On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 3:09 PM, klaas.holwerda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Labenski wrote:
>>> obj = iter3:op_mul()
>>
>> This should error out since op_mul() expects an argument.
>
> No it really works. And operator*() generates things different compared too
> operator*( const a2dAffineMa
John Labenski wrote:
>> obj = iter3:op_mul()
>
> This should error out since op_mul() expects an argument.
No it really works. And operator*() generates things different compared too
operator*( const a2dAffineMatrix& m )
Which is what i need, only the naming i don't like.
>
>> If possible addi
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 5:49 PM, klaas.holwerda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Labenski wrote:
>> I will look into the adding both pre and post increment/decrement
>> operators however.
>>
> All the better.
Should work now.
op_inc/dec are for post inc/decrementing and op_preinc/dec are for
pre
John Labenski wrote:
> I will look into the adding both pre and post increment/decrement
> operators however.
>
>
All the better.
And if its not asking to much, i would be great if you could distinguish
between *() and *( arg).
As i said, to dereference, i now need to use op_mul, which looks a
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:45 PM, klaas.holwerda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> klaas.holwerda wrote:
>>
> It looks like this post inc solved itself, i out commented it in my
> binding files, and things still work.
> So it seems STL does not really need this operator after all.
> I think i am getting
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 3:57 PM, klaas.holwerda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Labenski wrote:
>> I changed it so that it does not create a "new" instance of the
>> returned pointer and try to run the copy constructor on it, but rather
>> it just pushes the pointer to the object into Lua. This m
klaas.holwerda wrote:
> John Labenski wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 1:05 PM, klaas.holwerda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi John,
>>>
>>> %operator a2dCanvasObjectListIter& operator--(int)
>>>
>>> If you change it to generate this, down here, it will work:
>>>
>>> *returns =
> By the way, have you found a link that exhaustively goes through the
> C++ code for each operator? I can only find lists of the operators or
> discussions about particular cases, but there's always some nuances
> that aren't discussed.
>
Via:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operators_in_C_and_C
John Labenski wrote:
> I changed it so that it does not create a "new" instance of the
> returned pointer and try to run the copy constructor on it, but rather
> it just pushes the pointer to the object into Lua. This means that the
> object must exist for the life of any Lua calls to it.
>
> Hope
John Labenski wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 1:05 PM, klaas.holwerda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Hi John,
>>
>> %operator a2dCanvasObjectListIter& operator--(int)
>>
>> If you change it to generate this, down here, it will work:
>>
>> *returns = ((*self).operator++(arg1));
>
> I don't think
John Labenski wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 1:05 PM, klaas.holwerda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi John,
%operator a2dCanvasObjectListIter& operator--(int)
If you change it to generate this, down here, it will work:
*returns = ((*self).operator++(arg1));
I don't think that post-incrementin
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 1:05 PM, klaas.holwerda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> %operator a2dCanvasObjectListIter& operator--(int)
>
> If you change it to generate this, down here, it will work:
>
> *returns = ((*self).operator++(arg1));
I don't think that post-incrementing makes much s
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 10:52 AM, klaas.holwerda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> The index operator almost works.
> The line:
>a2dLayerInfo* returns = new a2dLayerInfo((*self)[(indx)]);
> should become this:
>a2dLayerInfo* returns = new a2dLayerInfo(*(*self)[(indx)]);
>
> The copy
Hi John,
The index operator almost works.
The line:
a2dLayerInfo* returns = new a2dLayerInfo((*self)[(indx)]);
should become this:
a2dLayerInfo* returns = new a2dLayerInfo(*(*self)[(indx)]);
The copy constructor needs a reference, while my inde operator return a
pointer.
If it would retu
Hi John,
%operator a2dCanvasObjectListIter& operator--(int)
If you change it to generate this, down here, it will work:
*returns = ((*self).operator++(arg1));
Found in your interesting link
http://www.acm.org/crossroads/xrds2-1/ovp.html
static wxLuaArgType
s_wxluatypeArray_wxLua_a2d
Hi John,
> Humm, I hadn't thought about adding the typecasting operators. The Lua
> syntax might be a little weird for this though, "obj:op_double()",
> maybe it might make more sense to add a more readable function
> obj:GetAsDouble() or something.
>
Note that if you choose GetAsDouble then
ob
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Klaas Holwerda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> This first few wrap fine.
>
> %operator a2dDoMu& operator=( const a2dDoMu& );
> %operator a2dDoMu& operator=( const wxChar* );
> %operator a2dDoMu& operator=( double );
> %operator int operat
Hi John,
This first few wrap fine.
%operator a2dDoMu& operator=( const a2dDoMu& );
%operator a2dDoMu& operator=( const wxChar* );
%operator a2dDoMu& operator=( double );
%operator int operator==( const a2dDoMu& ) const;
%operator int operator!=( const a2dDoMu& ) const;
But
18 matches
Mail list logo
