Mock contest observations

2019-06-04 Thread Gene Marsh via wsjt-devel
Joe, Ramblings from Kent, Ohio: - as this was a “mock contest”, I think was a: 1) good indication of functionality, and 2) not a good indicator of contest conditions. Because we had a small sample of stations for “congestion” in a contest, we need more real life contest conditions.

[wsjt-devel] Broken “good” QSO?

2019-06-04 Thread Gene Marsh via wsjt-devel
Ok I called IZ0CUV He responded with -13 I didn’t decode his report He didn’t hear his response His next transmission I heard was his CQ - and was GREEN. No 73 or RR73. No log entry. ??? 73 de W8NET Miles / “Gene” Secretary, Portage County Amateur Radio Service (PCARS) 3905 Century

Re: [wsjt-devel] Observation on decoding

2019-06-04 Thread Gene Marsh via wsjt-devel
ote: > > Gene -- > > Remember that release candidates are intended for test purposes. When > running any -rc# version, you should always run with "Save All" selected. > It's easy enough to delete all those unwanted files, later. > >-- Joe, K1JT > >>

Re: [wsjt-devel] Observation on decoding

2019-06-04 Thread Gene Marsh via wsjt-devel
> On Jun 4, 2019, at 12:46 PM, Black Michael wrote: > > I do believe 63% audio on the IC7300 is wayy too much audio. What does > your ALC meter say? > > de Mike W9MDB > > > > > On Tuesday, June 4, 2019, 11:44:04 AM CDT, Gene Marsh via wsjt-devel >

Re: [wsjt-devel] Error in Sound Output Message

2019-04-06 Thread Gene Marsh via wsjt-devel
Check your Device Mangler for your sound card. It’s working? 73 de W8NET Miles / “Gene” Secretary, Portage County Amateur Radio Service (PCARS) 3905 Century Club - Master #47 Licensed since 1974 > On Apr 6, 2019, at 10:37 AM, Richard Solomon wrote: > > One more thing I noticed. The waterfall

Re: [wsjt-devel] Someone released an Auto CQ mod - my 2 cents

2019-04-03 Thread Gene Marsh via wsjt-devel
.-. .-. ... as a massive stroke survivor (7/25/14). Keep pounding away! 73 de W8NET Miles / “Gene” Secretary, Portage County Amateur Radio Service (PCARS) 3905 Century Club - Master #47 Licensed since 1974 > On Apr 3, 2019, at 6:10 PM, Topher Petty wrote: > > Jari: > > Just keep doing

Re: [wsjt-devel] F/H demo at local hamfest

2019-01-02 Thread Gene Marsh via wsjt-devel
That’s BRILLIANT! 73 de W8NET Miles / “Gene” Secretary, Portage County Amateur Radio Service (PCARS) > On Jan 2, 2019, at 9:22 PM, Gary Hinson wrote: > > Hi George, > > Another approach is to use AUDIO instead of RF for your demo. No radios > needed, just laptops. Deliberately route the