Heikki Lindholm wrote:
> Btw. Do you think the Task/Patch/Tech Support Managers are worth using?
> If not, can the unused(/-ful) ones be disabled from the site?
We will wait for the web site to sort this out.
--
Gilles Chanteperdrix.
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
> Btw. Do you think the Task/Patch/Tech Support Managers are worth using?
The patch manager may be useful, it avoids loosing patches. For the
rest, I have no opinion, maybe someone else?
--
Gilles Chanteperdrix.
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
> Looks good, doesn't place too much burden on the user. One might
> consider adding "details of the hardware platform used
> (CPU/chipset/etc)" or similar, because that isn't necessarily obvious
> from the configs.
Done, thanks.
--
Gilles Chanteperdrix kirjoitti:
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix kirjoitti:
> > Heikki Lindholm wrote:
> > > There's the "if". What I've seen on sourceforge is that often times bugs
> > > that are reported on the ml don't appear in the tracker and vice versa,
> > > although
Gilles Chanteperdrix kirjoitti:
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix kirjoitti:
> > Heikki Lindholm wrote:
> > > There's the "if". What I've seen on sourceforge is that often times bugs
> > > that are reported on the ml don't appear in the tracker and vice versa,
> > > although
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix kirjoitti:
> > Heikki Lindholm wrote:
> > > There's the "if". What I've seen on sourceforge is that often times
> > bugs
> > > that are reported on the ml don't appear in the tracker and vice versa,
> > > although the tracker can probably be
Gilles Chanteperdrix kirjoitti:
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
> There's the "if". What I've seen on sourceforge is that often times bugs
> that are reported on the ml don't appear in the tracker and vice versa,
> although the tracker can probably be configured to forward reports to
> ml, or? Who
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
> There's the "if". What I've seen on sourceforge is that often times bugs
> that are reported on the ml don't appear in the tracker and vice versa,
> although the tracker can probably be configured to forward reports to
> ml, or? Who will type the ml-only reports to t
Gilles Chanteperdrix kirjoitti:
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix kirjoitti:
> > Hi,
> >
> > GNA offers a bug tracking system which is undoubtely a useful tool
> > for lots of projects. What about using it for the Xenomai project ?
>
> It's more difficult to follow/search tw
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix kirjoitti:
> > Hi,
> >
> > GNA offers a bug tracking system which is undoubtely a useful tool
> > for lots of projects. What about using it for the Xenomai project ?
>
> I'm not stronly opposing, but in my opinion it causes information to
> s
> I'm not stronly opposing, but in my opinion it causes
> information to scatter in contrast to the ml. There'll be bug
> reports on the ml regardless of having or not having a bug
> tracking system in function. It's more difficult to
> follow/search two places than one. And this project isn't the
Gilles Chanteperdrix kirjoitti:
Hi,
GNA offers a bug tracking system which is undoubtely a useful tool
for lots of projects. What about using it for the Xenomai project ?
I'm not stronly opposing, but in my opinion it causes information to
scatter in contrast to the ml. There'll be bug report
Hi,
GNA offers a bug tracking system which is undoubtely a useful tool
for lots of projects. What about using it for the Xenomai project ?
The bug submission form is here:
https://gna.org/bugs/?func=additem&group=xenomai
I just had a look at its configuration, here is how it could be
configured
13 matches
Mail list logo
