On 28 November 2012 00:03, George N. White III gnw...@gmail.com wrote:
I have TL2012 from svn installed and do not have bold italics in the test
file. After you update the font caches, you can see which files are used:
$ fc-list -v Linux\ Libertine\ O | grep file
file:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:17:02PM +, Arash Zeini wrote:
On 28 November 2012 00:03, George N. White III gnw...@gmail.com wrote:
I have TL2012 from svn installed and do not have bold italics in the test
file. After you update the font caches, you can see which files are used:
$
Am 29.11.2012 um 13:17 schrieb Arash Zeini:
Am I right in the assumption that both types are installed on my
computer, but that the open type version is not being served or seen
by XeTeX?
Presumably.
To correct the issue, search for the configuration files of libfontconfig and
edit that
On 29 November 2012 15:37, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org wrote:
[...]
The Linux Libertine O fonts were changed by mistake to Linux
Libertine T (something was intended only for Type1 fonts to mitigate
the original issue but propagated to the OpenType fonts), it should be
fixed in next TeX
Thanks for all the feedback.
On 26 November 2012 23:57, Gildas Hamel gwel...@ucsc.edu wrote:
I use
\usepackage[libertine={Ligatures=TeX,
Numbers=OldStyle}]%
{libertineotf}
where I previously used Linux Libertine O.
--gildas
Gildas, do you prefer the above because you experience
On 26 November 2012 16:30, Tobias Schoel liesdieda...@googlemail.com wrote:
Tested your minimal example. Got no bold font for me.
Can you find all instances of Linux Libertine on your computer and rename
them to .backup (or whatever) except for your preferred instance of the open
type font.
I have now made sure that the map files are in correct order by using
--syncwithtrees. The map entries disabled, I also issued mktexlsr, but
this does not correct the bold italics problem.
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
Am 27.11.2012 um 11:56 schrieb Arash Zeini:
As I said the problems started with the
inclusion of the libertine- and biolinum-type1 packages.
On Linux you have the libfontconfig based font service. It uses commands like
fc-cache, fc-list, etc. It has a configuration file named fonts.conf,
On 27 November 2012 12:18, Peter Dyballa peter_dyba...@web.de wrote:
Am 27.11.2012 um 11:56 schrieb Arash Zeini:
As I said the problems started with the
inclusion of the libertine- and biolinum-type1 packages.
On Linux you have the libfontconfig based font service. It uses commands like
Am 27.11.2012 um 13:42 schrieb Arash Zeini:
I have done this, but the problem persists. Were you suggesting that
taking the above steps could possibly solve the bold italics problem?
Yes. XeTeX has problems when the same font name exists more then once.
I sort of understand this! The
2012/11/27 Peter Dyballa peter_dyba...@web.de:
Am 27.11.2012 um 13:42 schrieb Arash Zeini:
I have done this, but the problem persists. Were you suggesting that
taking the above steps could possibly solve the bold italics problem?
Yes. XeTeX has problems when the same font name exists more
Am 27.11.2012 um 16:25 schrieb Zdenek Wagner:
Not necessarily. If the fonts reside in different directory trees and
the search order is properly configured, fontconfig will find the
right one.
I'm not that sure about this… Libfontconfig lives off cache files. And this
implies on a computer:
2012/11/27 Peter Dyballa peter_dyba...@web.de:
Am 27.11.2012 um 16:25 schrieb Zdenek Wagner:
Not necessarily. If the fonts reside in different directory trees and
the search order is properly configured, fontconfig will find the
right one.
I'm not that sure about this... Libfontconfig
* Skriv a reas Arash Zeini (arash.ze...@gmail.com):
|
| On 26 November 2012 23:57, Gildas Hamel gwel...@ucsc.edu wrote:
| I use
| \usepackage[libertine={Ligatures=TeX,
| Numbers=OldStyle}]%
| {libertineotf}
| where I previously used Linux Libertine O.
|
I have TL2012 from svn installed and do not have bold italics in the test
file. After you update the font caches, you can see which files are used:
$ fc-list -v Linux\ Libertine\ O | grep file
file:
Hello,
For the past few weeks Linux Libertine O has not been working
properly with XeLaTeX (included as part of my Vanilla TeXLive 2012
installation on Debian). Some combining diacritics and few other
characters which were fine before have stopped working and show up as
empty boxes. If I invoke
Am 26.11.2012 um 12:57 schrieb Arash Zeini:
Has anyone else experienced similar problems?
Why don't you show us your test document?
--
Greetings
Pete
There are three types of people in this world: those who can count, and those
who cannot.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:57:28AM +, Arash Zeini wrote:
Hello,
For the past few weeks Linux Libertine O has not been working
properly with XeLaTeX (included as part of my Vanilla TeXLive 2012
installation on Debian). Some combining diacritics and few other
characters which were fine
On 26.11.2012 13:57, Arash Zeini wrote:
Hello,
For the past few weeks Linux Libertine O has not been working
properly with XeLaTeX (included as part of my Vanilla TeXLive 2012
installation on Debian). Some combining diacritics and few other
characters which were fine before have stopped
OK, after this afternoon's update to TexLive the combining macron's
problem is solved. But I still get bold italics, if I use \textit{}.
Minimal example:
\documentclass[a4paper,10pt]{article}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\setmainfont[Mapping=tex-text]{Linux Libertine O}
\begin{document}
A little test
Should have included a PDF for the ME, sorry!
On 26 November 2012 15:29, Arash Zeini arash.ze...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, after this afternoon's update to TexLive the combining macron's
problem is solved. But I still get bold italics, if I use \textit{}.
Minimal example:
Tested your minimal example. Got no bold font for me.
Can you find all instances of Linux Libertine on your computer and
rename them to .backup (or whatever) except for your preferred instance
of the open type font.
Then rehash your tex-distribution / font-config, (Depends on distribution)
Am 26.11.2012 um 16:29 schrieb Arash Zeini:
OK, after this afternoon's update to TexLive the combining macron's
problem is solved. But I still get bold italics, if I use \textit{}.
Your font service must be confused or in some other disorder! I used your test
file with TL 2012, 2011, and
* Skriv a reas Peter Dyballa (peter_dyba...@web.de):
|
| Am 26.11.2012 um 16:29 schrieb Arash Zeini:
|
| OK, after this afternoon's update to TexLive the combining macron's
| problem is solved. But I still get bold italics, if I use \textit{}.
|
| Your font service must
Am 27.11.2012 um 00:57 schrieb Gildas Hamel:
I use
\usepackage[libertine={Ligatures=TeX,
Numbers=OldStyle}]%
{libertineotf}
where I previously used Linux Libertine O.
You're using a package (that its author has given up AFAIR) which has to load
the Libertine OTF font files from
I solved this problem removing the fonts I download from sourceforge.net and
installing the font available in ctan.
On Jun 16, 2011, at 11:28 AM, Rik wrote:
On 2011-06-13 16:38, Sebastian Gerecke wrote:
Hi,
I tried the new version 5 of the Linux Libertine font. I'm getting a way to
heavy
On 2011-06-13 16:38, Sebastian Gerecke wrote:
Hi,
I tried the new version 5 of the Linux Libertine font. I'm getting a way to
heavy serif font. Could someone please check if this a problem with my setup
or a real problem?
Thanks,
Sebastian
\documentclass[fontsize=12pt]{scrartcl}
Hi,
It seems like there have been problems with downloading
the archive from SourceForge.
Last time I tried the archive was broken:
viz.
[GlenMorangie:~/Downloads] rossmoor% tar tf LinLibertineFont-4.4.1.tar
use the latex version on ctan
ftp://dante.ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/libertine/
Am Dienstag 14 Juni 2011, 07:44:49 schrieb M. Niedermair:
Hi,
I tried the new version 5 of the Linux Libertine font. I'm getting a way
to heavy serif font. Could someone please check if this a problem with
my setup or a real problem?
Thanks,
Sebastian
platforms xetex@tug.org
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: [XeTeX] Linux Libertine 5 serif too heavy
Hello Sebastien,
On 14/06/2011, at 6:38 AM, Sebastian Gerecke wrote:
Hi,
I tried the new version 5 of the Linux Libertine font. I'm getting a way
to
heavy serif font. Could someone
Hi David,
On 14/06/2011, at 11:15 AM, David J. Perry wrote:
Ross,
It looks like you may have multiple versions of Libertine. The list of fonts
at the left of your screen shot shows Linux Libertine O, which is the
opentype version (fonts endings in .otf), while the main portion shows
Hi,
I tried the new version 5 of the Linux Libertine font. I'm getting a way to
heavy serif font. Could someone please check if this a problem with my setup
or a real problem?
Thanks,
Sebastian
\documentclass[fontsize=12pt]{scrartcl}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\setmainfont{Linux Libertine O}
Hi,
thans for your reply. Actually, with version LinLibertine_Re-4.7.5.otf I do
get the desired output. That's why I'm so confused.
use the actual version!
ftp://dante.ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/libertine/
By
Michael
--
Subscriptions,
Kārlis Repsons wrote:
I set that up and except for one strange problem, which I resolved,
worked seemingly all fine. The strange problem was this: with the old
version of Linux Libertine (4.4.1) word Pērse was output well, but
with the new 4.7.5 one it was output so that 'ē' gets printed right
Am Thu, 30 Dec 2010 18:51:22 + schrieb Philip Taylor (Webmaster,
Ret'd):
It is a very bad idea to make numbers active and to define them in
this way.
By way of demonstration that one can make digits active yet
still have access to the functionality that François needs,
I append the
Ulrike Fischer wrote:
Well Francois wanted to avoid to have to write $7$ or \text{7)
instead of simply 7 in all sort of places. So I don't think a
solution which forces him to write \seven in all sort of places
offers him the functionality he needs.
But it doesn't; it requires him to write
Afterthought : surely the real point is to give François
a choice -- now at least he is aware that there is a simple
TeX solution to his problem, and that he does not need
to learn all the intricacies of fontspec in order to
solve a trivial problem.
** Phil.
Am Fri, 31 Dec 2010 12:04:22 + schrieb Philip Taylor (Webmaster,
Ret'd):
Afterthought : surely the real point is to give François
a choice -- now at least he is aware that there is a simple
TeX solution to his problem, and that he does not need
to learn all the intricacies of fontspec in
Ulrike Fischer wrote:
And please don't repeat that you was not in any
way trying to suggest that this is a general or universal
solution.. You _did_ sent the first example without any code which
restricted the effect of the catcodes changes and without any
warnings about side-effects. This
Could you please calm down. Nobody was hurt, just a little misunderstanding.
Am 31.12.2010 15:35, schrieb Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd):
Ulrike Fischer wrote:
And please don't repeat that you was not in any
way trying to suggest that this is a general or universal
solution.. You _did_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 31/12/2010 15:35, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) a écrit :
Ulrike Fischer wrote:
And please don't repeat that you was not in any
way trying to suggest that this is a general or universal
solution.. You _did_ sent the first example
François Patte wrote:
I think that many people are like me: using latex and finding some
solutions to their problems but without going deeply into the technical
part of it. Mastering the side effects of a solution like yours is not
obvious and you should have given some information about the
Ulrike Fischer wrote:
It is a very bad idea to make numbers active and to define them in
this way.
By way of demonstration that one can make digits active yet
still have access to the functionality that François needs,
I append the following :
** Phil.
\documentclass {minimal}
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 28/12/2010 21:03, Peter Dyballa a écrit :
Am 28.12.2010 um 19:44 schrieb François Patte:
Multiply 5 by 7: $7\times 5 = 35$
With XeTeX and fontspec loaded you also load xunicode. So you can write
as well:
Multiply 5 by 7: 7
Am Tue, 28 Dec 2010 19:08:57 + schrieb Philip Taylor (Webmaster,
Ret'd):
Bonjour, François : is this perhaps the sort of
thing you had in mind ?
\documentclass {minimal}
\usepackage {fontspec}
\setmainfont {Linux Libertine O}
\begin {document}
Multiply 5 by 7: $7\times 5 = 35$
I read somewhere that Linux Libertine developers are working on an
OpenType math font, may be there is a beta release somewhere.
Not yet!
Maybe in some weeks a alpha version.
By
Michael
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
Am 29.12.2010 um 10:14 schrieb François Patte:
I was wondering if there would be some fonts feature like:
[Numbers=OldStyle], one could imagine: [Numbers=MathNumbers]
MathNumbers can be found in the Supplementary Multilingual Plane
(SMP) at U+1D400...1D7FF.
--
Greetings
Pete
Hi,
I could have used array instead of longtable but, it is not handy to
write normal text within the mathematical mode and I need to mix both...
the package array helps. it defines the {} and {} column modifiers
for tabular environments:
\documentclass{minimal}
\usepackage{fontspec}
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
I would like to know why the numbers are different if typed with or
without the $ sign:
Using \setmainfont{Linux Libertine O} 7 is smaller than $7$
Is it possible to correct this? I want the same size (ie. $7$)
Of course I can always
Am 28.12.2010 um 11:06 schrieb François Patte:
Is it possible to correct this?
Yes: set up the maths font used for $7$ accordingly. (In TeX text and
maths fonts are different.)
Some like the difference of shape between a text 7 and and a maths 7.
If you are not among them, then simply
François Patte wrote:
Thanks for this answer. It is not too nice if you have to write:
Multiply 5 by 7: $7\times 5 = 35$
Bonjour, François : is this perhaps the sort of
thing you had in mind ?
\documentclass {minimal}
\usepackage {fontspec}
\setmainfont {Linux Libertine O}
\begin
Am 28.12.2010 um 19:44 schrieb François Patte:
Multiply 5 by 7: $7\times 5 = 35$
With XeTeX and fontspec loaded you also load xunicode. So you can
write as well:
Multiply 5 by 7: 7 \texttimes{} 5 = 35
Multiply 5 by 7: 7 × 5 = 35
I see another problem here: Is 5
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 07:44:42PM +0100, François Patte wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 28/12/2010 12:14, Peter Dyballa a écrit :
Am 28.12.2010 um 11:06 schrieb François Patte:
Is it possible to correct this?
Yes: set up the maths font used for $7$
And we can dub this, um, let me see, ... ActiveteX. :-)
2010/12/28 Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk
François Patte wrote:
Thanks for this answer. It is not too nice if you have to write:
Multiply 5 by 7: $7\times 5 = 35$
Bonjour, François : is this perhaps the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 13/03/2010 21:37, Joshua and Amy a écrit :
The developer of the Linux Libertine font package is probably going to
add diacritic-stacking to the font's capabilities (mark-to-mark
positioning?).
I've asked for circumflex + breve. Are there
This is excellent news. I would like to see macron with acute on top of
it and breve with acute on top.
David
Joshua and Amy wrote:
The developer of the Linux Libertine font package is probably going to
add diacritic-stacking to the font's capabilities (mark-to-mark
positioning?).
I've
56 matches
Mail list logo
