Re: [wsjt-devel] Hamlib Beta Testing Group needed

2023-05-13 Thread Dennis W1UE via wsjt-devel
George What operating system are you using? Since you're the first with a 7610, I"d like to include you as a tester. Dennis W1UE On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 5:01 PM WB5JJJ via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > This also affected the IC-7610, but the new file fixed the

Re: [wsjt-devel] Hamlib Beta Testing Group needed

2023-05-13 Thread WB5JJJ via wsjt-devel
This also affected the IC-7610, but the new file fixed the problem. 73's George - WB5JJJ HoIP - 100105 On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 3:29 AM Tom M0LTE via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hey Uwe > > While manual testing could probably never be eliminated in the case of >

Re: [wsjt-devel] Hamlib Beta Testing Group needed

2023-05-13 Thread Adrian via wsjt-devel
I agree on Uwes position over '''Rejnos, certainty... On 13/5/23 22:59, Tom M0LTE via wsjt-devel wrote: Hey Reino I fully understand your concerns. Clearly this idea has been considered. Conceptually I believe a slightly different approach might overcome some of those difficulties, however I

Re: [wsjt-devel] Hamlib Beta Testing Group needed

2023-05-13 Thread Tom M0LTE via wsjt-devel
Hey Reino I fully understand your concerns. Clearly this idea has been considered. Conceptually I believe a slightly different approach might overcome some of those difficulties, however I am conscious of derailing Uwe’s thread, so I won’t. Uwe, good luck with the search. Best wishes Tom On

Re: [wsjt-devel] Hamlib Beta Testing Group needed

2023-05-13 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
I have been writing simulators but they do not have the nuances that the rigs do.  There's all sorts of oddities. Butthe plan is to eventually incorporate those simulators in the "make test" in Hamlib that should catch big mistakes. It's on my to-do list but don't hold your breath...it's a

Re: [wsjt-devel] Hamlib Beta Testing Group needed

2023-05-13 Thread Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel
> From: Tom M0LTE via wsjt-devel [mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net] > Sent: lauantai 13. toukokuuta 2023 10.58 >While manual testing could probably never be eliminated in the case of hamlib, >has there been any consideration of creating test harnesses to remove/reduce >the need for

Re: [wsjt-devel] Hamlib Beta Testing Group needed

2023-05-13 Thread Tom M0LTE via wsjt-devel
Hey Uwe While manual testing could probably never be eliminated in the case of hamlib, has there been any consideration of creating test harnesses to remove/reduce the need for manual testing? It strikes me that there could be potential to capture test cases from manual testing with real rigs,

[wsjt-devel] Hamlib Beta Testing Group needed

2023-05-13 Thread Uwe, DG2YCB via wsjt-devel
Dear WSJT-X users, Please allow me to summarize again here on this email reflector a topic that is very important to me and to all of us. My original post was on https://groups.io/g/wsjtgroup, so maybe it's best if you join the discussion there. Despite great personal commitment of the hamlib