Wolfgang Grandegger kirjoitti:
On 10/11/2005 05:11 PM Fillod Stephane wrote:
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
[..]
Probably, but there are less than awesome 4xx boards around and I'd
guess they might even be more likely targets than G4 based machines,
for
example. Some tuning might be needed.
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
On 10/11/2005 05:11 PM Fillod Stephane wrote:
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
[..]
Probably, but there are less than awesome 4xx boards around and I'd
guess they might even be more likely targets than G4 based machines,
for
example. Some tuning might be needed.
How
On 10/12/2005 02:51 PM Heikki Lindholm wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger kirjoitti:
On 10/11/2005 05:11 PM Fillod Stephane wrote:
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
[..]
Probably, but there are less than awesome 4xx boards around and I'd
guess they might even be more likely targets than G4 based machines,
for
On 10/12/2005 03:16 PM Fillod Stephane wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
On 10/11/2005 05:11 PM Fillod Stephane wrote:
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
[..]
Probably, but there are less than awesome 4xx boards around and I'd
guess they might even be more likely targets than G4 based machines,
for
Wolfgang Grandegger kirjoitti:
What's the problem with Ebonys? I remember running at least 2.6.9 on
Ebonys (440GP) and Walnuts (405).
We have linux-2.4.14-rc3 running on all AMCC eval boards (see
http://www.denx.de). But the kernel supported by RTAI/Fusion,
linuxppc-2.6.10rc3, does not boot
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
The old calibration value was from some ancient ppc32 embedded board,
I
guess. This reflects the awesome power of them ppc64 boxen better :)
Actually, the ppc32 calibration value was from some ancient x86 machine,
I
guess. The same patch could be applied to
Fillod Stephane kirjoitti:
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
The old calibration value was from some ancient ppc32 embedded board,
I
guess. This reflects the awesome power of them ppc64 boxen better :)
Actually, the ppc32 calibration value was from some ancient x86 machine,
Damn, that has been
Fillod Stephane kirjoitti:
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
[..]
Probably, but there are less than awesome 4xx boards around and I'd
guess they might even be more likely targets than G4 based machines,
for
example. Some tuning might be needed.
How many people are using Xenomai (or Fusion) on 4xx
On 10/11/2005 05:11 PM Fillod Stephane wrote:
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
[..]
Probably, but there are less than awesome 4xx boards around and I'd
guess they might even be more likely targets than G4 based machines,
for
example. Some tuning might be needed.
How many people are using Xenomai
