On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 19:31, Gilles Chanteperdrix
wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> full of energy after this tremendous first XUM, I would like to start a
> discussion about what people would like to see in the 2.5 branch.
So if we answer positively, we'll delay the release ? I'd rather get
2.5 out, and
Peter Soetens wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 19:31, Gilles Chanteperdrix
> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> full of energy after this tremendous first XUM, I would like to start a
>> discussion about what people would like to see in the 2.5 branch.
>
> So if we answer positively, we'll delay the releas
Peter Soetens wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 19:31, Gilles Chanteperdrix
> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> full of energy after this tremendous first XUM, I would like to start a
>> discussion about what people would like to see in the 2.5 branch.
>
> So if we answer positively, we'll delay the releas
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 16:27, Gilles Chanteperdrix
wrote:
> Peter Soetens wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 19:31, Gilles Chanteperdrix
>> wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> full of energy after this tremendous first XUM, I would like to start a
>>> discussion about what people would like to see in the
Peter Soetens wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 16:27, Gilles Chanteperdrix
> wrote:
>> Peter Soetens wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 19:31, Gilles Chanteperdrix
>>> wrote:
Hi guys,
full of energy after this tremendous first XUM, I would like to start a
discussion about what
Hi,
> full of energy after this tremendous first XUM, I would like to start a
> discussion about what people would like to see in the 2.5 branch.
True, it was an great opportunity to see and talk to you guys.
Here is a first list, please feel free to criticize it:
- signals in primary domain (s
