> On 12 Apr 2018, at 08:32, George Dunlap wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Apr 12, 2018, at 2:18 AM, Chao Gao wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 05:10:40PM +, Lars Kurth wrote:
>>> ## Longer Term - Agreed to Pause
>>>
>>> ### [PATCH v4 00/28] add vIOMMU support with irq remapping function of
>>> #
> On Apr 12, 2018, at 2:18 AM, Chao Gao wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 05:10:40PM +, Lars Kurth wrote:
>> ## Longer Term - Agreed to Pause
>>
>> ### [PATCH v4 00/28] add vIOMMU support with irq remapping function of
>> ### virtual VT-d
>>
>> Sent in for meeting agenda by George
>> v3
; Jan Beulich'
; xen-devel ; Brian Woods
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] X86 Community Call: Wed March 14, 15:00 - 16:00 UTC -
Meeting Minutes
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 05:10:40PM +, Lars Kurth wrote:
>## Longer Term - Agreed to Pause
>
>### [PATCH v4 00/28] add vIOMMU support with
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 05:10:40PM +, Lars Kurth wrote:
>## Longer Term - Agreed to Pause
>
>### [PATCH v4 00/28] add vIOMMU support with irq remapping function of
>### virtual VT-d
>
>Sent in for meeting agenda by George
>v3 posted by Lan Tianyu on 22 September 2017: marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=
On 04/11/2018 08:10 PM, Lars Kurth wrote:
> ### [PATCH RFC 00/14] EPT-Based Sub-page Write Protection Support
>
> ### (Zhang Yi)
>
> RFC posted by Zhang Yi Oct 19, 2017
> https://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=
> https://xen.markmail.org/thread/m75h6b2aiwk5h7fx
>
>
> No acks, reviews only by memacce
> From: Lars Kurth
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 2:07 AM
>
>
> ## [PATCH RFC 00/10] x86 passthrough code cleanup
>
> ## Sent in for meeting agenda by Wei
>
> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2018-
> 02/msg01939.html
> Wei wanted to get the maintainers opinions on what is
On 15/03/18 13:48, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Lars Kurth wrote:
>> ## Meeting format
>>
>> Andy: no suggestions to change
>> Lars: the only issue I noticed that we had people
>> Video conference: do this as needed (most conference services have
>> reasonably worming
>
On 03/15/2018 02:54 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.03.18 at 14:48, wrote:
>> Advantages of IRC:
>> - No "talking over" each other: two people can type at the same time,
>> and it's naturally separated into different chunks
>> - Easier to understand different accensts
>>
>> Disadvantages of IRC:
On 15/03/2018, 15:04, "Juergen Gross" wrote:
On 15/03/18 14:48, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Lars Kurth wrote:
>> ## Meeting format
>>
>> Andy: no suggestions to change
>> Lars: the only issue I noticed that we had people
>> Video confere
>>> On 15.03.18 at 14:48, wrote:
> Advantages of IRC:
> - No "talking over" each other: two people can type at the same time,
> and it's naturally separated into different chunks
> - Easier to understand different accensts
>
> Disadvantages of IRC:
> - Have to type reasonably quickly
> - "Anythin
On 15/03/18 14:48, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Lars Kurth wrote:
>> ## Meeting format
>>
>> Andy: no suggestions to change
>> Lars: the only issue I noticed that we had people
>> Video conference: do this as needed (most conference services have
>> reasonably worming
>
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Lars Kurth wrote:
> ## Meeting format
>
> Andy: no suggestions to change
> Lars: the only issue I noticed that we had people
> Video conference: do this as needed (most conference services have reasonably
> worming
> html5)
One thing I want to toss out there -- w
>>> On 15.03.18 at 12:15, wrote:
> Obviously any 41-patch series is going to take some time to get your head
> around, and so it makes sense to schedule that for a time when you have a few
> hours to set aside and nothing urgent. But in any case you don’t need to do
> a detailed review, just g
> On Mar 15, 2018, at 8:31 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
On 14.03.18 at 19:06, wrote:
>> # General Items: RFCs
>>
>> Jan: Generally reviewers prioritize RFCs lower than other non-RFC patch
>> series.
>
> Just to clarify - this was not "reviewers" but "I". I can't speak for
> others.
Well t
>>> On 14.03.18 at 19:06, wrote:
> # General Items: RFCs
>
> Jan: Generally reviewers prioritize RFCs lower than other non-RFC patch
> series.
Just to clarify - this was not "reviewers" but "I". I can't speak for
others.
Jan
___
Xen-devel mailing l
Hi all,
Please find attached the agenda
We don’t have any design and problem related items this meeting. This means
that we will only cover discussions specific to some series, some may contain
design related discussion though. Note that the meeting will probably not be
very interesting for pe
Hi all,
this is my first go at the agenda.
See
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1n7HAu5IbuRt5aJbQKt5X470kv2Ubvk5P2mG0vp6rKfU/edit?usp=sharing
and attached PDF
Text without tables below
As I didn't get a priority order, nor design stuff, but a few series to discuss
I sorted by what looked s
bject: Re: [Xen-devel] X86 Community Call: Wed March 14, 15:00 - 16:00 UTC
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Lars Kurth wrote:
>
>
> On 07/03/2018, 17:02, "George Dunlap" wrote:
>
> >> * Title of series
> >>
> >> * Link to series (e.g
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Lars Kurth wrote:
>
>
> On 07/03/2018, 17:02, "George Dunlap" wrote:
>
> >> * Title of series
> >>
> >> * Link to series (e.g. on
> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel,
> >> markmail, …)
> >>
> >> * Number of outstanding A
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 03:44:22PM +, Lars Kurth wrote:
>
> A2) Long-term, Larger series
>
>
>
> Please call out any x86 related series, that need attention in the longer
> term.
> Provide
>
> * Title of series
>
> * Link to series (e.g. on
> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/
On 07/03/2018, 17:02, "George Dunlap" wrote:
>> * Title of series
>>
>> * Link to series (e.g. on
https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel,
>> markmail, …)
>>
>> * Number of outstanding ACKs (and by whom), number of ACKs
>
>I assume you're sugge
On 03/07/2018 03:44 PM, Lars Kurth wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> please find attached
> a) Meeting details (attached meeting invite)
> b) Bridge details
> c) Call for agenda items
>
> I will collate input and send out a complete agenda, Monday the 12th.
>
>
> Depending on volume of agenda requests, I ma
Hi all,
please find attached
a) Meeting details (attached meeting invite)
b) Bridge details
c) Call for agenda items
I will collate input and send out a complete agenda, Monday the 12th.
Depending on volume of agenda requests, I may have to limit agenda items per
person/vendor. Please be th
23 matches
Mail list logo
