[Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] kgdb/x86 over I-pipe

2006-06-15 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: While we are at it, #define current ipipe_safe_current() /* ? */ Nope, there is the need for some special changes. If you refer to the cache flushing issue, then it would be better to actually check for fo

[Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] kgdb/x86 over I-pipe

2006-06-15 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe Gerum wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Philippe Gerum wrote: >>> While we are at it, >>> #define current ipipe_safe_current() /* ? */ >> >> >> Nope, there is the need for some special changes. >> > > If you refer to the cache flushing issue, then it would be better to > actually check for fo

[Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] kgdb/x86 over I-pipe

2006-06-12 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Hi Jan, Based on your previous work, here is a set of patches coupling KGDB and the I-pipe. Basically, I've attempted to shrink the extra patches needed against t

[Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] kgdb/x86 over I-pipe

2006-06-12 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe Gerum wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Philippe Gerum wrote: >> >>> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> Philippe Gerum wrote: > Hi Jan, > > Based on your previous work, here is a set of patches coupling KGDB > and > the I-pipe. Basically, I've attempted to shrink the extr

[Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] kgdb/x86 over I-pipe

2006-06-12 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Hi Jan, Based on your previous work, here is a set of patches coupling KGDB and the I-pipe. Basically, I've attempted to shrink the extra patches needed against the original KGDB + I-pipe ones to the bare mini

[Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] kgdb/x86 over I-pipe

2006-06-10 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe Gerum wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Philippe Gerum wrote: >> >>> Hi Jan, >>> >>> Based on your previous work, here is a set of patches coupling KGDB and >>> the I-pipe. Basically, I've attempted to shrink the extra patches needed >>> against the original KGDB + I-pipe ones to the bare mini

[Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] kgdb/x86 over I-pipe

2006-06-08 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Hi Jan, Based on your previous work, here is a set of patches coupling KGDB and the I-pipe. Basically, I've attempted to shrink the extra patches needed against the original KGDB + I-pipe ones to the bare minimum. This has been obtained by having the I-p

[Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] kgdb/x86 over I-pipe

2006-06-07 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe Gerum wrote: > > Hi Jan, > > Based on your previous work, here is a set of patches coupling KGDB and > the I-pipe. Basically, I've attempted to shrink the extra patches needed > against the original KGDB + I-pipe ones to the bare minimum. This has > been obtained by having the I-pipe pro