nvoyé : lundi, 3. décembre 2007 12:56
À : xenomai-core@gna.org
Objet : Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai on Xscale (Linux 2.6.20)
I want to use Xenomai on openembedded (2.6.20 or higher) dist. for PXA270
board (compulab CM-X270). The kernel freezes during boottime after the
Xenomai nucleus etc is has starte
On Dec 3, 2007 12:56 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to use Xenomai on openembedded (2.6.20 or higher) dist. for PXA270
> board (compulab CM-X270). The kernel freezes during boottime after the
> Xenomai nucleus etc is has started, is this bug the cause of this freezing?
> Must I make th
I want to use Xenomai on openembedded (2.6.20 or higher) dist. for PXA270 board
(compulab CM-X270). The kernel freezes during boottime after the Xenomai
nucleus etc is has started, is this bug the cause of this freezing? Must I make
the modifications by hand, i can't find them in the svn!
Henk
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 10/24/07, Philippe Gerum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ROSSIER Daniel wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I've found a bug in arch/arm/xenomai/switch.S which solved the problem
>>> below. It actually comes from the iWMMXT (Intel Wireless MMX) coprocessor
>>> which is an ex
On 10/24/07, Philippe Gerum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ROSSIER Daniel wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've found a bug in arch/arm/xenomai/switch.S which solved the problem
> > below. It actually comes from the iWMMXT (Intel Wireless MMX) coprocessor
> > which is an extension of the ARM core in Xsca
On 10/24/07, ROSSIER Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've found a bug in arch/arm/xenomai/switch.S which solved the problem below.
> It actually comes from the iWMMXT (Intel Wireless MMX) coprocessor which is
> an extension of the ARM core in Xscale processor (and of course whic
ROSSIER Daniel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've found a bug in arch/arm/xenomai/switch.S which solved the problem below.
> It actually comes from the iWMMXT (Intel Wireless MMX) coprocessor which is
> an extension of the ARM core in Xscale processor (and of course which is not
> available in the AT91
Hi all,
I've found a bug in arch/arm/xenomai/switch.S which solved the problem below.
It actually comes from the iWMMXT (Intel Wireless MMX) coprocessor which is an
extension of the ARM core in Xscale processor (and of course which is not
available in the AT91 series ;-).
When a thread switch
Patrick wrote:
> Please ignore my first wrong mail ;-)
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am trying to found the bug in xenomai for PXA270 machine (xenomai 2.3.4,
> ipipe 1.7-06 and kernel 2.6.20).
>
>
>
> I have localised that the problem is coming when rt_task_create call
> __ipipe_
Patrick wrote:
> Please ignore my first wrong mail ;-)
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am trying to found the bug in xenomai for PXA270 machine (xenomai 2.3.4,
> ipipe 1.7-06 and kernel 2.6.20).
>
>
>
> I have localised that the problem is coming when rt_task_create call
> __ipipe_restore_pipelin
ROSSIER Daniel wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 15:14 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 10/12/07, Daniel Rossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > > > On 10/12/07, Daniel Rossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > > > >> ROSSIER
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 15:14 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 10/12/07, Daniel Rossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > > On 10/12/07, Daniel Rossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > > >> ROSSIER Daniel wrote:
> > > >>> Hi everyone,
> > >
On 10/12/07, Daniel Rossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > On 10/12/07, Daniel Rossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > >> ROSSIER Daniel wrote:
> > >>> Hi everyone,
> > >>>
> > >>> I'm taking over the original thread from Patrick concerning the
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 10/12/07, Daniel Rossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> ROSSIER Daniel wrote:
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>>
> >>> I'm taking over the original thread from Patrick concerning the
> >>> port of Xenomai on Xscale with Linux 2.6.20. Briefly
> >>> sum
On 10/12/07, Daniel Rossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 18:35 +0200, ROSSIER Daniel wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I'm taking over the original thread from Patrick concerning the
> > > port of Xenomai on Xscale with Linux 2.6.20. Briefly summ
On 10/12/07, Daniel Rossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > ROSSIER Daniel wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I'm taking over the original thread from Patrick concerning the
> > > port of Xenomai on Xscale with Linux 2.6.20. Briefly summarized,
> > > the boot process actually
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 18:35 +0200, ROSSIER Daniel wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'm taking over the original thread from Patrick concerning the
> > port of Xenomai on Xscale with Linux 2.6.20. Briefly summarized,
> > the boot process actually freezes after a while right a
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> ROSSIER Daniel wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'm taking over the original thread from Patrick concerning the
> > port of Xenomai on Xscale with Linux 2.6.20. Briefly summarized,
> > the boot process actually freezes after a while right after the
> > nucleus has been started.
ROSSIER Daniel wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm taking over the original thread from Patrick concerning the port of
> Xenomai on Xscale with Linux 2.6.20. Briefly summarized, the boot
> process actually freezes after a while right after the nucleus has been
> started.
>
> I've investigated the issue
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 18:35 +0200, ROSSIER Daniel wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm taking over the original thread from Patrick concerning the port of
> Xenomai on Xscale with Linux 2.6.20. Briefly summarized, the boot
> process actually freezes after a while right after the nucleus has been
> starte
20 matches
Mail list logo
