Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
While we are at it,
#define current ipipe_safe_current() /* ? */
Nope, there is the need for some special changes.
If you refer to the cache flushing issue, then it would be better to
actually check for fo
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> While we are at it,
>>> #define current ipipe_safe_current() /* ? */
>>
>>
>> Nope, there is the need for some special changes.
>>
>
> If you refer to the cache flushing issue, then it would be better to
> actually check for fo
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Hi Jan,
Based on your previous work, here is a set of patches coupling KGDB
and
the I-pipe. Basically, I've attempted to shrink the extra patches
needed
against t
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>
>>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> Based on your previous work, here is a set of patches coupling KGDB
> and
> the I-pipe. Basically, I've attempted to shrink the extr
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Hi Jan,
Based on your previous work, here is a set of patches coupling KGDB and
the I-pipe. Basically, I've attempted to shrink the extra patches needed
against the original KGDB + I-pipe ones to the bare mini
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jan,
>>>
>>> Based on your previous work, here is a set of patches coupling KGDB and
>>> the I-pipe. Basically, I've attempted to shrink the extra patches needed
>>> against the original KGDB + I-pipe ones to the bare mini
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Hi Jan,
Based on your previous work, here is a set of patches coupling KGDB and
the I-pipe. Basically, I've attempted to shrink the extra patches needed
against the original KGDB + I-pipe ones to the bare minimum. This has
been obtained by having the I-p
Philippe Gerum wrote:
>
> Hi Jan,
>
> Based on your previous work, here is a set of patches coupling KGDB and
> the I-pipe. Basically, I've attempted to shrink the extra patches needed
> against the original KGDB + I-pipe ones to the bare minimum. This has
> been obtained by having the I-pipe pro