Re: [wsjt-devel] Flex hamlib crash

2019-02-07 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
I can reproduce this problem.  This appears to be a bug in SmartSDR.  When sending TX, then RX with transmit inhibited SmartSDR has a long delay in responding causing a timeout. This sequence using rigctld-wsjtx with TX Inhibit causes the Flex to respond slowly at the "T 0" command.It appears

Re: [wsjt-devel] Flex hamlib crash

2019-02-07 Thread Stephen Hicks
Mike, See below -- On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 8:24 AM Black Michael wrote: > We will get the Flex to behave with TCP/IP -- give me a couple of days > since we now have a way to duplicate the problem. > Much appreciated! > > Trying to modify WSJT-X to use multiple slices would be non-trivial to

Re: [wsjt-devel] Flex hamlib crash

2019-02-07 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
We will get the Flex to behave with TCP/IP -- give me a couple of days since we now have a way to duplicate the problem. Trying to modify WSJT-X to use multiple slices would be non-trivial to say the least.   The easy way would be if one could just present a 5kHz*8 audio channel and just expand

Re: [wsjt-devel] Flex hamlib crash

2019-02-07 Thread Bill Somerville
On 07/02/2019 11:56, Stephen Hicks wrote: Good Morning — I’m not sure if it’s the right thing to do, but we generally just tell our customers to use TS-2000 for the rig setting in WSJT because the FLEX setting has been unreliable.  Our CAT protocol is modeled after the Kenwood command set so

Re: [wsjt-devel] Flex hamlib crash

2019-02-07 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
Yeah...Al is a beta tester for Flex so perhaps ask them about this.  We just have to get enough information to give Flex something to work with. My other Flex user that I'm working with sees this same network_flush loop but it only happens to him once every couple of hours.  So it may be a

Re: [wsjt-devel] Flex hamlib crash

2019-02-07 Thread Stephen Hicks
Good Morning — I’m not sure if it’s the right thing to do, but we generally just tell our customers to use TS-2000 for the rig setting in WSJT because the FLEX setting has been unreliable. Our CAT protocol is modeled after the Kenwood command set so this seemed like a logical recommendation and

Re: [wsjt-devel] Flex hamlib crash

2019-02-07 Thread Bill Somerville
On 07/02/2019 04:36, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: There's actually another problem going on. I worked with Al a bit this afternoon using rigctld. Al is the 2nd person I'm working with on the same problemafter this sequence hamlib just loops around the network_flush() routine and

Re: [wsjt-devel] Flex hamlib crash

2019-02-06 Thread Bill Somerville
On 06/02/2019 20:51, Al wrote: This is from the SSDR CAT log  for the TCP port leading up to the event with TX inhibited.. 19-02-06 14:28:05.123 TCP 26001 [sent]: ZZFI01; 2019-02-06 14:28:05.123 TCP 26001 [rcvd]: IF; 2019-02-06 14:28:05.125 TCP 26001 [sent]:

[wsjt-devel] Flex hamlib crash

2019-02-06 Thread Al
This has been reported before ...  Maybe you've already fixed it; If WSJT-X is configured to use the FlexRadio 6xxx rig interface method then at random intervals WSJT-X will cease to function correctly. Various different features cease to work each time and the CPU usage will increase to about