On 04/19/2012 11:02 AM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 04/19/2012 11:01 AM, Roberto Bielli wrote:
>> have you a .config for imx31 to give me so i can compare them?
>
> http://sisyphus.hd.free.fr/~gilles/config-mx31ads-2.6.33
>
> This said, looking at the code, I do not understand how it can bre
On 04/19/2012 11:01 AM, Roberto Bielli wrote:
> have you a .config for imx31 to give me so i can compare them?
http://sisyphus.hd.free.fr/~gilles/config-mx31ads-2.6.33
This said, looking at the code, I do not understand how it can break irq
delivery.
--
have you a .config for imx31 to give me so i can compare them?
Il 19/04/2012 10:54, Gilles Chanteperdrix ha scritto:
On 04/19/2012 10:52 AM, Roberto Bielli wrote:
Hi Gilles,
i found the problem that disable interrupts when execute a task.
My kernel for imx25 uses the properties CONFIG_MXC_IRQ_
On 04/19/2012 10:52 AM, Roberto Bielli wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
> i found the problem that disable interrupts when execute a task.
> My kernel for imx25 uses the properties CONFIG_MXC_IRQ_PRIOR in the .config.
> This properties enable reentrant interrupts so it uses the NIMASK(normal
> interrupt mas
Hi Gilles,
i found the problem that disable interrupts when execute a task.
My kernel for imx25 uses the properties CONFIG_MXC_IRQ_PRIOR in the .config.
This properties enable reentrant interrupts so it uses the NIMASK(normal
interrupt mask register ) register to disable interrupts with
certain
On 04/18/2012 12:28 PM, Roberto Bielli wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
> i try to give only another accurate information.
>
> i made another test:
> i write a xenomai driver for reading the timer and avic register and i
> see a strange behaviour.
> when there is the problem the interrupt is NOT masquerade
Hi Gilles,
i try to give only another accurate information.
i made another test:
i write a xenomai driver for reading the timer and avic register and i
see a strange behaviour.
when there is the problem the interrupt is NOT masqueraded in avic but
the timer has the interrupt not acked.
After
On 04/18/2012 10:44 AM, Roberto Bielli wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
> here find the answers.
> sorry for the delay.
>
> Il 13/04/2012 15:47, Gilles Chanteperdrix ha scritto:
>> On 04/13/2012 10:44 AM, Roberto Bielli wrote:
>>> Hi Gilles,
>>>
>>> you don't feel like to repeat.
>>> I'm trying all the thin
On 04/13/2012 10:44 AM, Roberto Bielli wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
> you don't feel like to repeat.
> I'm trying all the things that you told me and i will do all the missing
> test that you told me.
So, what is the result of running your test with unpatched Linux, but
with CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS enab
Hi Gilles,
you don't feel like to repeat.
I'm trying all the things that you told me and i will do all the missing
test that you told me.
And now this is the result of latency that i ran. It seems correct.
root@AXC25:/usr/xenomai/bin# ./latency
== Sampling period: 1000 us
== Test mode: periodi
On 04/12/2012 06:58 PM, Roberto Bielli wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
> you tell me that you are working on imx.
> Do you know if there is a working xenomai on imx (any kernel or imx
> version) ?
I have tested Xenomai on imx31, imx51, imx53, imx6q. It works on these
platforms. Now, what you are doing is
11 matches
Mail list logo
