[Xenomai-core] vxworks-skin taskSpawn

2006-02-24 Thread Roderik_Wildenburg
I am using xenomai-2.1-rc2 and try to create a task via the vxWorks skin function taskSpawn. As I have read that uvm and vxWorks exclude each other, I just inserted the xeno_uvm module (not the xeno_vxworks.o module ). No problems so far. When I start my application nothing happens (no errormess

[Xenomai-core] [arm/hal.c] possible problem (and a PIC-related observation in vanilla Linux)

2006-02-24 Thread Dmitry Adamushko
Hello everybody, 1) arm/hal.c : rthal_irq_enable/disable/end() the only arch that calls Linux'es enable_irq() and disable_irq() directly. The later ones use spinlock with the interrupts off only for the Linux domain, so that under some circumstances - Linux domain gets preempted being i

Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai patch packaging concerns

2006-02-24 Thread Romain Lenglet
Hi Philippe, I figured out where to link/copy every file. There was no need to modify any file in ksrc/... Here is my patch. The new option to prepare-kernel.sh is: --outpatch= For instance you can run: > mkdir /tmp/temptree > ./scripts/prepare-kernel.sh --outpatch=/tmp/patch.diff /tmp/tempt

AW: [Xenomai-core] vxworks-skin taskSpawn (additional info)

2006-02-24 Thread Roderik_Wildenburg
Some more debugging (printf´s ;-)) of the example satch.c revealed that taskSpawn hangs in a function of the nucleus module nucleus/pod.c called xnpod_schedule. This is the caller stack : vxworks/tasklib.c/taskSpawn ->vxworks/tasklib.c/taskInit ->vxworks/tasklib.c/TaskActivate -->nucleus/pod.c

[Xenomai-core] skin libs, libtool warnings, and -module

2006-02-24 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi Philippe, I noticed you fixed the libtool warning during xenomai build - by linking the testsuite statically... :-/ This is just a workaround and doesn't help external users. Isn't the reason for this warnings that "-module" in every skin Makefile.am? At least, removing it also fixes external

[Xenomai-core] Re: skin libs, libtool warnings, and -module

2006-02-24 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi Philippe, I noticed you fixed the libtool warning during xenomai build - by linking the testsuite statically... :-/ This is just a workaround and doesn't help external users. Yes, it's clearly hacky-patchy, however, I don't see how this would impact external users (yet)?

[Xenomai-core] Re: skin libs, libtool warnings, and -module

2006-02-24 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe Gerum wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Hi Philippe, >> >> I noticed you fixed the libtool warning during xenomai build - by >> linking the testsuite statically... :-/ This is just a workaround and >> doesn't help external users. > > Yes, it's clearly hacky-patchy, however, I don't see how th

Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai patch packaging concerns

2006-02-24 Thread Romain Lenglet
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Romain Lenglet wrote: > > +while read f; do > > +f=`echo $f | cut -d/ -f2-` > > +d=`dirname $f` > > +if test "x$output_patch" = "x"; then > > +mkdir -p $linux_tree/$link_dir/$d && \ > > +

[Xenomai-core] Re: [Xenomai-help] Geode performance (Was: problems solved)

2006-02-24 Thread Jim Cromie
Jim Cromie wrote: attached is an update to xeno-test which runs latency with -t0 -t1 -t2 I think Ive got xeno-test and xeno-test.in sync'd, that doesnt seem to happen as part of the configure make process for me. this ones slightly improved, it greps XENO out of /proc/config.gz if its there.